# What does this PR do?
Add win platform run command for stack
- [x] Addresses issue (#issue)
## Test Plan
Please describe:
- tests you ran to verify your changes with result summaries.
- provide instructions so it can be reproduced.
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/889
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [x] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [x] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
It's a more generic term and applicable to alternatives of Docker, such
as Podman or other OCI-compliant technologies.
---------
Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
## What does this PR do?
So far `llama stack build` has always created a separate conda
environment for packaging the dependencies of a distribution. The main
reason to do so is isolation -- distributions are composed of providers
which can have a variety of potentially conflicting dependencies. That
said, this has created significant annoyance for new users since it is
not at all transparent. The fact that `llama stack run` is actually
running the code in some other conda is very surprising.
This PR tries to make things better.
- Both `llama stack build` and `llama stack run` now accept an
`--image-name` argument which represents the (conda, docker, virtualenv)
image you want to operate upon.
- For the default (conda) mode, the script checks if a current conda
environment exists. If one exists, it uses it.
- If `--image-name` is provided, that option is used. In this case, an
environment is created if needed.
- There is no automatic `llamastack-` prefixing of the environment names
done anymore.
## Test Plan
Start in a conda environment, run `llama stack build --template
fireworks`; verify that it successfully built into the current
environment and stored the build file at
`$CONDA_PREFIX/llamastack-build.yaml`. Run `llama stack run fireworks`
which started correctly in the current environment.
Ran the same build command outside of conda. It failed asking for
`--image-name`. Ran it with `llama stack build --template fireworks
--image-name foo`. This successfully created a conda environment called
`foo` and installed deps. Ran `llama stack run fireworks` outside conda
which failed. Activated a different conda, ran again, it failed saying
it did not find the `llamastack-build.yaml` file. Then used
`--image-name foo` option and it ran successfully.
# What does this PR do?
Rename environment var for consistency
## Test Plan
No regressions
## Sources
## Before submitting
- [X] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [X] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [X] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [X] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
---------
Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
This was missed in https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/706. I
tested `llama_stack.distribution.server.server` but didn't test `llama
stack run`. cc @ashwinb
Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
When running with dockers, the idea is that users be able to work purely
with the `llama stack` CLI. They should not need to know about the
existence of any YAMLs unless they need to. This PR enables it.
The docker command now doesn't need to volume mount a yaml and can
simply be:
```bash
docker run -v ~/.llama/:/root/.llama \
--env A=a --env B=b
```
## Test Plan
Check with conda first (no regressions):
```bash
LLAMA_STACK_DIR=. llama stack build --template ollama
llama stack run ollama --port 5001
# server starts up correctly
```
Check with docker
```bash
# build the docker
LLAMA_STACK_DIR=. llama stack build --template ollama --image-type docker
export INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct"
docker run -it -p 5001:5001 \
-v ~/.llama:/root/.llama \
-v $PWD:/app/llama-stack-source \
localhost/distribution-ollama:dev \
--port 5001 \
--env INFERENCE_MODEL=$INFERENCE_MODEL \
--env OLLAMA_URL=http://host.docker.internal:11434
```
Note that volume mounting to `/app/llama-stack-source` is only needed
because we built the docker with uncommitted source code.
# What does this PR do?
Automatically generates
- build.yaml
- run.yaml
- run-with-safety.yaml
- parts of markdown docs
for the distributions.
## Test Plan
At this point, this only updates the YAMLs and the docs. Some testing
(especially with ollama and vllm) has been performed but needs to be
much more tested.
**Summary:**
Extend the shorthand run command so it can run successfully when config
exists under DISTRIBS_BASE_DIR (i.e. ~/.llama/distributions).
For example, imagine you created a new stack using the `llama stack
build` command where you named it "my-awesome-llama-stack".
```
$ llama stack build
> Enter a name for your Llama Stack (e.g. my-local-stack): my-awesome-llama-stack
```
To run the stack you created you will have to use long config path:
```
llama stack run ~/.llama/distributions/llamastack-my-awesome-llama-stack/my-awesome-llama-stack-run.yaml
```
With this change, you can start it using the stack name instead of full
path:
```
llama stack run my-awesome-llama-stack
```
**Test Plan:**
Verify command fails when stack doesn't exist
```
python3 -m llama_stack.cli.llama stack run my-test-stack
```
Output [FAILURE]
```
usage: llama stack run [-h] [--port PORT] [--disable-ipv6] config
llama stack run: error: File /Users/vladimirivic/.llama/distributions/llamastack-my-test-stack/my-test-stack-run.yaml does not exist. Please run `llama stack build` to generate (and optionally edit) a run.yaml file
```
Create a new stack using `llama stack build`.
Name it `my-test-stack`.
