This adds a `--typescript-only` flag to `scripts/integration-tests.sh`
that skips pytest execution entirely while still starting the Llama
Stack server (required for TS client tests). The TypeScript client can
now be tested independently without Python test dependencies.
The `allowed_models` configuration was only being applied when listing
models via the `/v1/models` endpoint, but the actual inference requests
weren't checking this restriction. This meant users could directly
request any model the provider supports by specifying it in their
inference call, completely bypassing the intended cost controls.
The fix adds validation to all three inference methods (chat
completions, completions, and embeddings) that checks the requested
model against the allowed_models list before making the provider API
call.
### Test plan
Added unit tests
Calls to custom span capture tooling is replaced with calls to the open
telemetry library 1:1. No additional modifications were made, and
formatting changes can be addressed in follow up PRs.
This change created a standardized way to handle telemetry internally.
All custom names that are not a semantic convention are maintained in
constants.py. Helper functions to capture custom telemetry data not
captured by automatic instrumentation are in helpers.py.
# What does this PR do?
<!-- Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to
relevant issues if applicable. -->
Addresses feedback from
https://github.com/llamastack/llama-stack/pull/4187#discussion_r2542797437
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
# What does this PR do?
<!-- Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to
relevant issues if applicable. -->
This PR is responsible for providing actual implementation of OpenAI
compatible prompts in Responses API. This is the follow up PR with
actual implementation after introducing #3942
The need of this functionality was initiated in #3514.
> Note, https://github.com/llamastack/llama-stack/pull/3514 is divided
on three separate PRs. Current PR is the third of three.
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
Closes#3321
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
Manual testing, CI workflow with added unit tests
Comprehensive manual testing with new implementation:
**Test Prompts with Images with text on them in Responses API:**
I used this image for testing purposes: [iphone 17
image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9e2ee821-e394-4bbd-b1c8-d48a3fa315de)
1. Upload an image:
```
curl -X POST http://localhost:8321/v1/files \
-H "Content-Type: multipart/form-data" \
-F "file=@/Users/ianmiller/iphone.jpeg" \
-F "purpose=assistants"
```
`{"object":"file","id":"file-d6d375f238e14f21952cc40246bc8504","bytes":556241,"created_at":1761750049,"expires_at":1793286049,"filename":"iphone.jpeg","purpose":"assistants"}%`
2. Create prompt:
```
curl -X POST http://localhost:8321/v1/prompts \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"prompt": "You are a product analysis expert. Analyze the following product:\n\nProduct Name: {{product_name}}\nDescription: {{description}}\n\nImage: {{product_photo}}\n\nProvide a detailed analysis including quality assessment, target audience, and pricing recommendations.",
"variables": ["product_name", "description", "product_photo"]
}'
```
`{"prompt":"You are a product analysis expert. Analyze the following
product:\n\nProduct Name: {{product_name}}\nDescription:
{{description}}\n\nImage: {{product_photo}}\n\nProvide a detailed
analysis including quality assessment, target audience, and pricing
recommendations.","version":1,"prompt_id":"pmpt_7be2208cb82cdbc35356354dae1f335d1e9b7baeca21ea62","variables":["product_name","description","product_photo"],"is_default":false}%`
3. Create response:
```
curl -X POST http://localhost:8321/v1/responses \
-H "Accept: application/json, text/event-stream" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"input": "Please analyze this product",
"model": "openai/gpt-4o",
"store": true,
"prompt": {
"id": "pmpt_7be2208cb82cdbc35356354dae1f335d1e9b7baeca21ea62",
"version": "1",
"variables": {
"product_name": {
"type": "input_text",
"text": "iPhone 17 Pro Max"
},
"product_photo": {
"type": "input_image",
"file_id": "file-d6d375f238e14f21952cc40246bc8504",
"detail": "high"
}
}
}
}'
```
`{"created_at":1761750427,"error":null,"id":"resp_f897f914-e3b8-4783-8223-3ed0d32fcbc6","model":"openai/gpt-4o","object":"response","output":[{"content":[{"text":"###
Product Analysis: iPhone 17 Pro Max\n\n**Quality Assessment:**\n\n-
**Display & Design:**\n - The 6.9-inch display is large, ideal for
streaming and productivity.\n - Anti-reflective technology and 120Hz
refresh rate enhance viewing experience, providing smoother visuals and
reducing glare.\n - Titanium frame suggests a premium build, offering
durability and a sleek appearance.\n\n- **Performance:**\n - The Apple
