mirror of
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack.git
synced 2025-12-11 19:56:03 +00:00
fix: validate provider_data silently to avoid error log noise
Speculatively checking all providers means validation failures are expected when users don't provide keys for a provider. Validate directly instead of using get_request_provider_data() which logs errors.
This commit is contained in:
parent
60086df3b5
commit
c0d51c89e6
1 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions
|
|
@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ from llama_stack.core.datatypes import (
|
|||
RegistryEntrySource,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from llama_stack.core.request_headers import PROVIDER_DATA_VAR, NeedsRequestProviderData
|
||||
from llama_stack.core.utils.dynamic import instantiate_class_type
|
||||
from llama_stack.log import get_logger
|
||||
|
||||
from .common import CommonRoutingTableImpl, lookup_model
|
||||
|
|
@ -69,10 +70,13 @@ class ModelsRoutingTable(CommonRoutingTableImpl, Models):
|
|||
if not spec or not getattr(spec, "provider_data_validator", None):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
# Try to get validated provider_data for this provider
|
||||
# Returns None if validation fails (missing keys) or if no provider_data exists
|
||||
validated_data = provider.get_request_provider_data()
|
||||
if validated_data is None:
|
||||
# Validate provider_data silently - we're speculatively checking all providers
|
||||
# so validation failures are expected when user didn't provide keys for this provider
|
||||
try:
|
||||
validator = instantiate_class_type(spec.provider_data_validator)
|
||||
validator(**provider_data)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
# User didn't provide credentials for this provider - skip silently
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
# Validation succeeded! User has credentials for this provider
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue