# Summary:
removes the use of pickle
# Test Plan:
Run the following with `--record-responses` first, then another time
without.
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v
tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield
meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B --text-model
meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
You now run the integration tests with these options:
```bash
Custom options:
--stack-config=STACK_CONFIG
a 'pointer' to the stack. this can be either be:
(a) a template name like `fireworks`, or
(b) a path to a run.yaml file, or
(c) an adhoc config spec, e.g.
`inference=fireworks,safety=llama-guard,agents=meta-
reference`
--env=ENV Set environment variables, e.g. --env KEY=value
--text-model=TEXT_MODEL
comma-separated list of text models. Fixture name:
text_model_id
--vision-model=VISION_MODEL
comma-separated list of vision models. Fixture name:
vision_model_id
--embedding-model=EMBEDDING_MODEL
comma-separated list of embedding models. Fixture name:
embedding_model_id
--safety-shield=SAFETY_SHIELD
comma-separated list of safety shields. Fixture name:
shield_id
--judge-model=JUDGE_MODEL
comma-separated list of judge models. Fixture name:
judge_model_id
--embedding-dimension=EMBEDDING_DIMENSION
Output dimensionality of the embedding model to use for
testing. Default: 384
--record-responses Record new API responses instead of using cached ones.
--report=REPORT Path where the test report should be written, e.g.
--report=/path/to/report.md
```
Importantly, if you don't specify any of the models (text-model,
vision-model, etc.) the relevant tests will get **skipped!**
This will make running tests somewhat more annoying since all options
will need to be specified. We will make this easier by adding some easy
wrapper yaml configs.
## Test Plan
Example:
```bash
ashwin@ashwin-mbp ~/local/llama-stack/tests/integration (unify_tests) $
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v inference/test_text_inference.py \
--text-model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct
```
# Summary:
Client side change in
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-client-python/pull/180
Changes the resume_turn API to accept `ToolResponse` instead of
`ToolResponseMessage`:
1. `ToolResponse` contains `metadata`
2. `ToolResponseMessage` is a concept for model inputs. Here we are just
submitting the outputs of tool execution.
# Test Plan:
Ran integration tests with newly added test using client tool with
metadata
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v
tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield
meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B --record-responses
# What does this PR do?
When running `tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py` on
smaller models, such as Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct, I sometimes get test
flakes where the model passes "San Francisco" as an argument to my tool
call instead of "San Francisco, CA" which is what we expect.
So, this expands upon that tool calling parameter's description to
explicitly state that both city and state are required. With this
change, the tool calling tests that are checking for this "San
Francisco, CA" value are always passing for me instead of sometimes
failing.
## Test Plan
I test this locally via vLLM like:
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" \
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=remote-vllm \
python -m pytest -v \
tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--inference-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
--vision-inference-model ""
```
I don't expect this would negatively impact the parameter generated for
this tool call by other models, as we're providing additional guidance
but not removing any of the existing guidance. However, I cannot easily
confirm that myself.
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This gracefully handles the case where the vLLM server responded to a
completion request with no choices, which can happen in certain vLLM
error situations. Previously, we'd error out with a stack trace about a
list index out of range. Now, we just log a warning to the user and move
past any chunks with an empty choices list.
A specific example of the type of stack trace this fixes:
```
File "/app/llama-stack-source/llama_stack/providers/remote/inference/vllm/vllm.py", line 170, in _process_vllm_chat_completion_stream_response
choice = chunk.choices[0]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^
IndexError: list index out of range
```
Now, instead of erroring out with that stack trace, we log a warning
that vLLM failed to generate any completions and alert the user to check
the vLLM server logs for details.
This is related to #1277 and addresses the stack trace shown in that
issue, although does not in and of itself change the functional behavior
of vLLM tool calling.
## Test Plan
As part of this fix, I added new unit tests to trigger this same error
and verify it no longer happens. That is
`test_process_vllm_chat_completion_stream_response_no_choices` in the
new `tests/unit/providers/inference/test_remote_vllm.py`. I also added a
couple of more tests to trigger and verify the last couple of remote
vllm provider bug fixes - specifically a test for #1236 (builtin tool
calling) and #1325 (vLLM <= v0.6.3).
This required fixing the signature of
`_process_vllm_chat_completion_stream_response` to accept the actual
type of chunks it was getting passed - specifically changing from our
openai_compat `OpenAICompatCompletionResponse` to
`openai.types.chat.chat_completion_chunk.ChatCompletionChunk`. It was
not actually getting passed `OpenAICompatCompletionResponse` objects
before, and was using attributes that didn't exist on those objects. So,
the signature now matches the type of object it's actually passed.
