docs: Clarify kfp provider is both local and remote

The provider selling point *is* using the same provider for both.

Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ihar Hrachyshka 2025-05-12 13:13:33 -04:00
parent 473a07f624
commit c17bccf730

View file

@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Here's a list of known external providers that you can use with Llama Stack:
| Name | Description | API | Type | Repository |
|------|-------------|-----|------|------------|
| KubeFlow Training | Train models with KubeFlow | Post Training | Remote | [llama-stack-provider-kft](https://github.com/opendatahub-io/llama-stack-provider-kft) |
| KubeFlow Pipelines | Train models with KubeFlow Pipelines | Post Training | Remote | [llama-stack-provider-kfp-trainer](https://github.com/opendatahub-io/llama-stack-provider-kfp-trainer) |
| KubeFlow Pipelines | Train models with KubeFlow Pipelines | Post Training | Inline **and** Remote | [llama-stack-provider-kfp-trainer](https://github.com/opendatahub-io/llama-stack-provider-kfp-trainer) |
| RamaLama | Inference models with RamaLama | Inference | Remote | [ramalama-stack](https://github.com/containers/ramalama-stack) |
| TrustyAI LM-Eval | Evaluate models with TrustyAI LM-Eval | Eval | Remote | [llama-stack-provider-lmeval](https://github.com/trustyai-explainability/llama-stack-provider-lmeval) |