# What does this PR do?
The goal of this PR is code base modernization.
Schema reflection code needed a minor adjustment to handle UnionTypes
and collections.abc.AsyncIterator. (Both are preferred for latest Python
releases.)
Note to reviewers: almost all changes here are automatically generated
by pyupgrade. Some additional unused imports were cleaned up. The only
change worth of note can be found under `docs/openapi_generator` and
`llama_stack/strong_typing/schema.py` where reflection code was updated
to deal with "newer" types.
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
- Removed Optional return types for GET methods
- Raised ValueError when requested resource is not found
- Ensures proper 4xx response for missing resources
- Updated the API generator to check for wrong signatures
```
$ uv run --with ".[dev]" ./docs/openapi_generator/run_openapi_generator.sh
Validating API method return types...
API Method Return Type Validation Errors:
Method ScoringFunctions.get_scoring_function returns Optional type
```
Closes: https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/1630
## Test Plan
Run the server then:
```
curl http://127.0.0.1:8321/v1/models/foo
{"detail":"Invalid value: Model 'foo' not found"}%
```
Server log:
```
INFO: 127.0.0.1:52307 - "GET /v1/models/foo HTTP/1.1" 400 Bad Request
09:51:42.654 [END] /v1/models/foo [StatusCode.OK] (134.65ms)
09:51:42.651 [ERROR] Error executing endpoint route='/v1/models/{model_id:path}' method='get'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py", line 193, in endpoint
return await maybe_await(value)
File "/Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py", line 156, in maybe_await
return await value
File "/Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/llama_stack/providers/utils/telemetry/trace_protocol.py", line 102, in async_wrapper
result = await method(self, *args, **kwargs)
File "/Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/routers/routing_tables.py", line 217, in get_model
raise ValueError(f"Model '{model_id}' not found")
ValueError: Model 'foo' not found
```
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
llama-models should have extremely minimal cruft. Its sole purpose
should be didactic -- show the simplest implementation of the llama
models and document the prompt formats, etc.
This PR is the complement to
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/pull/279
## Test Plan
Ensure all `llama` CLI `model` sub-commands work:
```bash
llama model list
llama model download --model-id ...
llama model prompt-format -m ...
```
Ran tests:
```bash
cd tests/client-sdk
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v inference/
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v vector_io/
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v agents/
```
Create a fresh venv `uv venv && source .venv/bin/activate` and run
`llama stack build --template fireworks --image-type venv` followed by
`llama stack run together --image-type venv` <-- the server runs
Also checked that the OpenAPI generator can run and there is no change
in the generated files as a result.
```bash
cd docs/openapi_generator
sh run_openapi_generator.sh
```
# What does this PR do?
This PR changes our API to follow more idiomatic REST API approaches of
having paths being resources and methods indicating the action being
performed.
Changes made to generator:
1) removed the prefix check of "get" as its not required and is actually
needed for other method types too
2) removed _ check on path since variables can have "_"
## Test Plan
LLAMA_STACK_BASE_URL=http://localhost:5000 pytest -v
tests/client-sdk/agents/test_agents.py
# What does this PR do?
Change the Telemetry API to be able to support different use cases like
returning traces for the UI and ability to export for Evals.
Other changes:
* Add a new trace_protocol decorator to decorate all our API methods so
that any call to them will automatically get traced across all impls.
* There is some issue with the decorator pattern of span creation when
using async generators, where there are multiple yields with in the same
context. I think its much more explicit by using the explicit context
manager pattern using with. I moved the span creations in agent instance
to be using with
* Inject session id at the turn level, which should quickly give us all
traces across turns for a given session
Addresses #509
## Test Plan
```
llama stack run /Users/dineshyv/.llama/distributions/llamastack-together/together-run.yaml
PYTHONPATH=. python -m examples.agents.rag_with_memory_bank localhost 5000
curl -X POST 'http://localhost:5000/alpha/telemetry/query-traces' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{
"attribute_filters": [
{
"key": "session_id",
"op": "eq",
"value": "dd667b87-ca4b-4d30-9265-5a0de318fc65" }],
"limit": 100,
"offset": 0,
"order_by": ["start_time"]
}' | jq .
