# What does this PR do?
Resolves#4102
1. Added `web_search_2025_08_26` to the `WebSearchToolTypes` list and
the `OpenAIResponseInputToolWebSearch.type` Literal union
2. No changes needed to tool execution logic - all `web_search` types
map to the same underlying tool
3. Backward compatibility is maintained - existing `web_search`,
`web_search_preview`, and `web_search_preview_2025_03_11` types continue
to work
4. Added an integration test case using {"type":
"web_search_2025_08_26"} to verify it works correctly
5. Updated `docs/docs/providers/openai_responses_limitations.mdx` to
reflect that `web_search_2025_08_26` is now supported.
6. Removed incorrect references to `MOD1/MOD2/MOD3` (which don't exist
in the codebase)
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
---------
Signed-off-by: Aakanksha Duggal <aduggal@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
The llama-stack-client now uses /`v1/openai/v1/models` which returns
OpenAI-compatible model objects with 'id' and 'custom_metadata' fields
instead of the Resource-style 'identifier' field. Updated api_recorder
to handle the new endpoint and modified tests to access model metadata
appropriately. Deleted stale model recordings for re-recording.
**NOTE: CI will be red on this one since it is dependent on
https://github.com/llamastack/llama-stack-client-python/pull/291/files
landing. I verified locally that it is green.**
# Problem
The current inline provider appends the user provided instructions to
messages as a system prompt, but the returned response object does not
contain the instructions field (as specified in the OpenAI responses
spec).
# What does this PR do?
This pull request adds the instruction field to the response object
definition and updates the inline provider. It also ensures that
instructions from previous response is not carried over to the next
response (as specified in the openAI spec).
Closes #[3566](https://github.com/llamastack/llama-stack/issues/3566)
## Test Plan
- Tested manually for change in model response w.r.t supplied
instructions field.
- Added unit test to check that the instructions from previous response
is not carried over to the next response.
- Added integration tests to check instructions parameter in the
returned response object.
- Added new recordings for the integration tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
