# What does this PR do?
This PR contains two sets of notebooks that serve as reference material
for developers getting started with Llama Stack using the NVIDIA
Provider. Developers should be able to execute these notebooks
end-to-end, pointing to their NeMo Microservices deployment.
1. `beginner_e2e/`: Notebook that walks through a beginner end-to-end
workflow that covers creating datasets, running inference, customizing
and evaluating models, and running safety checks.
2. `tool_calling/`: Notebook that is ported over from the [Data Flywheel
& Tool Calling
notebook](https://github.com/NVIDIA/GenerativeAIExamples/tree/main/nemo/data-flywheel)
that is referenced in the NeMo Microservices docs. I updated the
notebook to use the Llama Stack client wherever possible, and added
relevant instructions.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
- Both notebook folders contain READMEs with pre-requisites. To manually
test these notebooks, you'll need to have a deployment of the NeMo
Microservices Platform and update the `config.py` file with your
deployment's information.
- I've run through these notebooks manually end-to-end to verify each
step works.
[//]: # (## Documentation)
---------
Co-authored-by: Jash Gulabrai <jgulabrai@nvidia.com>
# Issue
Closes#2073
# What does this PR do?
- Removes the `datasets.rst` from the list of document urls as it no
longer exists in torchtune. Referenced PR:
https://github.com/pytorch/torchtune/pull/1781
- Added a step to run `uv sync`. Previously, I would get the following
error:
```
➜ llama-stack git:(remove-deprecated-rst) uv venv --python 3.10
source .venv/bin/activate
Using CPython 3.10.13 interpreter at: /usr/bin/python3.10
Creating virtual environment at: .venv
Activate with: source .venv/bin/activate
(llama-stack) ➜ llama-stack git:(remove-deprecated-rst) INFERENCE_MODEL=llama3.2:3b llama stack build --template ollama --image-type venv --run
zsh: llama: command not found...
```
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
To test: Run through `rag_agent` example in the `detailed_tutorial.md`
file.
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
**What**
Instead of adhoc creating a vectordb and chunking when documents ae sent
as an attachment to agent turn, we directly pass raw text from document
into messages to model for user context, and let model perform
summarization directly.
This removes the magic behaviour, and yields better performance than
existing approach.
**Improved Performance**
- RAG lifecycle notebook
- Model: 0.3 factuality score
- (+ websearch) Agent: 0.44 factuality score
- (+ vector db) Agent: 0.3 factuality score
- (+ raw context) Agent: 0.6 factuality score
Closes https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/1478
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
- [NEW] added section in RAG lifecycle notebook shows better performance
<img width="840" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a0c4e816-809a-41c0-9124-89825983e3f5"
/>
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
- update llamastack/evals to llamastack/simpleqa
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
```
pytest -v -s --nbval-lax ./docs/notebooks/Llama_Stack_Benchmark_Evals.ipynb
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
- This was missed from previous deprecation:
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1186
- Part of https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/1396
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
```
pytest -v -s --nbval-lax ./llama-stack/docs/notebooks/Llama_Stack_Benchmark_Evals.ipynb
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
The `--image-name __system__` thing was a hack and a bad one at that.
The actual intent was to somehow automatically detect the notebook
environment so we could avoid unnecessarily confusing things in the
llama stack build cmd-line. But I failed which led us to use the backup
`__system__` thing.
Let's just do the simple thing.
Note that `build_venv.sh` I haven't changed for now (so it still honors
the __system__ special name just that no new user should use it.)
## Test Plan
Open the notebooks from this branch in Colab (see example url below) and
ensure the builds work.
https://colab.research.google.com/github/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/foo/docs/getting_started.ipynb
In the notebook, install llama-stack from this branch directly using:
```
!pip install -U https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/archive/refs/heads/foo.zip
```
Verify that `!UV_SYSTEM_PYTHON=1 llama stack build --template together
--image-type venv` afterwards succeeds and the library client
initialization also works.
# What does this PR do?
[Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to relevant
issues if applicable.]
3783861877
```
diff --git a/docs/notebooks/Alpha_Llama_Stack_Post_Training.ipynb b/docs/notebooks/Alpha_Llama_Stack_Post_Training.ipynb
index c55c8da..3979088 100644
--- a/docs/notebooks/Alpha_Llama_Stack_Post_Training.ipynb
+++ b/docs/notebooks/Alpha_Llama_Stack_Post_Training.ipynb
@@ -6431,4 +6431,4 @@
},
"nbformat": 4,
"nbformat_minor": 0
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
```
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
[//]: # (## Documentation)
---------
Signed-off-by: reidliu <reid201711@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: reidliu <reid201711@gmail.com>
## context
Now, in llama stack, we only support inference / eval a finetuned
checkpoint with meta-reference as inference provider. This is
sub-optimal since meta-reference is pretty slow.
Our vision is that developer can inference / eval a finetuned checkpoint
produced by post training apis with all the inference providers on the
stack. To achieve this, we'd like to define an unified output checkpoint
format for post training providers. So that, all the inference provider
can respect that format for customized model inference.