A19 Pro chip promises significant performance improvements, likely
leading to faster processing and efficient multitasking.\n - 12GB RAM is
substantial for a smartphone, ensuring smooth operation for demanding
apps and games.\n\n- **Camera System:**\n - The triple 48MP camera setup
(wide, ultra-wide, telephoto) is designed for versatile photography
needs, capturing high-resolution photos and videos.\n - The 24MP front
camera will appeal to selfie enthusiasts and content creators needing
quality front-facing shots.\n\n- **Connectivity:**\n - Wi-Fi 7 support
indicates future-proof wireless capabilities, providing faster and more
reliable internet connectivity.\n\n**Target Audience:**\n\n- **Tech
Enthusiasts:** Individuals interested in cutting-edge technology and
performance.\n- **Content Creators:** Users who need a robust camera
system for photo and video production.\n- **Luxury Consumers:** Those
who prefer premium materials and top-of-the-line specs.\n-
**Professionals:** Users who require efficient multitasking and
productivity features.\n\n**Pricing Recommendations:**\n\n- Given the
premium specifications, a higher price point is expected. Consider
pricing competitively within the high-end smartphone market while
justifying cost through unique features like the titanium frame and
advanced connectivity options.\n- Positioning around the $1,200 to
$1,500 range would align with expectations for top-tier devices,
catering to its target audience while ensuring
profitability.\n\nOverall, the iPhone 17 Pro Max showcases a blend of
innovative features and premium design, aimed at users seeking high
performance and superior
aesthetics.","type":"output_text","annotations":[]}],"role":"assistant","type":"message","id":"msg_66f4d844-4d9e-4102-80fc-eb75b34b6dbd","status":"completed"}],"parallel_tool_calls":false,"previous_response_id":null,"prompt":{"id":"pmpt_7be2208cb82cdbc35356354dae1f335d1e9b7baeca21ea62","variables":{"product_name":{"text":"iPhone
17 Pro
Max","type":"input_text"},"product_photo":{"detail":"high","type":"input_image","file_id":"file-d6d375f238e14f21952cc40246bc8504","image_url":null}},"version":"1"},"status":"completed","temperature":null,"text":{"format":{"type":"text"}},"top_p":null,"tools":[],"truncation":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":830,"output_tokens":394,"total_tokens":1224,"input_tokens_details":{"cached_tokens":0},"output_tokens_details":{"reasoning_tokens":0}},"instructions":null}%`
**Test Prompts with PDF files in Responses API:**
I used this PDF file for testing purposes:
[invoicesample.pdf](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/22958943/invoicesample.pdf)
1. Upload PDF:
```
curl -X POST http://localhost:8321/v1/files \
-H "Content-Type: multipart/form-data" \
-F "file=@/Users/ianmiller/invoicesample.pdf" \
-F "purpose=assistants"
```
`{"object":"file","id":"file-7fbb1043a4bb468cab60ffe4b8631d8e","bytes":149568,"created_at":1761750730,"expires_at":1793286730,"filename":"invoicesample.pdf","purpose":"assistants"}%`
2. Create prompt:
```
curl -X POST http://localhost:8321/v1/prompts \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"prompt": "You are an accounting and financial analysis expert. Analyze the following invoice document:\n\nInvoice Document: {{invoice_doc}}\n\nProvide a comprehensive analysis",
"variables": ["invoice_doc"]
}'
```
`{"prompt":"You are an accounting and financial analysis expert. Analyze
the following invoice document:\n\nInvoice Document:
{{invoice_doc}}\n\nProvide a comprehensive
analysis","version":1,"prompt_id":"pmpt_72e2a184a86f32a568b6afb5455dca5c16bf3cc3f80092dc","variables":["invoice_doc"],"is_default":false}%`
3. Create response:
```
curl -X POST http://localhost:8321/v1/responses \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"input": "Please provide a detailed analysis of this invoice",
"model": "openai/gpt-4o",
"store": true,
"prompt": {
"id": "pmpt_72e2a184a86f32a568b6afb5455dca5c16bf3cc3f80092dc",
"version": "1",
"variables": {
"invoice_doc": {
"type": "input_file",
"file_id": "file-7fbb1043a4bb468cab60ffe4b8631d8e",
"filename": "invoicesample.pdf"
}
}
}
}'
```
`{"created_at":1761750881,"error":null,"id":"resp_da866913-db06-4702-8000-174daed9dbbb","model":"openai/gpt-4o","object":"response","output":[{"content":[{"text":"Here's
a detailed analysis of the invoice provided:\n\n### Seller
Information\n- **Business Name:** The invoice features a logo with
\"Sunny Farm\" indicating the business identity.\n- **Address:** 123
Somewhere St, Melbourne VIC 3000\n- **Contact Information:** Phone
number (03) 1234 5678\n\n### Buyer Information\n- **Name:** Denny
Gunawan\n- **Address:** 221 Queen St, Melbourne VIC 3000\n\n###
Transaction Details\n- **Invoice Number:** #20130304\n- **Date of
Transaction:** Not explicitly mentioned, likely inferred from the
invoice number or needs clarification.\n\n### Items Purchased\n1.