Run these new unit tests like this:
```
pytest tests/unit/providers/inference/test_remote_vllm.py
```
Additionally, I ensured the existing `test_text_inference.py` tests
passed via:
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" \
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=remote-vllm \
python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--inference-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
--vision-inference-model ""
```
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
All of the tests from `llama_stack/providers/tests/` are now moved to
`tests/integration`.
I converted the `tools`, `scoring` and `datasetio` tests to use API.
However, `eval` and `post_training` proved to be a bit challenging to
leaving those. I think `post_training` should be relatively
straightforward also.
As part of this, I noticed that `wolfram_alpha` tool wasn't added to
some of our commonly used distros so I added it. I am going to remove a
lot of code duplication from distros next so while this looks like a
one-off right now, it will go away and be there uniformly for all
distros.
Summary:
Test Plan:
added new test
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v
tests/api/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield
meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B
# What does this PR do?
- Deprecate allow_turn_resume flag as this is used for staying backward
compat.
- Closes https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/1363
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -v tests/api/agents/test_agents.py --inference-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct" --record-responses
```
<img width="1054" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d31de2d4-0953-41e1-a71a-7e1579fa351a"
/>
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Continues the refactor of tests.
Tests from `providers/tests` should be considered deprecated. For this
PR, I deleted most of the tests in
- inference
- safety
- agents
since much more comprehensive tests exist in
`tests/integration/{inference,safety,agents}` already.
I moved `test_persistence.py` from agents, but disabled all the tests
since that test needs to be properly migrated.
## Test Plan
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v agents --vision-inference-model=''
/Users/ashwin/homebrew/Caskroom/miniconda/base/envs/toolchain/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pytest_asyncio/plugin.py:208: PytestDeprecationWarning: The configuration option "asyncio_default_fixture_loop_scope" is unset.
The event loop scope for asynchronous fixtures will default to the fixture caching scope. Future versions of pytest-asyncio will default the loop scope for asynchronous fixtures to function scope. Set the default fixture loop scope explicitly in order to avoid unexpected behavior in the future. Valid fixture loop scopes are: "function", "class", "module", "package", "session"
warnings.warn(PytestDeprecationWarning(_DEFAULT_FIXTURE_LOOP_SCOPE_UNSET))
======================================================================================================= test session starts ========================================================================================================
platform darwin -- Python 3.10.16, pytest-8.3.3, pluggy-1.5.0 -- /Users/ashwin/homebrew/Caskroom/miniconda/base/envs/toolchain/bin/python
cachedir: .pytest_cache
metadata: {'Python': '3.10.16', 'Platform': 'macOS-15.3.1-arm64-arm-64bit', 'Packages': {'pytest': '8.3.3', 'pluggy': '1.5.0'}, 'Plugins': {'asyncio': '0.24.0', 'html': '4.1.1', 'metadata': '3.1.1', 'anyio': '4.8.0', 'nbval': '0.11.0'}}
rootdir: /Users/ashwin/local/llama-stack
configfile: pyproject.toml
plugins: asyncio-0.24.0, html-4.1.1, metadata-3.1.1, anyio-4.8.0, nbval-0.11.0
asyncio: mode=strict, default_loop_scope=None
collected 15 items
agents/test_agents.py::test_agent_simple[txt=8B] PASSED
agents/test_agents.py::test_tool_config[txt=8B] PASSED
agents/test_agents.py::test_builtin_tool_web_search[txt=8B] PASSED
agents/test_agents.py::test_builtin_tool_code_execution[txt=8B] PASSED
agents/test_agents.py::test_code_interpreter_for_attachments[txt=8B] PASSED
agents/test_agents.py::test_custom_tool[txt=8B] PASSED
agents/test_agents.py::test_custom_tool_infinite_loop[txt=8B] PASSED
agents/test_agents.py::test_tool_choice[txt=8B] PASSED
agents/test_agents.py::test_rag_agent[txt=8B-builtin::rag/knowledge_search] PASSED
agents/test_agents.py::test_rag_agent[txt=8B-builtin::rag] PASSED
agents/test_agents.py::test_rag_agent_with_attachments[txt=8B] PASSED
agents/test_agents.py::test_rag_and_code_agent[txt=8B] PASSED
agents/test_agents.py::test_create_turn_response[txt=8B] PASSED
agents/test_persistence.py::test_delete_agents_and_sessions SKIPPED (This test needs to be migrated to api / client-sdk world)
agents/test_persistence.py::test_get_agent_turns_and_steps SKIPPED (This test needs to be migrated to api / client-sdk world)
```
# What does this PR do?
Fix end of files hook for pre-commit.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
Run pre-commit without any errors:
```
uv run pre-commit run --all-files
```
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Summary:
1. The `tools` parameter we construct to pass the inference API is
non-deterministic. As a result, our recordable mocks is flaky as the
ordering change sometimes. This PR makes it so that `tools` ordering is
deterministic and aligned with the order user specified.
