|
Some checks failed
Pre-commit / pre-commit (push) Failing after 2s
SqlStore Integration Tests / test-postgres (3.12) (push) Failing after 1s
SqlStore Integration Tests / test-postgres (3.13) (push) Failing after 0s
Integration Auth Tests / test-matrix (oauth2_token) (push) Failing after 1s
Integration Tests (Replay) / generate-matrix (push) Successful in 3s
Vector IO Integration Tests / test-matrix (push) Failing after 4s
Test Llama Stack Build / generate-matrix (push) Successful in 3s
Test External Providers Installed via Module / test-external-providers-from-module (venv) (push) Has been skipped
Test Llama Stack Build / build-single-provider (push) Failing after 5s
Test Llama Stack Build / build-ubi9-container-distribution (push) Failing after 3s
Test Llama Stack Build / build-custom-container-distribution (push) Failing after 4s
Python Package Build Test / build (3.12) (push) Failing after 2s
Python Package Build Test / build (3.13) (push) Failing after 1s
Test llama stack list-deps / generate-matrix (push) Successful in 4s
Test llama stack list-deps / show-single-provider (push) Failing after 4s
API Conformance Tests / check-schema-compatibility (push) Successful in 11s
Test llama stack list-deps / list-deps-from-config (push) Failing after 4s
Test External API and Providers / test-external (venv) (push) Failing after 4s
Unit Tests / unit-tests (3.12) (push) Failing after 4s
Test Llama Stack Build / build (push) Failing after 3s
Unit Tests / unit-tests (3.13) (push) Failing after 4s
Test llama stack list-deps / list-deps (push) Failing after 4s
Integration Tests (Replay) / Integration Tests (, , , client=, ) (push) Failing after 9s
UI Tests / ui-tests (22) (push) Successful in 48s
Implements AWS Bedrock inference provider using OpenAI-compatible endpoint for Llama models available through Bedrock. Closes: #3410 ## What does this PR do? Adds AWS Bedrock as an inference provider using the OpenAI-compatible endpoint. This lets us use Bedrock models (GPT-OSS, Llama) through the standard llama-stack inference API. The implementation uses LiteLLM's OpenAI client under the hood, so it gets all the OpenAI compatibility features. The provider handles per-request API key overrides via headers. ## Test Plan **Tested the following scenarios:** - Non-streaming completion - basic request/response flow - Streaming completion - SSE streaming with chunked responses - Multi-turn conversations - context retention across turns - Tool calling - function calling with proper tool_calls format # Bedrock OpenAI-Compatible Provider - Test Results **Model:** `bedrock-inference/openai.gpt-oss-20b-1:0` --- ## Test 1: Model Listing **Request:** ```http GET /v1/models HTTP/1.1 ``` **Response:** ```http HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: application/json { "data": [ {"identifier": "bedrock-inference/openai.gpt-oss-20b-1:0", ...}, {"identifier": "bedrock-inference/openai.gpt-oss-40b-1:0", ...} ] } ``` --- ## Test 2: Non-Streaming Completion **Request:** ```http POST /v1/chat/completions HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: application/json { "model": "bedrock-inference/openai.gpt-oss-20b-1:0", "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Say 'Hello from Bedrock' and nothing else"}], "stream": false } ``` **Response:** ```http HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: application/json { "choices": [{ "finish_reason": "stop", "message": {"content": "...Hello from Bedrock"} }], "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 79, "completion_tokens": 50, "total_tokens": 129} } ``` --- ## Test 3: Streaming Completion **Request:** ```http POST /v1/chat/completions HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: application/json { "model": "bedrock-inference/openai.gpt-oss-20b-1:0", "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Count from 1 to 5"}], "stream": true } ``` **Response:** ```http HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: text/event-stream [6 SSE chunks received] Final content: "1, 2, 3, 4, 5" ``` --- ## Test 4: Error Handling - Invalid Model **Request:** ```http POST /v1/chat/completions HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: application/json { "model": "invalid-model-id", "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}], "stream": false } ``` **Response:** ```http HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found Content-Type: application/json { "detail": "Model 'invalid-model-id' not found. Use 'client.models.list()' to list available Models." } ``` --- ## Test 5: Multi-Turn Conversation **Request 1:** ```http POST /v1/chat/completions HTTP/1.1 { "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "My name is Alice"}] } ``` **Response 1:** ```http HTTP/1.1 200 OK { "choices": [{ "message": {"content": "...Nice to meet you, Alice! How can I help you today?"} }] } ``` **Request 2 (with history):** ```http POST /v1/chat/completions HTTP/1.1 { "messages": [ {"role": "user", "content": "My name is Alice"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "...Nice to meet you, Alice!..."}, {"role": "user", "content": "What is my name?"} ] } ``` **Response 2:** ```http HTTP/1.1 200 OK { "choices": [{ "message": {"content": "...Your name is Alice."} }], "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 183, "completion_tokens": 42} } ``` **Context retained across turns** --- ## Test 6: System Messages **Request:** ```http POST /v1/chat/completions HTTP/1.1 { "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are Shakespeare. Respond only in Shakespearean English."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Tell me about the weather"} ] } ``` **Response:** ```http HTTP/1.1 200 OK { "choices": [{ "message": {"content": "Lo! I heed thy request..."} }], "usage": {"completion_tokens": 813} } ``` --- ## Test 7: Tool Calling **Request:** ```http POST /v1/chat/completions HTTP/1.1 { "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "What's the weather in San Francisco?"