**Apple**\n - Price: $5.00/kg\n - Quantity: 1 kg\n - Subtotal:
$5.00\n\n2. **Orange**\n - Price: $1.99/kg\n - Quantity: 2 kg\n -
Subtotal: $3.98\n\n3. **Watermelon**\n - Price: $1.69/kg\n - Quantity: 3
kg\n - Subtotal: $5.07\n\n4. **Mango**\n - Price: $9.56/kg\n - Quantity:
2 kg\n - Subtotal: $19.12\n\n5. **Peach**\n - Price: $2.99/kg\n -
Quantity: 1 kg\n - Subtotal: $2.99\n\n### Financial Summary\n-
**Subtotal for Items:** $36.00\n- **GST (Goods and Services Tax):** 10%
of $36.00, which amounts to $3.60\n- **Total Amount Due:** $39.60\n\n###
Notes\n- The invoice includes a placeholder text: \"Lorem ipsum dolor
sit amet...\" which is typically used as filler text. This might
indicate a section intended for terms, conditions, or additional notes
that haven’t been completed.\n\n### Visual and Design Elements\n- The
invoice uses a simple and clear layout, featuring the business logo
prominently and stating essential information such as contact and
transaction details in a structured manner.\n- There is a \"Thank You\"
note at the bottom, which adds a professional and courteous
touch.\n\n### Considerations\n- Ensure the date of the transaction is
clear if there are any future references needed.\n- Replace filler text
with relevant terms and conditions or any special instructions
pertaining to the transaction.\n\nThis invoice appears standard,
representing a small business transaction with clearly itemized products
and applicable
taxes.","type":"output_text","annotations":[]}],"role":"assistant","type":"message","id":"msg_39f3b39e-4684-4444-8e4d-e7395f88c9dc","status":"completed"}],"parallel_tool_calls":false,"previous_response_id":null,"prompt":{"id":"pmpt_72e2a184a86f32a568b6afb5455dca5c16bf3cc3f80092dc","variables":{"invoice_doc":{"type":"input_file","file_data":null,"file_id":"file-7fbb1043a4bb468cab60ffe4b8631d8e","file_url":null,"filename":"invoicesample.pdf"}},"version":"1"},"status":"completed","temperature":null,"text":{"format":{"type":"text"}},"top_p":null,"tools":[],"truncation":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":529,"output_tokens":513,"total_tokens":1042,"input_tokens_details":{"cached_tokens":0},"output_tokens_details":{"reasoning_tokens":0}},"instructions":null}%`
**Test simple text Prompt in Responses API:**
1. Create prompt:
```
curl -X POST http://localhost:8321/v1/prompts \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"prompt": "Hello {{name}}! You are working at {{company}}. Your role is {{role}} at {{company}}. Remember, {{name}}, to be {{tone}}.",
"variables": ["name", "company", "role", "tone"]
}'
```
`{"prompt":"Hello {{name}}! You are working at {{company}}. Your role is
{{role}} at {{company}}. Remember, {{name}}, to be
{{tone}}.","version":1,"prompt_id":"pmpt_f340a3164a4f65d975c774ffe38ea42d15e7ce4a835919ef","variables":["name","company","role","tone"],"is_default":false}%`
2. Create response:
```
curl -X POST http://localhost:8321/v1/responses \
-H "Accept: application/json, text/event-stream" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"input": "What is the capital of Ireland?",
"model": "openai/gpt-4o",
"store": true,
"prompt": {
"id": "pmpt_f340a3164a4f65d975c774ffe38ea42d15e7ce4a835919ef",
"version": "1",
"variables": {
"name": {
"type": "input_text",
"text": "Alice"
},
"company": {
"type": "input_text",
"text": "Dummy Company"
},
"role": {
"type": "input_text",
"text": "Geography expert"
},
"tone": {
"type": "input_text",
"text": "professional and helpful"
}
}
}
}'
```
`{"created_at":1761751097,"error":null,"id":"resp_1b037b95-d9ae-4ad0-8e76-d953897ecaef","model":"openai/gpt-4o","object":"response","output":[{"content":[{"text":"The
capital of Ireland is
Dublin.","type":"output_text","annotations":[]}],"role":"assistant","type":"message","id":"msg_8e7c72b6-2aa2-4da6-8e57-da4e12fa3ce2","status":"completed"}],"parallel_tool_calls":false,"previous_response_id":null,"prompt":{"id":"pmpt_f340a3164a4f65d975c774ffe38ea42d15e7ce4a835919ef","variables":{"name":{"text":"Alice","type":"input_text"},"company":{"text":"Dummy
Company","type":"input_text"},"role":{"text":"Geography
expert","type":"input_text"},"tone":{"text":"professional and
helpful","type":"input_text"}},"version":"1"},"status":"completed","temperature":null,"text":{"format":{"type":"text"}},"top_p":null,"tools":[],"truncation":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":47,"output_tokens":7,"total_tokens":54,"input_tokens_details":{"cached_tokens":0},"output_tokens_details":{"reasoning_tokens":0}},"instructions":null}%`
# Problem
OpenAI gpt-4 returned an error when built-in and mcp calls were skipped
due to max_tool_calls parameter. Following is from the server log:
```
RuntimeError: OpenAI response failed: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': "An assistant message with
'tool_calls' must be followed by tool messages responding to each 'tool_call_id'. The following tool_call_ids
did not have response messages: call_Yi9V1QNpN73dJCAgP2Arcjej", 'type': 'invalid_request_error', 'param':
'messages', 'code': None}}
```
# What does this PR do?
- Fixes error returned by openai/gpt when calls were skipped due to
max_tool_calls. We now return a tool message that explicitly mentions
that the call is skipped.
- Adds integration tests as a follow-up to
PR#[4062](https://github.com/llamastack/llama-stack/pull/4062)
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
Part 2 for issue
#[3563](https://github.com/llamastack/llama-stack/issues/3563)
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
- Added integration tests
- Added new recordings
---------
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
# Fix for Issue #3797
## Problem
Vector store search failed with Pydantic ValidationError when chunk
metadata contained list-type values.
**Error:**
```
ValidationError: 3 validation errors for VectorStoreSearchResponse
attributes.tags.str: Input should be a valid string
attributes.tags.float: Input should be a valid number
attributes.tags.bool: Input should be a valid boolean
```
**Root Cause:**
- `Chunk.metadata` accepts `dict[str, Any]` (any type allowed)
- `VectorStoreSearchResponse.attributes` requires `dict[str, str | float
| bool]` (primitives only)
- Direct assignment at line 641 caused validation failure for
non-primitive types
## Solution
Added utility function to filter metadata to primitive types before
creating search response.
## Impact
**Fixed:**
- Vector search works with list metadata (e.g., `tags: ["transformers",
"gpu"]`)
- Lists become searchable as comma-separated strings
- No ValidationError on search responses
**Preserved:**
- Full metadata still available in `VectorStoreContent.metadata`
- No API schema changes
- Backward compatible with existing primitive metadata
**Affected:**
All vector store providers using `OpenAIVectorStoreMixin`: FAISS,
Chroma, Qdrant, Milvus, Weaviate, PGVector, SQLite-vec
## Testing
tests/unit/providers/vector_io/test_vector_utils.py::test_sanitize_metadata_for_attributes
---------
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Arceo <arceofrancisco@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
<!-- Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to
relevant issues if applicable. -->
I believe that should avoid CI issues seen in
https://github.com/llamastack/llama-stack/pull/4173.
Error we see in Stainless logs:
```
(cannot lock ref 'refs/heads/preview/base/fix/issue-3797-metadata-validation': 'refs/heads/preview/base/fix' exists; cannot create 'refs/heads/preview/base/fix/issue-3797-metadata-validation')
```
The issue is that if a branch `fix` exists, `fix/<whatever>` cannot be
created (that's how git refs work unfortunately...). The fix in this PR
is to ensure PRs from forks are using the author as a prefix.
In addition we will do changes to the Stainless API to return better
error messages here, it should have been a 4xx with a meaningful error,
not a 500.
And we will likely need to delete the `fix` branch.
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
Integration tests can now validate the TypeScript SDK alongside Python
tests when running against server-mode stacks. Currently, this only adds
a _small_ number of tests. We should extend only if truly needed -- this
smoke check may be sufficient.
When `RUN_CLIENT_TS_TESTS=1` is set, the test script runs TypeScript
tests after Python tests pass. Tests are mapped via
`tests/integration/client-typescript/suites.json` which defines which
TypeScript test files correspond to each Python suite/setup combination.
The fact that we need exact "test_id"s (which are actually generated by
pytest) to be hardcoded inside the Typescript tests (so we hit the
recorded paths) is a big smell and it might become grating, but maybe
the benefit is worth it if we keep this test suite _small_ and targeted.
## Test Plan
Run with TypeScript tests enabled:
```bash
OPENAI_API_KEY=dummy RUN_CLIENT_TS_TESTS=1 \
scripts/integration-tests.sh --stack-config server:ci-tests --suite responses --setup gpt
```
# What does this PR do?
Change Safety API from required to optional dependency, following the
established pattern used for other optional dependencies in Llama Stack.
The provider now starts successfully without Safety API configured.
Requests that explicitly include guardrails will receive a clear error
message when Safety API is unavailable.
This enables local development and testing without Safety API while
maintaining clear error messages when guardrail features are requested.
Closes#4165
Signed-off-by: Anik Bhattacharjee <anbhatta@redhat.com>
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
1. New unit tests added in
`tests/unit/providers/agents/meta_reference/test_safety_optional.py`
2. Integration tests performed with the files in
https://gist.github.com/anik120/c33cef497ec7085e1fe2164e0705b8d6
(i) test with `test_integration_no_safety_fail.yaml`:
Config WITHOUT Safety API, should fail with helpful error since
`required_safety_api` is `true` by default
```
$ uv run llama stack run test_integration_no_safety_fail.yaml 2>&1 | grep -B 5 -A 15 "ValueError.*Safety\|Safety API is
required"
File "/Users/anbhatta/go/src/github.com/llamastack/llama-stack/src/llama_stack/providers/inline/agents/meta_reference
/__init__.py", line 27, in get_provider_impl
raise ValueError(
...<9 lines>...
)
ValueError: Safety API is required but not configured.
To run without safety checks, explicitly set in your configuration:
providers:
agents:
- provider_id: meta-reference
provider_type: inline::meta-reference
config:
require_safety_api: false
Warning: This disables all safety guardrails for this agents provider.
```
(ii) test with `test_integration_no_safety_works.yaml`
Config WITHOUT Safety API, **but** `require_safety_api=false` is
explicitly set, should succeed
```
$ uv run llama stack run test_integration_no_safety_works.yaml
INFO 2025-11-16 09:49:10,044 llama_stack.cli.stack.run:169 cli: Using run configuration:
/Users/anbhatta/go/src/github.com/llamastack/llama-stack/test_integration_no_safety_works.yaml
INFO 2025-11-16 09:49:10,052 llama_stack.cli.stack.run:228 cli: HTTPS enabled with certificates:
Key: None
Cert: None
.
.
.
INFO 2025-11-16 09:49:38,528 llama_stack.core.stack:495 core: starting registry refresh task
INFO 2025-11-16 09:49:38,534 uvicorn.error:62 uncategorized: Application startup complete.
INFO 2025-11-16 09:49:38,535 uvicorn.error:216 uncategorized: Uvicorn running on http://0.0.0.0:8321 (Press CTRL+C
```
Signed-off-by: Anik Bhattacharjee <anbhatta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anik Bhattacharjee <anbhatta@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
Completes #3732 by removing runtime URL transformations and requiring
users to provide full URLs in configuration. All providers now use
'base_url' consistently and respect the exact URL provided without
appending paths like /v1 or /openai/v1 at runtime.
BREAKING CHANGE: Users must update configs to include full URL paths
(e.g., http://localhost:11434/v1 instead of http://localhost:11434).
Closes#3732
## Test Plan
Existing tests should pass even with the URL changes, due to default
URLs being altered.