[
{
"trace_id": "6902f54b83b4b48be18a6f422b13e16f",
"root_span_id": "5f37b85543afc15a",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:30.501587",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:36.026463"
},
{
"trace_id": "92227dac84c0615ed741be393813fb5f",
"root_span_id": "af7c5bb46665c2c8",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:36.031170",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:41.693301"
},
{
"trace_id": "7d578a6edac62f204ab479fba82f77b6",
"root_span_id": "1d935e3362676896",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:41.695204",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:47.228016"
},
{
"trace_id": "dbd767d76991bc816f9f078907dc9ff2",
"root_span_id": "f5a7ee76683b9602",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:47.234578",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:53.189412"
}
]
curl -X POST 'http://localhost:5000/alpha/telemetry/get-span-tree' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{ "span_id" : "6cceb4b48a156913", "max_depth": 2, "attributes_to_return": ["input"] }' | jq .
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 875 100 790 100 85 18462 1986 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 20833
{
"span_id": "6cceb4b48a156913",
"trace_id": "dafa796f6aaf925f511c04cd7c67fdda",
"parent_span_id": "892a66d726c7f990",
"name": "retrieve_rag_context",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T09:28:21.781995",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T09:28:21.913352",
"attributes": {
"input": [
"{\"role\":\"system\",\"content\":\"You are a helpful assistant\"}",
"{\"role\":\"user\",\"content\":\"What are the top 5 topics that were explained in the documentation? Only list succinct bullet points.\",\"context\":null}"
]
},
"children": [
{
"span_id": "1a2df181854064a8",
"trace_id": "dafa796f6aaf925f511c04cd7c67fdda",
"parent_span_id": "6cceb4b48a156913",
"name": "MemoryRouter.query_documents",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T09:28:21.787620",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T09:28:21.906512",
"attributes": {
"input": null
},
"children": [],
"status": "ok"
}
],
"status": "ok"
}
```
<img width="1677" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-04 at 9 42 56 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4d3cea93-05ce-415a-93d9-4b1628631bf8">
# What does this PR do?
This PR kills the notion of "ShieldType". The impetus for this is the
realization:
> Why is keyword llama-guard appearing so many times everywhere,
sometimes with hyphens, sometimes with underscores?
Now that we have a notion of "provider specific resource identifiers"
and "user specific aliases" for those and the fact that this works with
models ("Llama3.1-8B-Instruct" <> "fireworks/llama-3pv1-..."), we can
follow the same rules for Shields.
So each Safety provider can make up a notion of identifiers it has
registered. This already happens with Bedrock correctly. We just
generalize it for Llama Guard, Prompt Guard, etc.
For Llama Guard, we further simplify by just adopting the underlying
model name itself as the identifier! No confusion necessary.
While doing this, I noticed a bug in our DistributionRegistry where we
weren't scoping identifiers by type. Fixed.
## Feature/Issue validation/testing/test plan
Ran (inference, safety, memory, agents) tests with ollama and fireworks
providers.
# What does this PR do?
This is a follow-up to #425. That PR allows for specifying models in the
registry, but each entry needs to look like:
```yaml
- identifier: ...
provider_id: ...
provider_resource_identifier: ...
```
This is headache-inducing.
The current PR makes this situation better by adopting the shape of our
APIs. Namely, we need the user to only specify `model-id`. The rest
should be optional and figured out by the Stack. You can always override
it.
Here's what example `ollama` "full stack" registry looks like (we still
need to kill or simplify shield_type crap):
```yaml
models:
- model_id: Llama3.2-3B-Instruct
- model_id: Llama-Guard-3-1B
shields:
- shield_id: llama_guard
shield_type: llama_guard
```
## Test Plan
See test plan for #425. Re-ran it.
