# What does this PR do?
Removed local execution option from the remote Qdrant provider and
introduced an explicit inline provider for the embedded execution.
Updated the ollama template to include this option: this part can be
reverted in case we don't want to have two default `vector_io`
providers.
(Closes#1082)
## Test Plan
Build and run an ollama distro:
```bash
llama stack build --template ollama --image-type conda
llama stack run --image-type conda ollama
```
Run one of the sample ingestionapplicatinos like
[rag_with_vector_db.py](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-apps/blob/main/examples/agents/rag_with_vector_db.py),
but replace this line:
```py
selected_vector_provider = vector_providers[0]
```
with the following, to use the `qdrant` provider:
```py
selected_vector_provider = vector_providers[1]
```
After running the test code, verify the timestamp of the Qdrant store:
```bash
% ls -ltr ~/.llama/distributions/ollama/qdrant.db/collection/test_vector_db_*
total 784
-rw-r--r--@ 1 dmartino staff 401408 Feb 26 10:07 storage.sqlite
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
---------
Signed-off-by: Daniele Martinoli <dmartino@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Arceo <farceo@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
See https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1171 which is the
original PR. Author: @zc277584121
feat: add [Milvus](https://milvus.io/) vectorDB
note: I use the MilvusClient to implement it instead of
AsyncMilvusClient, because when I tested AsyncMilvusClient, it would
raise issues about evenloop, which I think AsyncMilvusClient SDK is not
robust enough to be compatible with llama_stack framework.
## Test Plan
have passed the unit test and ene2end test
Here is my end2end test logs, including the client code, client log,
server logs from inline and remote settings
[test_end2end_logs.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/18964391/test_end2end_logs.zip)
---------
Signed-off-by: ChengZi <chen.zhang@zilliz.com>
Co-authored-by: Cheney Zhang <chen.zhang@zilliz.com>
