Remove the "ShieldType" concept (#430)

# What does this PR do?

This PR kills the notion of "ShieldType". The impetus for this is the
realization:

> Why is keyword llama-guard appearing so many times everywhere,
sometimes with hyphens, sometimes with underscores?

Now that we have a notion of "provider specific resource identifiers"
and "user specific aliases" for those and the fact that this works with
models ("Llama3.1-8B-Instruct" <> "fireworks/llama-3pv1-..."), we can
follow the same rules for Shields.

So each Safety provider can make up a notion of identifiers it has
registered. This already happens with Bedrock correctly. We just
generalize it for Llama Guard, Prompt Guard, etc.

For Llama Guard, we further simplify by just adopting the underlying
model name itself as the identifier! No confusion necessary.

While doing this, I noticed a bug in our DistributionRegistry where we
weren't scoping identifiers by type. Fixed.

## Feature/Issue validation/testing/test plan

Ran (inference, safety, memory, agents) tests with ollama and fireworks
providers.
This commit is contained in:
Ashwin Bharambe 2024-11-12 12:37:24 -08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 09269e2a44
commit 983d6ce2df
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
26 changed files with 150 additions and 209 deletions

View file

@ -136,17 +136,18 @@ class CommonRoutingTableImpl(RoutingTable):
else:
raise ValueError("Unknown routing table type")
apiname, objtype = apiname_object()
# Get objects from disk registry
objects = self.dist_registry.get_cached(routing_key)
objects = self.dist_registry.get_cached(objtype, routing_key)
if not objects:
apiname, objname = apiname_object()
provider_ids = list(self.impls_by_provider_id.keys())
if len(provider_ids) > 1:
provider_ids_str = f"any of the providers: {', '.join(provider_ids)}"
else:
provider_ids_str = f"provider: `{provider_ids[0]}`"
raise ValueError(
f"{objname.capitalize()} `{routing_key}` not served by {provider_ids_str}. Make sure there is an {apiname} provider serving this {objname}."
f"{objtype.capitalize()} `{routing_key}` not served by {provider_ids_str}. Make sure there is an {apiname} provider serving this {objtype}."
)
for obj in objects:
@ -156,19 +157,19 @@ class CommonRoutingTableImpl(RoutingTable):
raise ValueError(f"Provider not found for `{routing_key}`")
async def get_object_by_identifier(
self, identifier: str
self, type: str, identifier: str
) -> Optional[RoutableObjectWithProvider]:
# Get from disk registry
objects = await self.dist_registry.get(identifier)
objects = await self.dist_registry.get(type, identifier)
if not objects:
return None
# kind of ill-defined behavior here, but we'll just return the first one
assert len(objects) == 1
return objects[0]
async def register_object(self, obj: RoutableObjectWithProvider):
# Get existing objects from registry
existing_objects = await self.dist_registry.get(obj.identifier)
existing_objects = await self.dist_registry.get(obj.type, obj.identifier)
# Check for existing registration
for existing_obj in existing_objects:
@ -200,7 +201,7 @@ class ModelsRoutingTable(CommonRoutingTableImpl, Models):
return await self.get_all_with_type("model")
async def get_model(self, identifier: str) -> Optional[Model]:
return await self.get_object_by_identifier(identifier)
return await self.get_object_by_identifier("model", identifier)
async def register_model(
self,
@ -236,12 +237,11 @@ class ShieldsRoutingTable(CommonRoutingTableImpl, Shields):
return await self.get_all_with_type(ResourceType.shield.value)
async def get_shield(self, identifier: str) -> Optional[Shield]:
return await self.get_object_by_identifier(identifier)
return await self.get_object_by_identifier("shield", identifier)
async def register_shield(
self,
shield_id: str,
shield_type: ShieldType,
provider_shield_id: Optional[str] = None,
provider_id: Optional[str] = None,
params: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
@ -260,7 +260,6 @@ class ShieldsRoutingTable(CommonRoutingTableImpl, Shields):
params = {}
shield = Shield(
identifier=shield_id,
shield_type=shield_type,
provider_resource_id=provider_shield_id,
provider_id=provider_id,
params=params,
@ -274,7 +273,7 @@ class MemoryBanksRoutingTable(CommonRoutingTableImpl, MemoryBanks):
return await self.get_all_with_type(ResourceType.memory_bank.value)
async def get_memory_bank(self, memory_bank_id: str) -> Optional[MemoryBank]:
return await self.get_object_by_identifier(memory_bank_id)
return await self.get_object_by_identifier("memory_bank", memory_bank_id)
async def register_memory_bank(
self,
@ -312,7 +311,7 @@ class DatasetsRoutingTable(CommonRoutingTableImpl, Datasets):
return await self.get_all_with_type("dataset")
async def get_dataset(self, dataset_id: str) -> Optional[Dataset]:
return await self.get_object_by_identifier(dataset_id)
return await self.get_object_by_identifier("dataset", dataset_id)
async def register_dataset(
self,
@ -348,10 +347,10 @@ class DatasetsRoutingTable(CommonRoutingTableImpl, Datasets):
class ScoringFunctionsRoutingTable(CommonRoutingTableImpl, ScoringFunctions):
async def list_scoring_functions(self) -> List[ScoringFn]:
return await self.get_all_with_type(ResourceType.scoring_function.value)
return await self.get_all_with_type("scoring_function")
async def get_scoring_function(self, scoring_fn_id: str) -> Optional[ScoringFn]:
return await self.get_object_by_identifier(scoring_fn_id)
return await self.get_object_by_identifier("scoring_function", scoring_fn_id)
async def register_scoring_function(
self,
@ -389,7 +388,7 @@ class EvalTasksRoutingTable(CommonRoutingTableImpl, EvalTasks):
return await self.get_all_with_type("eval_task")
async def get_eval_task(self, name: str) -> Optional[EvalTask]:
return await self.get_object_by_identifier(name)
return await self.get_object_by_identifier("eval_task", name)
async def register_eval_task(
self,