# What does this PR do?
Adds try-catch to faiss `query_vector` function for when the distance
between the query embedding and an embedding within the vector db is 0
(identical vectors). Catches `ZeroDivisionError` and then appends `(1.0
/ sys.float_info.min)` to `scores` to represent maximum similarity.
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
Closes [#2381]
## Test Plan
Checkout this PR
Execute this code and there will no longer be a `ZeroDivisionError`
exception
```
from llama_stack_client import LlamaStackClient
base_url = "http://localhost:8321"
client = LlamaStackClient(base_url=base_url)
models = client.models.list()
embedding_model = (
em := next(m for m in models if m.model_type == "embedding")
).identifier
embedding_dimension = 384
_ = client.vector_dbs.register(
vector_db_id="foo_db",
embedding_model=embedding_model,
embedding_dimension=embedding_dimension,
provider_id="faiss",
)
chunk = {
"content": "foo",
"mime_type": "text/plain",
"metadata": {
"document_id": "foo-id"
}
}
client.vector_io.insert(vector_db_id="foo_db", chunks=[chunk])
client.vector_io.query(vector_db_id="foo_db", query="foo")
```
### Running unit tests
`uv run pytest tests/unit/rag/test_rag_query.py -v`
---------
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
<!-- Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to
relevant issues if applicable. -->
To add health status check for remote VLLM
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
PR includes the unit test to test the added health check implementation
feature.
The non-streaming version is just a small layer on top of the streaming
version - just pluck off the final `response.completed` event and return
that as the response!
This PR also includes a couple other changes which I ended up making
while working on it on a flight:
- changes to `ollama` so it does not pull embedding models
unconditionally
- a small fix to library client to make the stream and non-stream cases
a bit more symmetric
This allows a set of rules to be defined for determining access to
resources. The rules are (loosely) based on the cedar policy format.
A rule defines a list of action either to permit or to forbid. It may
specify a principal or a resource that must match for the rule to take
effect. It may also specify a condition, either a 'when' or an 'unless',
with additional constraints as to where the rule applies.
A list of rules is held for each type to be protected and tried in order
to find a match. If a match is found, the request is permitted or
forbidden depening on the type of rule. If no match is found, the
request is denied. If no rules are specified for a given type, a rule
that allows any action as long as the resource attributes match the user
attributes is added (i.e. the previous behaviour is the default.
Some examples in yaml:
```
model:
- permit:
principal: user-1
actions: [create, read, delete]
comment: user-1 has full access to all models
- permit:
principal: user-2
actions: [read]
resource: model-1
comment: user-2 has read access to model-1 only
- permit:
actions: [read]
when:
user_in: resource.namespaces
comment: any user has read access to models with matching attributes
vector_db:
- forbid:
actions: [create, read, delete]
unless:
user_in: role::admin
comment: only user with admin role can use vector_db resources
```
---------
Signed-off-by: Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This adds the missing `text` parameter to the Responses API that is how
users control structured outputs. All we do with that parameter is map
it to the corresponding chat completion response_format.
## Test Plan
The new unit tests exercise the various permutations allowed for this
property, while a couple of new verification tests actually use it for
real to verify the model outputs are following the format as expected.
Unit tests:
`python -m pytest -s -v
tests/unit/providers/agents/meta_reference/test_openai_responses.py`
Verification tests:
```
llama stack run llama_stack/templates/together/run.yaml
pytest -s -vv 'tests/verifications/openai_api/test_responses.py' \
--base-url=http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1 \
--model meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct
```
Note that the verification tests can only be run with a real Llama Stack
server (as opposed to using the library client via
`--provider=stack:together`) because the Llama Stack python client is
not yet updated to accept this text field.
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
I think the implementation needs more simplification. Spent way too much
time trying to get the tests pass with models not co-operating :(
Finally had to switch claude-sonnet to get things to pass reliably.
### Test Plan
```
export TAVILY_SEARCH_API_KEY=...
export OPENAI_API_KEY=...
uv run pytest -p no:warnings \
-s -v tests/verifications/openai_api/test_responses.py \
--provider=stack:starter \
--model openai/gpt-4o
```
# What does this PR do?
The remote-vllm `test_chat_completion_doesnt_block_event_loop` unit test
was often failing for me on a Mac with a `httpx.ReadError`. I traced
this back to the swap to the `AsyncOpenAI` client in the remote-vllm
provider as where this started, and it looks like the async client needs
a bit more accurate HTTP request handling from our mock server.
So, this fixes that unit test to send proper Content-Type and
Content-Length headers which makes the `AsyncOpenAI` client happier on
Macs.
## Test Plan
All the test_remote_vllm.py unit tests consistently pass for me on a Mac
now, without any flaking in the event loop one.
`pytest -s -v tests/unit/providers/inference/test_remote_vllm.py`
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
We must store the full (re-hydrated) input not just the original input
in the Response object. Of course, this is not very space efficient and
we should likely find a better storage scheme so that we can only store
unique entries in the database and then re-hydrate them efficiently
later. But that can be done safely later.
Closes https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/2299
## Test Plan
Unit test
This adds initial streaming support to the Responses API.
This PR makes sure that the _first_ inference call made to chat
completions streams out.
There's more to be done:
- tool call output tokens need to stream out when possible
- we need to loop through multiple rounds of inference and they all need
to stream out.
## Test Plan
Added a test. Executed as:
```
FIREWORKS_API_KEY=... \
pytest -s -v 'tests/verifications/openai_api/test_responses.py' \
--provider=stack:fireworks --model meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct
```
Then, started a llama stack fireworks distro and tested against it like
this:
```
OPENAI_API_KEY=blah \
pytest -s -v 'tests/verifications/openai_api/test_responses.py' \
--base-url http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1 \
--model meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct
```
# What does this PR do?
This is not part of the official OpenAI API, but we'll use this for the
logs UI.
In order to support more filtering options, I'm adopting the newly
introduced sql store in in place of the kv store.
## Test Plan
Added integration/unit tests.
# What does this PR do?
This PR introduces support for keyword based FTS5 search with BM25
relevance scoring. It makes changes to the existing EmbeddingIndex base
class in order to support a search_mode and query_str parameter, that
can be used for keyword based search implementations.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
run
```
pytest llama_stack/providers/tests/vector_io/test_sqlite_vec.py -v -s --tb=short --disable-warnings --asyncio-mode=auto
```
Output:
```
pytest llama_stack/providers/tests/vector_io/test_sqlite_vec.py -v -s --tb=short --disable-warnings --asyncio-mode=auto
/Users/vnarsing/miniconda3/envs/stack-client/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pytest_asyncio/plugin.py:207: PytestDeprecationWarning: The configuration option "asyncio_default_fixture_loop_scope" is unset.
The event loop scope for asynchronous fixtures will default to the fixture caching scope. Future versions of pytest-asyncio will default the loop scope for asynchronous fixtures to function scope. Set the default fixture loop scope explicitly in order to avoid unexpected behavior in the future. Valid fixture loop scopes are: "function", "class", "module", "package", "session"
warnings.warn(PytestDeprecationWarning(_DEFAULT_FIXTURE_LOOP_SCOPE_UNSET))
====================================================== test session starts =======================================================
platform darwin -- Python 3.10.16, pytest-8.3.4, pluggy-1.5.0 -- /Users/vnarsing/miniconda3/envs/stack-client/bin/python
cachedir: .pytest_cache
metadata: {'Python': '3.10.16', 'Platform': 'macOS-14.7.4-arm64-arm-64bit', 'Packages': {'pytest': '8.3.4', 'pluggy': '1.5.0'}, 'Plugins': {'html': '4.1.1', 'metadata': '3.1.1', 'asyncio': '0.25.3', 'anyio': '4.8.0'}}
rootdir: /Users/vnarsing/go/src/github/meta-llama/llama-stack
configfile: pyproject.toml
plugins: html-4.1.1, metadata-3.1.1, asyncio-0.25.3, anyio-4.8.0
asyncio: mode=auto, asyncio_default_fixture_loop_scope=None
collected 7 items
llama_stack/providers/tests/vector_io/test_sqlite_vec.py::test_add_chunks PASSED
llama_stack/providers/tests/vector_io/test_sqlite_vec.py::test_query_chunks_vector PASSED
llama_stack/providers/tests/vector_io/test_sqlite_vec.py::test_query_chunks_fts PASSED
llama_stack/providers/tests/vector_io/test_sqlite_vec.py::test_chunk_id_conflict PASSED
llama_stack/providers/tests/vector_io/test_sqlite_vec.py::test_register_vector_db PASSED
llama_stack/providers/tests/vector_io/test_sqlite_vec.py::test_unregister_vector_db PASSED
llama_stack/providers/tests/vector_io/test_sqlite_vec.py::test_generate_chunk_id PASSED
```
For reference, with the implementation, the fts table looks like below:
```
Chunk ID: 9fbc39ce-c729-64a2-260f-c5ec9bb2a33e, Content: Sentence 0 from document 0
Chunk ID: 94062914-3e23-44cf-1e50-9e25821ba882, Content: Sentence 1 from document 0
Chunk ID: e6cfd559-4641-33ba-6ce1-7038226495eb, Content: Sentence 2 from document 0
Chunk ID: 1383af9b-f1f0-f417-4de5-65fe9456cc20, Content: Sentence 3 from document 0
Chunk ID: 2db19b1a-de14-353b-f4e1-085e8463361c, Content: Sentence 4 from document 0
Chunk ID: 9faf986a-f028-7714-068a-1c795e8f2598, Content: Sentence 5 from document 0
Chunk ID: ef593ead-5a4a-392f-7ad8-471a50f033e8, Content: Sentence 6 from document 0
Chunk ID: e161950f-021f-7300-4d05-3166738b94cf, Content: Sentence 7 from document 0
Chunk ID: 90610fc4-67c1-e740-f043-709c5978867a, Content: Sentence 8 from document 0
Chunk ID: 97712879-6fff-98ad-0558-e9f42e6b81d3, Content: Sentence 9 from document 0
Chunk ID: aea70411-51df-61ba-d2f0-cb2b5972c210, Content: Sentence 0 from document 1
Chunk ID: b678a463-7b84-92b8-abb2-27e9a1977e3c, Content: Sentence 1 from document 1
Chunk ID: 27bd63da-909c-1606-a109-75bdb9479882, Content: Sentence 2 from document 1
Chunk ID: a2ad49ad-f9be-5372-e0c7-7b0221d0b53e, Content: Sentence 3 from document 1
Chunk ID: cac53bcd-1965-082a-c0f4-ceee7323fc70, Content: Sentence 4 from document 1
```
Query results:
Result 1: Sentence 5 from document 0
Result 2: Sentence 5 from document 1
Result 3: Sentence 5 from document 2
[//]: # (## Documentation)
---------
Signed-off-by: Varsha Prasad Narsing <varshaprasad96@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
Add support for "instructions" to the responses API. Instructions
provide a way to swap out system (or developer) messages in new
responses.
## Test Plan
unit tests added
Signed-off-by: Derek Higgins <derekh@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
When launching a fine-tuning job, an upcoming version of NeMo Customizer
will expect the `config` name to be formatted as
`namespace/name@version`. Here, `config` is a reference to a model +
additional metadata. There could be multiple `config`s that reference
the same base model.
This PR updates NVIDIA's `supervised_fine_tune` to simply pass the
`model` param as-is to NeMo Customizer. Currently, it expects a
specific, allowlisted llama model (i.e. `meta/Llama3.1-8B-Instruct`) and
converts it to the provider format (`meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct`).
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
From a notebook, I built an image with my changes:
```
!llama stack build --template nvidia --image-type venv
from llama_stack.distribution.library_client import LlamaStackAsLibraryClient
client = LlamaStackAsLibraryClient("nvidia")
client.initialize()
```
And could successfully launch a job:
```
response = client.post_training.supervised_fine_tune(
job_uuid="",
model="meta/llama-3.2-1b-instruct@v1.0.0+A100", # Model passed as-is to Customimzer
...
)
job_id = response.job_uuid
print(f"Created job with ID: {job_id}")
Output:
Created job with ID: cust-Jm4oGmbwcvoufaLU4XkrRU
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
---------
Co-authored-by: Jash Gulabrai <jgulabrai@nvidia.com>
# What does this PR do?
This fixes an issue in how we used the tool_call_buf from streaming tool
calls in the remote-vllm provider where it would end up concatenating
parameters from multiple different tool call results instead of
aggregating the results from each tool call separately.
It also fixes an issue found while digging into that where we were
accidentally mixing the json string form of tool call parameters with
the string representation of the python form, which mean we'd end up
with single quotes in what should be double-quoted json strings.
Closes#1120
## Test Plan
The following tests are now passing 100% for the remote-vllm provider,
where some of the test_text_inference were failing before this change:
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" INFERENCE_MODEL="RedHatAI/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct-FP8-dynamic" LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=remote-vllm python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py --text-model "RedHatAI/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct-FP8-dynamic"
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" INFERENCE_MODEL="RedHatAI/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct-FP8-dynamic" LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=remote-vllm python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_vision_inference.py --vision-model "RedHatAI/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct-FP8-dynamic"
```
All but one of the agent tests are passing (including the multi-tool
one). See the PR at https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/17917 and
a gist at
https://gist.github.com/bbrowning/4734240ce96b4264340caa9584e47c9e for
changes needed there, which will have to get made upstream in vLLM.
Agent tests:
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" INFERENCE_MODEL="RedHatAI/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct-FP8-dynamic" LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=remote-vllm python -m pytest -v tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --text-model "RedHatAI/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct-FP8-dynamic"
````
---------
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
In the Responses API, we convert incoming response requests to chat
completion requests. When streaming the resulting chunks of those chat
completion requests, inference providers that use OpenAI clients will
often return a `type=None` value in the tool call parts of the response.
This causes issues when we try to dump and load that response into our
pydantic model, because type cannot be None in the Responses API model
we're loading these into.
So, strip the "type" field, if present, off those chat completion tool
call results before dumping and loading them as our typed pydantic
models, which will apply our default value for that type field.
## Test Plan
This was found via manual testing of the Responses API with codex, where
I was getting errors in some tool call situations. I added a unit test
to simulate this scenario and verify the fix, as well as manual codex
testing to verify the fix.
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
Closes#2113.
Closes#1783.
Fixes a bug in handling the end of tool execution request stream where
no `finish_reason` is provided by the model.
## Test Plan
1. Ran existing unit tests
2. Added a dedicated test verifying correct behavior in this edge case
3. Ran the code snapshot from #2113
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
Closes#2111.
Fixes an error causing Llama Stack to just return `<tool_call>` and
complete the turn without actually executing the tool. See the issue
description for more detail.
## Test Plan
1) Ran existing unit tests
2) Added a dedicated test verifying correct behavior in this edge case
3) Ran the code snapshot from #2111
# What does this PR do?
This is a combination of what was previously 3 separate PRs - #2069,
#2075, and #2083. It turns out all 3 of those are needed to land a
working function calling Responses implementation. The web search
builtin tool was already working, but this wires in support for custom
function calling.
I ended up combining all three into one PR because they all had lots of
merge conflicts, both with each other but also with #1806 that just
landed. And, because landing any of them individually would have only
left a partially working implementation merged.
The new things added here are:
* Storing of input items from previous responses and restoring of those
input items when adding previous responses to the conversation state
* Handling of multiple input item messages roles, not just "user"
messages.
* Support for custom tools passed into the Responses API to enable
function calling outside of just the builtin websearch tool.
Closes#2074Closes#2080
## Test Plan
### Unit Tests
Several new unit tests were added, and they all pass. Ran via:
```
python -m pytest -s -v tests/unit/providers/agents/meta_reference/test_openai_responses.py
```
### Responses API Verification Tests
I ran our verification run.yaml against multiple providers to ensure we
were getting a decent pass rate. Specifically, I ensured the new custom
tool verification test passed across multiple providers and that the
multi-turn examples passed across at least some of the providers (some
providers struggle with the multi-turn workflows still).
Running the stack setup for verification testing:
```
llama stack run --image-type venv tests/verifications/openai-api-verification-run.yaml
```
Together, passing 100% as an example:
```
pytest -s -v 'tests/verifications/openai_api/test_responses.py' --provider=together-llama-stack
```
## Documentation
We will need to start documenting the OpenAI APIs, but for now the
Responses stuff is still rapidly evolving so delaying that.
---------
Signed-off-by: Derek Higgins <derekh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Derek Higgins <derekh@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
Checks for RAGDocument of type InterleavedContent
I noticed when stepping through the code that the supported types for
`RAGDocument` included `InterleavedContent` as a content type. This type
is not checked against before putting the `doc.content` is regex matched
against. This would cause a runtime error. This change adds an explicit
check for type.
The only other part that I'm unclear on is how to handle the
`ImageContent` type since this would always just return `<image>` which
seems like an undesired behavior. Should the `InterleavedContent` type
be removed from `RAGDocument` and replaced with `URI | str`?
## Test Plan
[//]: # (## Documentation)
---------
Signed-off-by: Kevin <kpostlet@redhat.com>
Add fixtures for SqliteKVStore, DiskDistributionRegistry and
CachedDiskDistributionRegistry. And use them in tests that had all been
duplicating similar setups.
## Test Plan
unit tests continue to run
Signed-off-by: Derek Higgins <derekh@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
When converting OpenAI message content for the "system" and "assistant"
roles to Llama Stack inference APIs (used for some providers when
dealing with Llama models via OpenAI API requests to get proper prompt /
tool handling), we were not properly converting any non-string content.
I discovered this while running the new Responses AI verification suite
against the Fireworks provider, but instead of fixing it as part of some
ongoing work there split this out into a separate PR.
This fixes that, by using the `openai_content_to_content` helper we used
elsewhere to ensure content parts were mapped properly.
## Test Plan
I added a couple of new tests to `test_openai_compat` to reproduce this
issue and validate its fix. I ran those as below:
```
python -m pytest -s -v tests/unit/providers/utils/inference/test_openai_compat.py
```
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
The goal of this PR is code base modernization.
Schema reflection code needed a minor adjustment to handle UnionTypes
and collections.abc.AsyncIterator. (Both are preferred for latest Python
releases.)
Note to reviewers: almost all changes here are automatically generated
by pyupgrade. Some additional unused imports were cleaned up. The only
change worth of note can be found under `docs/openapi_generator` and
`llama_stack/strong_typing/schema.py` where reflection code was updated
to deal with "newer" types.
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
Add support for the temperature to the responses API
## Test Plan
Manually tested simple case
unit tests added for simple case and tool calls
Signed-off-by: Derek Higgins <derekh@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
When the result of a ToolCall gets passed back into vLLM for the model
to handle the tool call result (as is often the case in agentic
tool-calling workflows), we forgot to handle the case where BuiltinTool
calls are not string values but instead instances of the BuiltinTool
enum. This fixes that, properly converting those enums to string values
before trying to serialize them into an OpenAI chat completion request
to vLLM.
PR #1931 fixed a bug where we weren't passing these tool calling results
back into vLLM, but as a side-effect it created this serialization bug
when using BuiltinTools.
Closes#2070
## Test Plan
I added a new unit test to the openai_compat unit tests to cover this
scenario, ensured the new test failed before this fix, and all the
existing tests there plus the new one passed with this fix.
```
python -m pytest -s -v tests/unit/providers/utils/inference/test_openai_compat.py
```
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
When running a Llama Stack server and invoking the
`/v1/safety/run-shield` endpoint, the NVIDIA Guardrails endpoint in some
cases errors with a `422: Unprocessable Entity` due to malformed input.
For example, given an request body like:
```
{
"model": "test",
"messages": [
{ "role": "user", "content": "You are stupid." }
]
}
```
`convert_pydantic_to_json_value` converts the message to:
```
{ "role": "user", "content": "You are stupid.", "context": null }
```
Which causes NVIDIA Guardrails to return an error `HTTPError: 422 Client
Error: Unprocessable Entity for url:
http://nemo.test/v1/guardrail/checks`, because `context` shouldn't be
included in the body.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
I ran the Llama Stack server locally and manually verified that the
endpoint now succeeds.
```
message = {"role": "user", "content": "You are stupid."}
response = client.safety.run_shield(messages=[message], shield_id=shield_id, params={})
```
Server logs:
```
14:29:09.656 [START] /v1/safety/run-shield
INFO: 127.0.0.1:54616 - "POST /v1/safety/run-shield HTTP/1.1" 200 OK
14:29:09.918 [END] /v1/safety/run-shield [StatusCode.OK] (262.26ms
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Co-authored-by: Jash Gulabrai <jgulabrai@nvidia.com>
# What does this PR do?
Implemetation of NeMO Datastore register, unregister API.
Open Issues:
- provider_id gets set to `localfs` in client.datasets.register() as it
is specified in routing_tables.py: DatasetsRoutingTable
see: #1860
Currently I have passed `"provider_id":"nvidia"` in metadata and have
parsed that in `DatasetsRoutingTable`
(Not the best approach, but just a quick workaround to make it work for
now.)
## Test Plan
- Unit test cases: `pytest
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_datastore.py`
```bash
========================================================== test session starts ===========================================================
platform linux -- Python 3.10.0, pytest-8.3.5, pluggy-1.5.0
rootdir: /home/ubuntu/llama-stack
configfile: pyproject.toml
plugins: anyio-4.9.0, asyncio-0.26.0, nbval-0.11.0, metadata-3.1.1, html-4.1.1, cov-6.1.0
asyncio: mode=strict, asyncio_default_fixture_loop_scope=None, asyncio_default_test_loop_scope=function
collected 2 items
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_datastore.py .. [100%]
============================================================ warnings summary ============================================================
====================================================== 2 passed, 1 warning in 0.84s ======================================================
```
cc: @dglogo, @mattf, @yanxi0830
# What does this PR do?
This addresses 2 bugs I ran into when launching a fine-tuning job with
the NVIDIA Adapter:
1. Session handling in `_make_request` helper function returns an error.
```
INFO: 127.0.0.1:55831 - "POST /v1/post-training/supervised-fine-tune HTTP/1.1" 500 Internal Server Error
16:11:45.643 [END] /v1/post-training/supervised-fine-tune [StatusCode.OK] (270.44ms)
16:11:45.643 [ERROR] Error executing endpoint route='/v1/post-training/supervised-fine-tune' method='post'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/jgulabrai/Projects/forks/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py", line 201, in endpoint
return await maybe_await(value)
File "/Users/jgulabrai/Projects/forks/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py", line 161, in maybe_await
return await value
File "/Users/jgulabrai/Projects/forks/llama-stack/llama_stack/providers/remote/post_training/nvidia/post_training.py", line 408, in supervised_fine_tune
response = await self._make_request(
File "/Users/jgulabrai/Projects/forks/llama-stack/llama_stack/providers/remote/post_training/nvidia/post_training.py", line 98, in _make_request
async with self.session.request(method, url, params=params, json=json, **kwargs) as response:
File "/Users/jgulabrai/Projects/forks/llama-stack/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/aiohttp/client.py", line 1425, in __aenter__
self._resp: _RetType = await self._coro
File "/Users/jgulabrai/Projects/forks/llama-stack/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/aiohttp/client.py", line 579, in _request
handle = tm.start()
File "/Users/jgulabrai/Projects/forks/llama-stack/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/aiohttp/helpers.py", line 587, in start
return self._loop.call_at(when, self.__call__)
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.10/lib/python3.10/asyncio/base_events.py", line 724, in call_at
self._check_closed()
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.10/lib/python3.10/asyncio/base_events.py", line 510, in _check_closed
raise RuntimeError('Event loop is closed')
RuntimeError: Event loop is closed
```
Note: This only occurred when initializing the client like so:
```
client = LlamaStackClient(
base_url="http://0.0.0.0:8321"
)
response = client.post_training.supervised_fine_tune(...) # Returns error
```
I didn't run into this issue when using the library client:
```
client = LlamaStackAsLibraryClient("nvidia")
client.initialize()
response = client.post_training.supervised_fine_tune(...) # Works fine
```
2. The `algorithm_config` param in `supervised_fine_tune` is parsed as a
`dict` when run from unit tests, but a Pydantic model when invoked using
the Llama Stack client. So, the call fails outside of unit tests:
```
INFO: 127.0.0.1:54024 - "POST /v1/post-training/supervised-fine-tune HTTP/1.1" 500 Internal Server Error
21:14:02.315 [END] /v1/post-training/supervised-fine-tune [StatusCode.OK] (71.18ms)
21:14:02.314 [ERROR] Error executing endpoint route='/v1/post-training/supervised-fine-tune' method='post'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/jgulabrai/Projects/forks/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py", line 205, in endpoint
return await maybe_await(value)
File "/Users/jgulabrai/Projects/forks/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py", line 164, in maybe_await
return await value
File "/Users/jgulabrai/Projects/forks/llama-stack/llama_stack/providers/remote/post_training/nvidia/post_training.py", line 407, in supervised_fine_tune
"adapter_dim": algorithm_config.get("adapter_dim"),
File "/Users/jgulabrai/Projects/forks/llama-stack/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pydantic/main.py", line 891, in __getattr__
raise AttributeError(f'{type(self).__name__!r} object has no attribute {item!r}')
AttributeError: 'LoraFinetuningConfig' object has no attribute 'get'
```
The code assumes `algorithm_config` should be `dict`, so I just handle
both cases.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
1. I ran a local Llama Stack server with the necessary env vars:
```
lama stack run llama_stack/templates/nvidia/run.yaml --port 8321 --env ...
```
And invoked `supervised_fine_tune` to confirm neither of the errors
above occur.
```
client = LlamaStackClient(
base_url="http://0.0.0.0:8321"
)
response = client.post_training.supervised_fine_tune(...)
```
2. I confirmed the unit tests still pass: `./scripts/unit-tests.sh
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_supervised_fine_tuning.py`
[//]: # (## Documentation)
---------
Co-authored-by: Jash Gulabrai <jgulabrai@nvidia.com>
# What does this PR do?
Adds custom model registration functionality to NVIDIAInferenceAdapter
which let's the inference happen on:
- post-training model
- non-llama models in API Catalogue(behind
https://integrate.api.nvidia.com and endpoints compatible with
AyncOpenAI)
## Example Usage:
```python
from llama_stack.apis.models import Model, ModelType
from llama_stack.distribution.library_client import LlamaStackAsLibraryClient
client = LlamaStackAsLibraryClient("nvidia")
_ = client.initialize()
client.models.register(
model_id=model_name,
model_type=ModelType.llm,
provider_id="nvidia"
)
response = client.inference.chat_completion(
model_id=model_name,
messages=[{"role":"system","content":"You are a helpful assistant."},{"role":"user","content":"Write a limerick about the wonders of GPU computing."}],
)
```
## Test Plan
```bash
pytest tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_supervised_fine_tuning.py
========================================================== test session starts ===========================================================
platform linux -- Python 3.10.0, pytest-8.3.5, pluggy-1.5.0
rootdir: /home/ubuntu/llama-stack
configfile: pyproject.toml
plugins: anyio-4.9.0
collected 6 items
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_supervised_fine_tuning.py ...... [100%]
============================================================ warnings summary ============================================================
../miniconda/envs/nvidia-1/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pydantic/fields.py:1076
/home/ubuntu/miniconda/envs/nvidia-1/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pydantic/fields.py:1076: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Using extra keyword arguments on `Field` is deprecated and will be removed. Use `json_schema_extra` instead. (Extra keys: 'contentEncoding'). Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.11/migration/
warn(
-- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/capture-warnings.html
====================================================== 6 passed, 1 warning in 1.51s ======================================================
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Updated Readme.md
cc: @dglogo, @sumitb, @mattf
# What does this PR do?
This PR adds support for NVIDIA's NeMo Evaluator API to the Llama Stack
eval module. The integration enables users to evaluate models via the
Llama Stack interface.
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
1. Added unit tests and successfully ran from root of project:
`./scripts/unit-tests.sh tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_eval.py`
```
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_eval.py::TestNVIDIAEvalImpl::test_job_cancel PASSED
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_eval.py::TestNVIDIAEvalImpl::test_job_result PASSED
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_eval.py::TestNVIDIAEvalImpl::test_job_status PASSED
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_eval.py::TestNVIDIAEvalImpl::test_register_benchmark PASSED
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_eval.py::TestNVIDIAEvalImpl::test_run_eval PASSED
```
2. Verified I could build the Llama Stack image: `LLAMA_STACK_DIR=$(pwd)
llama stack build --template nvidia --image-type venv`
Documentation added to
`llama_stack/providers/remote/eval/nvidia/README.md`
---------
Co-authored-by: Jash Gulabrai <jgulabrai@nvidia.com>
Include the tool call details with the chat when doing Rag with Remote
vllm
Fixes: #1929
With this PR the tool call is included in the chat returned to vllm, the
model (meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct) the returns the answer as
expected.
Signed-off-by: Derek Higgins <derekh@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This PR handles the case where a Customization Job's status is
`unknown`. Since we don't map `unknown` to a valid `JobStatus`, the
PostTraining provider throws an exception when fetching/listing a job.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
`./scripts/unit-tests.sh
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_supervised_fine_tuning.py` succeeds
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Co-authored-by: Jash Gulabrai <jgulabrai@nvidia.com>
Fixes: #1955
Since 0.2.0, the vLLM gets an empty list (vs ``None``in 0.1.9 and
before) when there are no tools configured which causes the issue
described in #1955 p. This patch avoids sending the 'tools' param to the
vLLM altogether instead of an empty list.
It also adds a small unit test to avoid regressions.
The OpenAI
[specification](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create)
does not explicitly state that the list cannot be empty but I found this
out through experimentation and it might depend on the actual remote
vllm. In any case, as this parameter is Optional, is best to skip it
altogether if there's no tools configured.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Alvarez <dalvarez@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
Now a separate thread is started to execute training jobs. Training
requests now return job ID before the job completes. (Which fixes API
timeouts for any jobs that take longer than a minute.)
Note: the scheduler code is meant to be spun out in the future into a
common provider service that can be reused for different APIs and
providers. It is also expected to back the /jobs API proposed here:
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/discussions/1238
Hence its somewhat generalized form which is expected to simplify its
adoption elsewhere in the future.