By spotting check how
[ollama](https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/main/docs/import.md) and
[fireworks](https://docs.fireworks.ai/models/uploading-custom-models) do
inference on a customized model, we defined the output checkpoint format
as /adapter/adapter_config.json and /adapter/adapter_model.safetensors
(as we only support LoRA post training now, we begin from adapter only
checkpoint)
## test
we kick off a post training job and configured checkpoint format as
'huggingface'. Output files
we did a proof of concept with ollama to see if ollama can inference our
finetuned checkpoint
1. create Modelfile like
<img width="799" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-22 at 5 04 18 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7fca9ac3-a294-44f8-aab1-83852c600609"
/>
2. create a customized model with `ollama create llama_3_2_finetuned`
and run inference successfully
This is just a proof of concept with ollama cmd line. As next step, we'd
like to wrap loading / inference customized model logic in the inference
provider implementation.
# What does this PR do?
- Fully deprecate eval/tasks
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
Closes#1088
NOTE: this will be a breaking change. We have introduced the new API in
0.1.3 .
Notebook has been updated to use the new endpoints.
## Test Plan
```
pytest -v -s --nbval-lax ./docs/notebooks/Llama_Stack_Benchmark_Evals.ipynb
```
<img width="611" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/79f6efe1-81ba-494e-bf36-1fc0c2b9bc6f"
/>
cc @SLR722 for awareness
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
- Update `/eval-tasks` to `/benchmarks`
- ⚠️ Remove differentiation between `app` v.s. `benchmark` eval task
config. Now we only have `BenchmarkConfig`. The overloaded `benchmark`
is confusing and do not add any value. Backward compatibility is being
kept as the "type" is not being used anywhere.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
- This change is backward compatible
- Run notebook test with
```
pytest -v -s --nbval-lax ./docs/getting_started.ipynb
pytest -v -s --nbval-lax ./docs/notebooks/Llama_Stack_Benchmark_Evals.ipynb
```
<img width="846" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d2fc06a7-593a-444f-bc1f-10ab9b0c843d"
/>
[//]: # (## Documentation)
[//]: # (- [ ] Added a Changelog entry if the change is significant)
---------
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: reidliu <reid201711@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Browning <ben324@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Reid <61492567+reidliu41@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: reidliu <reid201711@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
It's a more generic term and applicable to alternatives of Docker, such
as Podman or other OCI-compliant technologies.
---------
Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
Cleans up how we provide sampling params. Earlier, strategy was an enum
and all params (top_p, temperature, top_k) across all strategies were
grouped. We now have a strategy union object with each strategy (greedy,
top_p, top_k) having its corresponding params.
Earlier,
```
class SamplingParams:
strategy: enum ()
top_p, temperature, top_k and other params
```
However, the `strategy` field was not being used in any providers making
it confusing to know the exact sampling behavior purely based on the
params since you could pass temperature, top_p, top_k and how the
provider would interpret those would not be clear.
Hence we introduced -- a union where the strategy and relevant params
are all clubbed together to avoid this confusion.
Have updated all providers, tests, notebooks, readme and otehr places
where sampling params was being used to use the new format.
## Test Plan
`pytest llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/groq/test_groq_utils.py`
// inference on ollama, fireworks and together
`with-proxy pytest -v -s -k "ollama"
--inference-model="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct"
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py `
// agents on fireworks
`pytest -v -s -k 'fireworks and create_agent'
--inference-model="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct"
llama_stack/providers/tests/agents/test_agents.py
--safety-shield="meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B"`
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [X] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [X] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [X] Updated relevant documentation.
- [X] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hardik Shah <hjshah@fb.com>
# What does this PR do?
PR #639 introduced the notion of Tools API and ability to invoke tools
through API just as any resource. This PR changes the Agents to start
using the Tools API to invoke tools. Major changes include:
1) Ability to specify tool groups with AgentConfig
2) Agent gets the corresponding tool definitions for the specified tools
and pass along to the model
3) Attachements are now named as Documents and their behavior is mostly
unchanged from user perspective
4) You can specify args that can be injected to a tool call through
Agent config. This is especially useful in case of memory tool, where
you want the tool to operate on a specific memory bank.
5) You can also register tool groups with args, which lets the agent
inject these as well into the tool call.
6) All tests have been migrated to use new tools API and fixtures
including client SDK tests
7) Telemetry just works with tools API because of our trace protocol
decorator
## Test Plan
```
pytest -s -v -k fireworks llama_stack/providers/tests/agents/test_agents.py \
--safety-shield=meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B \
--inference-model=meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
pytest -s -v -k together llama_stack/providers/tests/tools/test_tools.py \
--safety-shield=meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B \
--inference-model=meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG="/Users/dineshyv/.llama/distributions/llamastack-together/together-run.yaml" pytest -v tests/client-sdk/agents/test_agents.py
```
run.yaml:
https://gist.github.com/dineshyv/0365845ad325e1c2cab755788ccc5994
Notebook:
https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1ck7hXQxRl6UvT-ijNRZ-gMZxH1G3cN2d?usp=sharing