Add unit test to enforce URL standardization across remote inference
providers (verifies all use 'base_url' field with HttpUrl | None type)
Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
since `StackRunConfig` requires certain parts of `StorageConfig`, it'd
probably make sense to template in some defaults that will "just work"
for most usecases
specifically introduce`ServerStoresConfig` defaults for inference,
metadata, conversations and prompts. We already actually funnel in
defaults for these sections ad-hoc throughout the codebase
additionally set some `backends` defaults for the `StorageConfig`.
This will alleviate some weirdness for `--providers` for run/list-deps
and also some work I have to better align our list-deps/run datatypes
---------
Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com>
These primitives (used both by the Stack as well as provider
implementations) can be thought of fruitfully as internal-only APIs
which can themselves have multiple implementations. We use the new
`llama_stack_api.internal` namespace for this.
In addition: the change moves kv/sql store impls, configs, and
dependency helpers under `core/storage`
## Testing
`pytest tests/unit/utils/test_authorized_sqlstore.py`, other existing CI
# What does this PR do?
Initial PR against #4123
Adds `parallel_tool_calls` spec to Responses API and basic initial
implementation where no more than one function call is generated when
set to `False`.
## Test Plan
* Unit tests have been added to verify no more than one function call is
generated.
* A followup PR will verify passing through `parallel_tool_calls` to
providers.
* A followup PR will address verification and/or implementation of
incremental function calling across multiple conversational turns.
---------
Signed-off-by: Anastas Stoyanovsky <astoyano@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
since llama_stack_api is meant to be _just_ the API definitions of LLS,
we should have pre-commit check that prohibits anyone from accidentally
importing `from llama_stack` or adding `llama_stack` as a dependency
into `llama_stack_api`s pyproject.
## Test Plan
pre-commit should pass.
Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com>
Generate the Stainless client config directly from code so we can
validate the config before we ever write the YAML.
This change enforces allowed HTTP verbs/paths, detects duplicate routes
across resources, and ensures README example endpoints exist and match
the OpenAPI spec. The generator now fails fast when config entries
drift, keeping the published config (hopefully) more current with the
spec. I think more validation can be done but this is a good start.
# What does this PR do?
This PR improves type hint cleanup in auto-generated provider
documentation by adding regex logic.
**Issues Fixed:**
- Type hints with missing closing brackets (e.g., `list[str` instead of
`list[str]`)
- Types showing as `<class 'bool'>`, `<class 'str'>` instead of `bool`,
`str`
- The multi-line YAML frontmatter in index documentation files wasn't
ideal, so we now add the proper `|` character.
**Changes:**
1. Replaced string replacement (`.replace`) with regex-based type
cleaning to preserve the trailing bracket in case of `list` and `dict`.
2. Adds the `|` character for multi-line YAML descriptions.
3. I have regenerated the docs. However, let me know if that's not
needed.
## Test Plan
1. Ran uv run python scripts/provider_codegen.py - successfully
regenerated all docs
2. We can see that the updated docs handle correctly type hint cleanup
and multi-line yaml descriptions have now the `|` character.
### Note to the reviewer(s)
This is my first contribution to your lovely repo! Initially I was going
thourgh docs (wanted to use `remote::gemini` as provider) and realized
the issue. I've read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/llamastack/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
and decided to open the PR. Let me know if there's anything I did wrong
and I'll update my PR!
---------
Signed-off-by: thepetk <thepetk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
- Remove backward compatibility for authorization in mcp_headers
- Enforce authorization must use dedicated parameter
- Add validation error if Authorization found in provider_data headers
- Update test_mcp.py to use authorization parameter
- Update test_mcp_json_schema.py to use authorization parameter
- Update test_tools_with_schemas.py to use authorization parameter
- Update documentation to show the change in the authorization approach
Breaking Change:
- Authorization can no longer be passed via mcp_headers in provider_data
- Users must use the dedicated 'authorization' parameter instead
- Clear error message guides users to the new approach"
## Test Plan
CI
---------
Co-authored-by: Omar Abdelwahab <omara@fb.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
FastAPI generator now only unwraps body params explicitly marked with
Body(embed=False) so the /eval run_eval schema once again exposes
RunEvalRequest, matching our integration tests and the server's request
parsing.
Regenerated the OpenAPI specs to capture the restored wrapper.
CI on the Stainless preview builds should be green.
# What does this PR do?
<!-- Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to
relevant issues if applicable. -->
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