* init
* working bedrock tests
* bedrock test for inference fixes
* use env vars for bedrock guardrail vars
* add register in meta reference
* use correct shield impl in meta ref
* dont add together fixture
* right naming
* minor updates
* improved registration flow
* address feedback
---------
Co-authored-by: Dinesh Yeduguru <dineshyv@fb.com>
* persist registered objects with distribution
* linter fixes
* comment
* use annotate and field discriminator
* workign tests
* donot use global state
* precommit failures fixed
* add back Any
* fix imports
* remove unnecessary changes in ollama
* precommit failures fixed
* make kvstore configurable for dist and rename registry
* add comment about registry list return
* fix linter errors
* use registry to hydrate
* remove debug print
* linter fixes
* remove kvstore.db
* rename distribution_registry_store
---------
Co-authored-by: Dinesh Yeduguru <dineshyv@fb.com>
This PR makes several core changes to the developer experience surrounding Llama Stack.
Background: PR #92 introduced the notion of "routing" to the Llama Stack. It introduces three object types: (1) models, (2) shields and (3) memory banks. Each of these objects can be associated with a distinct provider. So you can get model A to be inferenced locally while model B, C can be inference remotely (e.g.)
However, this had a few drawbacks:
you could not address the provider instances -- i.e., if you configured "meta-reference" with a given model, you could not assign an identifier to this instance which you could re-use later.
the above meant that you could not register a "routing_key" (e.g. model) dynamically and say "please use this existing provider I have already configured" for a new model.
the terms "routing_table" and "routing_key" were exposed directly to the user. in my view, this is way too much overhead for a new user (which almost everyone is.) people come to the stack wanting to do ML and encounter a completely unexpected term.
What this PR does: This PR structures the run config with only a single prominent key:
- providers
Providers are instances of configured provider types. Here's an example which shows two instances of the remote::tgi provider which are serving two different models.
providers:
inference:
- provider_id: foo
provider_type: remote::tgi
config: { ... }
- provider_id: bar
provider_type: remote::tgi
config: { ... }
Secondly, the PR adds dynamic registration of { models | shields | memory_banks } to the API surface. The distribution still acts like a "routing table" (as previously) except that it asks the backing providers for a listing of these objects. For example it asks a TGI or Ollama inference adapter what models it is serving. Only the models that are being actually served can be requested by the user for inference. Otherwise, the Stack server will throw an error.
When dynamically registering these objects, you can use the provider IDs shown above. Info about providers can be obtained using the Api.inspect set of endpoints (/providers, /routes, etc.)
The above examples shows the correspondence between inference providers and models registry items. Things work similarly for the safety <=> shields and memory <=> memory_banks pairs.
Registry: This PR also makes it so that Providers need to implement additional methods for registering and listing objects. For example, each Inference provider is now expected to implement the ModelsProtocolPrivate protocol (naming is not great!) which consists of two methods
register_model
list_models
The goal is to inform the provider that a certain model needs to be supported so the provider can make any relevant backend changes if needed (or throw an error if the model cannot be supported.)
There are many other cleanups included some of which are detailed in a follow-up comment.
This is yet another of those large PRs (hopefully we will have less and less of them as things mature fast). This one introduces substantial improvements and some simplifications to the stack.
Most important bits:
* Agents reference implementation now has support for session / turn persistence. The default implementation uses sqlite but there's also support for using Redis.
* We have re-architected the structure of the Stack APIs to allow for more flexible routing. The motivating use cases are:
- routing model A to ollama and model B to a remote provider like Together
- routing shield A to local impl while shield B to a remote provider like Bedrock
- routing a vector memory bank to Weaviate while routing a keyvalue memory bank to Redis
* Support for provider specific parameters to be passed from the clients. A client can pass data using `x_llamastack_provider_data` parameter which can be type-checked and provided to the Adapter implementations.
