Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Francisco Arceo
a20e8eac8c
feat: Add OpenAI Conversations API (#3429)
# What does this PR do?

Initial implementation for `Conversations` and `ConversationItems` using
`AuthorizedSqlStore` with endpoints to:
- CREATE
- UPDATE
- GET/RETRIEVE/LIST
- DELETE

Set `level=LLAMA_STACK_API_V1`.

NOTE: This does not currently incorporate changes for Responses, that'll
be done in a subsequent PR.

Closes https://github.com/llamastack/llama-stack/issues/3235

## Test Plan
- Unit tests
- Integration tests

Also comparison of [OpenAPI spec for OpenAI
API](https://github.com/openai/openai-openapi/tree/manual_spec)
```bash
oasdiff breaking --fail-on ERR docs/static/llama-stack-spec.yaml https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openai/openai-openapi/refs/heads/manual_spec/openapi.yaml --strip-prefix-base "/v1/openai/v1" \
--match-path '(^/v1/openai/v1/conversations.*|^/conversations.*)'
```

Note I still have some uncertainty about this, I borrowed this info from
@cdoern on https://github.com/llamastack/llama-stack/pull/3514 but need
to spend more time to confirm it's working, at the moment it suggests it
does.

UPDATE on `oasdiff`, I investigated the OpenAI spec further and it looks
like currently the spec does not list Conversations, so that analysis is
useless. Noting for future reference.

---------

Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Arceo <farceo@redhat.com>
2025-10-03 08:47:18 -07:00
Ashwin Bharambe
ef0736527d
feat(tools)!: substantial clean up of "Tool" related datatypes (#3627)
This is a sweeping change to clean up some gunk around our "Tool"
definitions.

First, we had two types `Tool` and `ToolDef`. The first of these was a
"Resource" type for the registry but we had stopped registering tools
inside the Registry long back (and only registered ToolGroups.) The
latter was for specifying tools for the Agents API. This PR removes the
former and adds an optional `toolgroup_id` field to the latter.

Secondly, as pointed out by @bbrowning in
https://github.com/llamastack/llama-stack/pull/3003#issuecomment-3245270132,
we were doing a lossy conversion from a full JSON schema from the MCP
tool specification into our ToolDefinition to send it to the model.
There is no necessity to do this -- we ourselves aren't doing any
execution at all but merely passing it to the chat completions API which
supports this. By doing this (and by doing it poorly), we encountered
limitations like not supporting array items, or not resolving $refs,
etc.

To fix this, we replaced the `parameters` field by `{ input_schema,
output_schema }` which can be full blown JSON schemas.

Finally, there were some types in our llama-related chat format
conversion which needed some cleanup. We are taking this opportunity to
clean those up.

This PR is a substantial breaking change to the API. However, given our
window for introducing breaking changes, this suits us just fine. I will
be landing a concurrent `llama-stack-client` change as well since API
shapes are changing.
2025-10-02 15:12:03 -07:00
Ashwin Bharambe
6afa96b0b9 fix(api): fix a mistake from #3636 which overwrote POST /responses 2025-10-02 13:03:17 -07:00
Alexey Rybak
24ee577cb0
docs: API spec generation for Stainless (#3655)
# What does this PR do?
* Adds stainless-llama-stack-spec.yaml for Stainless client generation,
which comprises stable + experimental APIs

## Test Plan
* Manual generation
2025-10-02 09:25:09 -07:00