2. In recordable mock key generation, client tool's parameter type was
'str' and now is 'string' for some reason. I didn't dig into exactly
why, but just regenerated the fixtures.
Test Plan:
Regenerate mocks:
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B --record-responses
```
Rerun tests without --record-responses:
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B
```
Move unittests to tests/unittests. Gradually nuking tests from
providers/tests/ and unifying them into tests/api (which are e2e tests
using SDK types)
## Test Plan
`pytest -s -v tests/unittests/`
Summary:
Agent tests shouldn't need to run inference and tools calls repeatedly.
This PR introduces a way to record inference/tool calls and reuse them
in subsequent test runs, which makes the tests more reliable and saves
costs.
Test Plan:
Run when there's no recorded calls created (fails):
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B
```
Run when `--record-responses` to record calls:
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B --record-responses
```
Run without `--record-responses` again (succeeds):
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B
```
# What does this PR do?
We currently use `max_infer_iters` in 2 different ways
1/ Server: track number of times
2/ Client side: track number of times we send `resume_turn` request
This PR gets rid of the need of (2) and makes server track total number
of times we perform inference within a Turn
**NOTE**
The PR will assume StopReason is set to
- end_of_message: turn is not finished, we could be waiting for client
tool call responses
- end_of_turn: if the entire turn is finished and there's no more things
to be done.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
```
LLAMA_STACK_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8321 pytest -v tests/client-sdk/agents/test_agents.py::test_custom_tool_infinite_loop --inference-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct"
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
A self-respecting server needs good observability which starts with
configurable logging. Llama Stack had little until now. This PR adds a
`logcat` facility towards that. Callsites look like:
```python
logcat.debug("inference", f"params to ollama: {params}")
```
- the first parameter is a category. there is a static list of
categories in `llama_stack/logcat.py`
- each category can be associated with a log-level which can be
configured via the `LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING` env var.
- a value `LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING=inference=debug;server=info"` does the
obvious thing. there is a special key called `all` which is an alias for
all categories
## Test Plan
Ran with `LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING="all=debug" llama stack run fireworks` and
saw the following:
Hit it with a client-sdk test case and saw this:
# What does this PR do?
We want to bundle a bunch of (typically remote) providers in a distro
template and be able to configure them "on the fly" via environment
variables. So far, we have been able to do this with simple env var
replacements. However, sometimes you want to only conditionally enable
providers (because the relevant remote services may not be alive, or
relevant.) This was not possible until now.
To aid this, we add a simple (bash-like) env var replacement
enhancement: `${env.FOO+bar}` evaluates to `bar` if the variable is SET
and evaluates to empty string if it is not. On top of that, we update
our main resolver to ignore any provider whose ID is null.
This allows using the distro like this:
```bash
llama stack run dev --env CHROMADB_URL=http://localhost:6001 --env ENABLE_CHROMADB=1
```
when only Chroma is UP. This disables the other `pgvector` provider in
the run configuration.
## Test Plan
Hard code `chromadb` as the vector io provider inside
`test_vector_io.py` and run:
```bash
LLAMA_STACK_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8321 pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/vector_io/ --embedding-model all-MiniLM-L6-v2
```
Summary:
This test is no longer relevant. We updated the default system prompt in
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1310, and system override
behavior is already unit-tested in test_prompt_adapter.py
Test Plan:
read
# What does this PR do?
Use @client_tool decorator instead of ClientTool
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -v tests/client-sdk/agents/test_agents.py --inference-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct"
```
<img width="1053" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d3ade884-ef42-494e-8028-3b09d9ef1978"
/>
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
- skip media tests for models that do not support media
- skip output_dimension tests for models that do not support it
- skip task_type tests for models that do not support it
- provide task_type for models that require it
## Test Plan
`LLAMA_STACK_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8321 pytest -v
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py --embedding-model ...`
This fixes release build failure
3796497240:
```
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
______ test_embedding_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-long-text-None] _______
llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py:166: in test_embedding_truncation_error
with pytest.raises(BadRequestError) as excinfo:
E Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
______ test_embedding_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-long-text-none] _______
llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py:166: in test_embedding_truncation_error
with pytest.raises(BadRequestError) as excinfo:
E Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
_______ test_embedding_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-long-str-None] _______
llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py:166: in test_embedding_truncation_error
with pytest.raises(BadRequestError) as excinfo:
E Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
_______ test_embedding_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-long-str-none] _______
llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py:166: in test_embedding_truncation_error
with pytest.raises(BadRequestError) as excinfo:
E Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
_________ test_embedding_text_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-NONE] _________
llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py:223: in test_embedding_text_truncation_error
with pytest.raises(BadRequestError) as excinfo:
E Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
_________ test_embedding_text_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-END] __________
llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py:223: in test_embedding_text_truncation_error
with pytest.raises(BadRequestError) as excinfo:
E Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
________ test_embedding_text_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-START] _________
llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py:223: in test_embedding_text_truncation_error
with pytest.raises(BadRequestError) as excinfo:
E Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
_________ test_embedding_text_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-left] _________
llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py:223: in test_embedding_text_truncation_error
with pytest.raises(BadRequestError) as excinfo:
E Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
________ test_embedding_text_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-right] _________
llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py:223: in test_embedding_text_truncation_error
with pytest.raises(BadRequestError) as excinfo:
E Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py::test_embedding_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-long-text-None] - Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
FAILED llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py::test_embedding_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-long-text-none] - Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
FAILED llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py::test_embedding_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-long-str-None] - Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
FAILED llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py::test_embedding_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-long-str-none] - Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
FAILED llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py::test_embedding_text_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-NONE] - Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
FAILED llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py::test_embedding_text_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-END] - Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
FAILED llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py::test_embedding_text_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-START] - Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
FAILED llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py::test_embedding_text_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-left] - Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
FAILED llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py::test_embedding_text_truncation_error[txt=8B:emb=MiniLM-right] - Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'llama_stack_client.BadRequestError'>
= 9 failed, 48 passed, 2 skipped, 3 deselected, 3 xfailed, 1 xpassed, 121 warnings in 90.16s (0:01:30) =
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
```
Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
updates nvidia inference provider's embedding implementation to use new
signature
add support for task_type, output_dimensions, text_truncation parameters
## Test Plan
`LLAMA_STACK_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8321 pytest -v
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embedding.py --embedding-model
baai/bge-m3`
Groq has never supported raw completions anyhow. So this makes it easier
to switch it to LiteLLM. All our test suite passes.
I also updated all the openai-compat providers so they work with api
keys passed from headers. `provider_data`
## Test Plan
```bash
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=groq \
pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--inference-model=groq/llama-3.3-70b-versatile --vision-inference-model=""
```
Also tested (openai, anthropic, gemini) providers. No regressions.
# What does this PR do?
No need to have complex tool prompt format related machinery in the
tests.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
```bash
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=ollama pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/inference/test_text_inference.py --inference-model=meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct --vision-inference-model=""
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
Tool format depends on the model. @ehhuang introduced a
`get_default_tool_prompt_format` function for this purpose. We should
use that instead of hacky model ID matching we had before.
Secondly, non llama models don't have this concept so testing with those
models should work as is.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
```bash
for distro in fireworks ollama; do
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=$distro \
pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--inference-model=meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct \
--vision-inference-model=""
done
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=dev \
pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--inference-model=openai/gpt-4o \
--vision-inference-model=""
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Summary:
Lets the model decide which tool it needs to call to respond to a query.
Test Plan:
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/ --safety-shield meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B
```
Also evaluated on a small benchmark with 20 questions from HotpotQA.
With this PR and some prompting, the performance is 77% recall compared
to 50% currently.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with
[ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1015).
* #1268
* #1239
* __->__ #1015
# What does this PR do?
This PR introduces more non-llama model support to llama stack.
Providers introduced: openai, anthropic and gemini. All of these
providers use essentially the same piece of code -- the implementation
works via the `litellm` library.
We will expose only specific models for providers we enable making sure
they all work well and pass tests. This setup (instead of automatically
enabling _all_ providers and models allowed by LiteLLM) ensures we can
also perform any needed prompt tuning on a per-model basis as needed
(just like we do it for llama models.)
## Test Plan
```bash
#!/bin/bash
args=("$@")
for model in openai/gpt-4o anthropic/claude-3-5-sonnet-latest gemini/gemini-1.5-flash; do
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=dev pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--embedding-model=all-MiniLM-L6-v2 \
--vision-inference-model="" \
--inference-model=$model "${args[@]}"
done
```
