This doesn't get Groq to 100% on the OpenAI API verification tests,
but it does get it to 88.2% when Llama Stack is in the middle,
compared to the 61.8% results for using an OpenAI client against Groq
directly.
The groq provider doesn't use litellm under the covers in its
openai_chat_completion endpoint, and instead directly uses an
AsyncOpenAI client with some special handling to improve conformance
of responses for response_format usage and tool calling.
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
## Test Plan
export MODEL=accounts/fireworks/models/llama4-scout-instruct-basic;
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=verification pytest -s -v tests/integration/inference
--vision-model $MODEL --text-model $MODEL
# What does this PR do?
## Test Plan
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=dev pytest -s -v
tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py::test_custom_tool
--safety-shield meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B --text-model
accounts/fireworks/models/llama-v3p1-8b-instruct
and verify trace in jaeger UI
https://llama-stack.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building_applications/telemetry.html#
Each model known to the system has two identifiers:
- the `provider_resource_id` (what the provider calls it) -- e.g.,
`accounts/fireworks/models/llama-v3p1-8b-instruct`
- the `identifier` (`model_id`) under which it is registered and gets
routed to the appropriate provider.
We have so far used the HuggingFace repo alias as the standardized
identifier you can use to refer to the model. So in the above example,
we'd use `meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct` as the name under which it
gets registered. This makes it convenient for users to refer to these
models across providers.
However, we forgot to register the _actual_ provider model ID also. You
should be able to route via `provider_resource_id` also, of course.
This change fixes this (somewhat grave) omission.
*Note*: this change is additive -- more aliases work now compared to
before.
## Test Plan
Run the following for distro=(ollama fireworks together)
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=$distro \
pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--inference-model=meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct --vision-inference-model=""
```
Groq has never supported raw completions anyhow. So this makes it easier
to switch it to LiteLLM. All our test suite passes.
I also updated all the openai-compat providers so they work with api
keys passed from headers. `provider_data`
## Test Plan
```bash
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=groq \
pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--inference-model=groq/llama-3.3-70b-versatile --vision-inference-model=""
```
Also tested (openai, anthropic, gemini) providers. No regressions.
# What does this PR do?
Create a distribution template using Groq as inference provider.
Link to issue: https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/958
## Test Plan
Run `python llama_stack/scripts/distro_codegen.py` to generate run.yaml
and build.yaml
Test the newly created template by running
`llama stack build --template <template-name>`
`llama stack run <template-name>`