Verify command runs successfully
```
python3 -m llama_stack.cli.llama stack run my-test-stack
```
Output [SUCCESS]
```
Listening on ['::', '0.0.0.0']:5000
INFO: Started server process [80146]
INFO: Waiting for application startup.
INFO: Application startup complete.
INFO: Uvicorn running on http://['::', '0.0.0.0']:5000 (Press CTRL+C to quit)
```
This PR makes several core changes to the developer experience surrounding Llama Stack.
Background: PR #92 introduced the notion of "routing" to the Llama Stack. It introduces three object types: (1) models, (2) shields and (3) memory banks. Each of these objects can be associated with a distinct provider. So you can get model A to be inferenced locally while model B, C can be inference remotely (e.g.)
However, this had a few drawbacks:
you could not address the provider instances -- i.e., if you configured "meta-reference" with a given model, you could not assign an identifier to this instance which you could re-use later.
the above meant that you could not register a "routing_key" (e.g. model) dynamically and say "please use this existing provider I have already configured" for a new model.
the terms "routing_table" and "routing_key" were exposed directly to the user. in my view, this is way too much overhead for a new user (which almost everyone is.) people come to the stack wanting to do ML and encounter a completely unexpected term.
What this PR does: This PR structures the run config with only a single prominent key:
- providers
Providers are instances of configured provider types. Here's an example which shows two instances of the remote::tgi provider which are serving two different models.
providers:
inference:
- provider_id: foo
provider_type: remote::tgi
config: { ... }
- provider_id: bar
provider_type: remote::tgi
config: { ... }
Secondly, the PR adds dynamic registration of { models | shields | memory_banks } to the API surface. The distribution still acts like a "routing table" (as previously) except that it asks the backing providers for a listing of these objects. For example it asks a TGI or Ollama inference adapter what models it is serving. Only the models that are being actually served can be requested by the user for inference. Otherwise, the Stack server will throw an error.
When dynamically registering these objects, you can use the provider IDs shown above. Info about providers can be obtained using the Api.inspect set of endpoints (/providers, /routes, etc.)
The above examples shows the correspondence between inference providers and models registry items. Things work similarly for the safety <=> shields and memory <=> memory_banks pairs.
Registry: This PR also makes it so that Providers need to implement additional methods for registering and listing objects. For example, each Inference provider is now expected to implement the ModelsProtocolPrivate protocol (naming is not great!) which consists of two methods
register_model
list_models
The goal is to inform the provider that a certain model needs to be supported so the provider can make any relevant backend changes if needed (or throw an error if the model cannot be supported.)
There are many other cleanups included some of which are detailed in a follow-up comment.
* add back wizard for build
* conda build path move
* polish message
* run with name only
* prompt for build
* improve comments
* update msgs
* add new lines
* move build.yaml
* address comments
* validator for providers
* move imports
* Please enter -> enter
* comments, get started guide
* nits
* fix cprint import
* fix imports
* API Keys passed from Client instead of distro configuration
* delete distribution registry
* Rename the "package" word away
* Introduce a "Router" layer for providers
Some providers need to be factorized and considered as thin routing
layers on top of other providers. Consider two examples:
- The inference API should be a routing layer over inference providers,
routed using the "model" key
- The memory banks API is another instance where various memory bank
types will be provided by independent providers (e.g., a vector store
is served by Chroma while a keyvalue memory can be served by Redis or
PGVector)
This commit introduces a generalized routing layer for this purpose.
* update `apis_to_serve`
* llama_toolchain -> llama_stack
* Codemod from llama_toolchain -> llama_stack
- added providers/registry
- cleaned up api/ subdirectories and moved impls away
- restructured api/api.py
- from llama_stack.apis.<api> import foo should work now
- update imports to do llama_stack.apis.<api>
- update many other imports
- added __init__, fixed some registry imports
- updated registry imports
- create_agentic_system -> create_agent
- AgenticSystem -> Agent
* Moved some stuff out of common/; re-generated OpenAPI spec
* llama-toolchain -> llama-stack (hyphens)
* add control plane API
* add redis adapter + sqlite provider
* move core -> distribution
* Some more toolchain -> stack changes
* small naming shenanigans
* Removing custom tool and agent utilities and moving them client side
* Move control plane to distribution server for now
* Remove control plane from API list
* no codeshield dependency randomly plzzzzz
* Add "fire" as a dependency
* add back event loggers
* stack configure fixes
* use brave instead of bing in the example client
* add init file so it gets packaged
* add init files so it gets packaged
* Update MANIFEST
* bug fix
---------
Co-authored-by: Hardik Shah <hjshah@fb.com>
Co-authored-by: Xi Yan <xiyan@meta.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin@meta.com>
2024-09-17 19:51:35 -07:00
Renamed from llama_toolchain/cli/stack/run.py (Browse further)