Note: this patch doesn't attempt to implement missing APIs (e.g. cancel
or job removal). This work will belong to follow-up PRs.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
Added unit tests for the scheduler module. For the API coverage, did
manual testing and was able to run a training cycle on GPU. The initial
call returned job ID before the training completed, as (now) expected.
Artifacts are returned as expected.
```
JobArtifactsResponse(checkpoints=[{'identifier': 'meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-sft-0', 'created_at': '2025-03-07T22:45:19.892714', 'epoch': 0, 'post_training_job_id': 'test-job2ee77104-2fd3-4a4e-84cf-f83f8b8f1f50', 'path': '/home/ec2-user/.llama/checkpoints/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-sft-0', 'training_metrics': None}], job_uuid='test-job2ee77104-2fd3-4a4e-84cf-f83f8b8f1f50')
```
The integration test is currently disabled for the provider. I will look
into how it can be enabled in a different PR / issue context.
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
This PR adds unit tests for the NVIDIA Safety provider implementation.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
1. Ran `./scripts/unit-tests.sh
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_safety.py` from the root of the
project. Verified tests pass.
```
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_safety.py::TestNVIDIASafetyAdapter::test_init_nemo_guardrails Initializing NVIDIASafetyAdapter(http://nemo.test)...
PASSED
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_safety.py::TestNVIDIASafetyAdapter::test_init_nemo_guardrails_invalid_temperature Initializing NVIDIASafetyAdapter(http://nemo.test)...
PASSED
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_safety.py::TestNVIDIASafetyAdapter::test_register_shield_with_valid_id Initializing NVIDIASafetyAdapter(http://nemo.test)...
PASSED
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_safety.py::TestNVIDIASafetyAdapter::test_register_shield_without_id Initializing NVIDIASafetyAdapter(http://nemo.test)...
PASSED
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_safety.py::TestNVIDIASafetyAdapter::test_run_shield_allowed Initializing NVIDIASafetyAdapter(http://nemo.test)...
PASSED
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_safety.py::TestNVIDIASafetyAdapter::test_run_shield_blocked Initializing NVIDIASafetyAdapter(http://nemo.test)...
PASSED
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_safety.py::TestNVIDIASafetyAdapter::test_run_shield_http_error Initializing NVIDIASafetyAdapter(http://nemo.test)...
PASSED
tests/unit/providers/nvidia/test_safety.py::TestNVIDIASafetyAdapter::test_run_shield_not_found Initializing NVIDIASafetyAdapter(http://nemo.test)...
PASSED
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
---------
Co-authored-by: Jash Gulabrai <jgulabrai@nvidia.com>
# What does this PR do?
Re-enable isort enforcement.
It was disabled in 1a73f8305b, probably by
mistake.
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
This is to stay consistent with other APIs.
This change registers files in API, even though there are still no
providers. Removing tests that require a provider existing for a merged
API to enable it in API layer.
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
This PR adds support for NVIDIA's NeMo Customizer API to the Llama Stack
post-training module. The integration enables users to fine-tune models
using NVIDIA's cloud-based customization service through a consistent
Llama Stack interface.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
Yet to be done
Things pending under this PR:
- [x] Integration of fine-tuned model(new checkpoint) for inference with
nvidia llm distribution
- [x] distribution integration of API
- [x] Add test cases for customizer(In Progress)
- [x] Documentation
```
LLAMA_STACK_BASE_URL=http://localhost:5002 pytest -v tests/client-sdk/post_training/test_supervised_fine_tuning.py
============================================================================================================================================================================ test session starts =============================================================================================================================================================================
platform linux -- Python 3.10.0, pytest-8.3.4, pluggy-1.5.0 -- /home/ubuntu/llama-stack/.venv/bin/python
cachedir: .pytest_cache
metadata: {'Python': '3.10.0', 'Platform': 'Linux-6.8.0-1021-gcp-x86_64-with-glibc2.35', 'Packages': {'pytest': '8.3.4', 'pluggy': '1.5.0'}, 'Plugins': {'nbval': '0.11.0', 'metadata': '3.1.1', 'anyio': '4.8.0', 'html': '4.1.1', 'asyncio': '0.25.3'}}
rootdir: /home/ubuntu/llama-stack
configfile: pyproject.toml
plugins: nbval-0.11.0, metadata-3.1.1, anyio-4.8.0, html-4.1.1, asyncio-0.25.3
asyncio: mode=strict, asyncio_default_fixture_loop_scope=None
collected 2 items
tests/client-sdk/post_training/test_supervised_fine_tuning.py::test_post_training_provider_registration[txt=8B] PASSED [ 50%]
tests/client-sdk/post_training/test_supervised_fine_tuning.py::test_list_training_jobs[txt=8B] PASSED [100%]
======================================================================================================================================================================== 2 passed, 1 warning in 0.10s ========================================================================================================================================================================
```
cc: @mattf @dglogo @sumitb
---------
Co-authored-by: Ubuntu <ubuntu@llama-stack-customizer-dev-inst-2tx95fyisatvlic4we8hidx5tfj.us-central1-a.c.brevdevprod.internal>
# What does this PR do?
This PR updates the sqlite-vec database calls to be non-blocking. Note
that each operation creates a new connection, which incurs some
performance overhead but is reasonable given [SQLite's threading and
connections constraints](https://www.sqlite.org/threadsafe.html).
