# What does this PR do?
In short, provide a summary of what this PR does and why. Usually, the
relevant context should be present in a linked issue.
- [x] Addresses issue (#548)
## Test Plan
Please describe:
No automated tests. Clicked on each link to ensure I was directed to the
right page.
## Sources
## Before submitting
- [x] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [x] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [x] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [x] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] ~Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.~
# What does this PR do?
- updated the notebooks to reflect past changes up to llama-stack 0.0.53
- updated readme to provide accurate and up-to-date info
- improve the current zero to hero by integrating an example using
together api
## Before submitting
- [x] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [x] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [x] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sanyam Bhutani <sanyambhutani@meta.com>
# What does this PR do?
Fix the instruction in quickstart readme so the new developers/users can
run it without issues.
## Test Plan
None
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
## Before submitting
- [X] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [X] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [X] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
Co-authored-by: Henry Tai <henrytai@fb.com>
# What does this PR do?
It shows a complete zero-setup Colab using the Llama Stack server
implemented and powered by together.ai: using Llama Stack Client API to
run inference, agent and 3.2 models. Good for a quick start guide.
- [ ] Addresses issue (#issue)
## Test Plan
Please describe:
- tests you ran to verify your changes with result summaries.
- provide instructions so it can be reproduced.
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [ ] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
# What does this PR do?
This PR kills the notion of "ShieldType". The impetus for this is the
realization:
> Why is keyword llama-guard appearing so many times everywhere,
sometimes with hyphens, sometimes with underscores?
Now that we have a notion of "provider specific resource identifiers"
and "user specific aliases" for those and the fact that this works with
models ("Llama3.1-8B-Instruct" <> "fireworks/llama-3pv1-..."), we can
follow the same rules for Shields.
So each Safety provider can make up a notion of identifiers it has
registered. This already happens with Bedrock correctly. We just
generalize it for Llama Guard, Prompt Guard, etc.
For Llama Guard, we further simplify by just adopting the underlying
model name itself as the identifier! No confusion necessary.
While doing this, I noticed a bug in our DistributionRegistry where we
weren't scoping identifiers by type. Fixed.
## Feature/Issue validation/testing/test plan
Ran (inference, safety, memory, agents) tests with ollama and fireworks
providers.