Summary of changes:
- Refactored `SQLiteVecIndex` class to store database path instead of
connection object
- Added `_create_sqlite_connection()` helper function to create
connections on demand
- Ensured proper connection closure in all database operations
- Fixed test fixtures to use a file-based SQLite database for
thread-safety
- Updated the `SQLiteVecVectorIOAdapter` class to handle per-operation
connections
This PR helps chip away at
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/1489
## Test Plan
sqlite-vec unit tests passed locally as well as a test script using the
client as a library.
## Misc
FYI @varshaprasad96 @kevincogan
Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Arceo <farceo@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
DocVQA asks model to look a a picture, then answer a question given in
text, with a text answer by text information in the picture. these
questions often require understanding of relative positions of texts
within the picture.
original dataset is defined in the "Task1" of
https://www.docvqa.org/datasets
## Test Plan
setup llama server with
```
llama stack run ./llama_stack/templates/open-benchmark/run.yaml
```
then send traffic:
```
llama-stack-client eval run-benchmark "meta-reference-docvqa" --model-id meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct --output-dir /tmp/gpqa --num-examples 200
```
# What does this PR do?
Removed local execution option from the remote Qdrant provider and
introduced an explicit inline provider for the embedded execution.
Updated the ollama template to include this option: this part can be
reverted in case we don't want to have two default `vector_io`
providers.
(Closes#1082)
## Test Plan
Build and run an ollama distro:
```bash
llama stack build --template ollama --image-type conda
llama stack run --image-type conda ollama
```
Run one of the sample ingestionapplicatinos like
[rag_with_vector_db.py](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-apps/blob/main/examples/agents/rag_with_vector_db.py),
but replace this line:
```py
selected_vector_provider = vector_providers[0]
```
with the following, to use the `qdrant` provider:
```py
selected_vector_provider = vector_providers[1]
```
After running the test code, verify the timestamp of the Qdrant store:
```bash
% ls -ltr ~/.llama/distributions/ollama/qdrant.db/collection/test_vector_db_*
total 784
-rw-r--r--@ 1 dmartino staff 401408 Feb 26 10:07 storage.sqlite
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
---------
Signed-off-by: Daniele Martinoli <dmartino@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Arceo <farceo@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This avoids flaky timeout issue observed in CI builds, e.g.
3891286596
## Test Plan
Ran multiple times and pass consistently.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
This switches from an OpenAI client to the AsyncOpenAI client in the
remote vllm provider. The main benefit of this is that instead of each
client call being a blocking operation that was blocking our server
event loop, the client calls are now async operations that do not block
the event loop.
The actual fix is quite simple and straightforward. Creating a reliable
reproducer of this with a unit test that verifies we were blocking the
event loop before and are not blocking it any longer was a bit harder.
Some other inference providers have this same issue, so we may want to
make that simple delayed http server a bit more generic and pull it into
a common place as other inference providers get fixed.
(Closes#1457)
## Test Plan
I verified the unit tests and test_text_inference tests pass with this
change like below:
```
python -m pytest -v tests/unit
```
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" \
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=remote-vllm \
python -m pytest -v -s \
tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct"
```
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This gracefully handles the case where the vLLM server responded to a
completion request with no choices, which can happen in certain vLLM
error situations. Previously, we'd error out with a stack trace about a
list index out of range. Now, we just log a warning to the user and move
past any chunks with an empty choices list.
A specific example of the type of stack trace this fixes:
```
File "/app/llama-stack-source/llama_stack/providers/remote/inference/vllm/vllm.py", line 170, in _process_vllm_chat_completion_stream_response
choice = chunk.choices[0]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^
IndexError: list index out of range
```
Now, instead of erroring out with that stack trace, we log a warning
that vLLM failed to generate any completions and alert the user to check
the vLLM server logs for details.
This is related to #1277 and addresses the stack trace shown in that
issue, although does not in and of itself change the functional behavior
of vLLM tool calling.
## Test Plan
As part of this fix, I added new unit tests to trigger this same error
and verify it no longer happens. That is
`test_process_vllm_chat_completion_stream_response_no_choices` in the
new `tests/unit/providers/inference/test_remote_vllm.py`. I also added a
couple of more tests to trigger and verify the last couple of remote
vllm provider bug fixes - specifically a test for #1236 (builtin tool
calling) and #1325 (vLLM <= v0.6.3).
This required fixing the signature of
`_process_vllm_chat_completion_stream_response` to accept the actual
type of chunks it was getting passed - specifically changing from our
openai_compat `OpenAICompatCompletionResponse` to
`openai.types.chat.chat_completion_chunk.ChatCompletionChunk`. It was
not actually getting passed `OpenAICompatCompletionResponse` objects
before, and was using attributes that didn't exist on those objects. So,
the signature now matches the type of object it's actually passed.
Run these new unit tests like this:
```
pytest tests/unit/providers/inference/test_remote_vllm.py
```
Additionally, I ensured the existing `test_text_inference.py` tests
passed via:
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" \
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=remote-vllm \
python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--inference-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
--vision-inference-model ""
```
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