}], "tools": [{ "type": "function", "function": { "name": "get_weather", "parameters": {"type": "object", "properties": {"location": {"type": "string"}}} } }] } ``` **Response:** ```http HTTP/1.1 200 OK { "choices": [{ "finish_reason": "tool_calls", "message": { "tool_calls": [{ "function": {"name": "get_weather", "arguments": "{\"location\":\"San Francisco\"}"} }] } }] } ``` --- ## Test 8: Sampling Parameters **Request:** ```http POST /v1/chat/completions HTTP/1.1 { "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Say hello"}], "temperature": 0.7, "top_p": 0.9 } ``` **Response:** ```http HTTP/1.1 200 OK { "choices": [{ "message": {"content": "...Hello! 👋 How can I help you today?"} }] } ``` --- ## Test 9: Authentication Error Handling ### Subtest A: Invalid API Key **Request:** ```http POST /v1/chat/completions HTTP/1.1 x-llamastack-provider-data: {"aws_bedrock_api_key": "invalid-fake-key-12345"} {"model": "bedrock-inference/openai.gpt-oss-20b-1:0", ...} ``` **Response:** ```http HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request { "detail": "Invalid value: Authentication failed: Error code: 401 - {'error': {'message': 'Invalid API Key format: Must start with pre-defined prefix', ...}}" } ``` --- ### Subtest B: Empty API Key (Fallback to Config) **Request:** ```http POST /v1/chat/completions HTTP/1.1 x-llamastack-provider-data: {"aws_bedrock_api_key": ""} {"model": "bedrock-inference/openai.gpt-oss-20b-1:0", ...} ``` **Response:** ```http HTTP/1.1 200 OK { "choices": [{ "message": {"content": "...Hello! How can I assist you today?"} }] } ``` **Fell back to config key** --- ### Subtest C: Malformed Token **Request:** ```http POST /v1/chat/completions HTTP/1.1 x-llamastack-provider-data: {"aws_bedrock_api_key": "not-a-valid-bedrock-token-format"} {"model": "bedrock-inference/openai.gpt-oss-20b-1:0", ...} ``` **Response:** ```http HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request { "detail": "Invalid value: Authentication failed: Error code: 401 - {'error': {'message': 'Invalid API Key format: Must start with pre-defined prefix', ...}}" } ``` |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| backward_compat | ||
| common | ||
| containers | ||
| external | ||
| integration | ||
| unit | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| README.md | ||
There are two obvious types of tests:
| Type | Location | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Unit | tests/unit/ |
Fast, isolated component testing |
| Integration | tests/integration/ |
End-to-end workflows with record-replay |
Both have their place. For unit tests, it is important to create minimal mocks and instead rely more on "fakes". Mocks are too brittle. In either case, tests must be very fast and reliable.
Record-replay for integration tests
Testing AI applications end-to-end creates some challenges:
- API costs accumulate quickly during development and CI
- Non-deterministic responses make tests unreliable
- Multiple providers require testing the same logic across different APIs
Our solution: Record real API responses once, replay them for fast, deterministic tests. This is better than mocking because AI APIs have complex response structures and streaming behavior. Mocks can miss edge cases that real APIs exhibit. A single test can exercise underlying APIs in multiple complex ways making it really hard to mock.
This gives you:
- Cost control - No repeated API calls during development
- Speed - Instant test execution with cached responses
- Reliability - Consistent results regardless of external service state
- Provider coverage - Same tests work across OpenAI, Anthropic, local models, etc.
Testing Quick Start
You can run the unit tests with:
uv run --group unit pytest -sv tests/unit/
For running integration tests, you must provide a few things:
-
A stack config. This is a pointer to a stack. You have a few ways to point to a stack:
server:<config>- automatically start a server with the given config (e.g.,server:starter). This provides one-step testing by auto-starting the server if the port is available, or reusing an existing server if already running.server:<config>:<port>- same as above but with a custom port (e.g.,server:starter:8322)- a URL which points to a Llama Stack distribution server
- a distribution name (e.g.,
starter) or a path to arun.yamlfile - a comma-separated list of api=provider pairs, e.g.
inference=fireworks,safety=llama-guard,agents=meta-reference. This is most useful for testing a single API surface.
-
Any API keys you need to use should be set in the environment, or can be passed in with the --env option.
You can run the integration tests in replay mode with:
# Run all tests with existing recordings
uv run --group test \
pytest -sv tests/integration/ --stack-config=starter
Re-recording tests
Local Re-recording (Manual Setup Required)
If you want to re-record tests locally, you can do so with:
LLAMA_STACK_TEST_INFERENCE_MODE=record \
uv run --group test \
pytest -sv tests/integration/ --stack-config=starter -k "<appropriate test name>"
This will record new API responses and overwrite the existing recordings.
You must be careful when re-recording. CI workflows assume a specific setup for running the replay-mode tests. You must re-record the tests in the same way as the CI workflows. This means
- you need Ollama running and serving some specific models.
- you are using the `starter` distribution.
Remote Re-recording (Recommended)
For easier re-recording without local setup, use the automated recording workflow:
# Record tests for specific test subdirectories
./scripts/github/schedule-record-workflow.sh --test-subdirs "agents,inference"
# Record with vision tests enabled
./scripts/github/schedule-record-workflow.sh --test-suite vision
# Record with specific provider
./scripts/github/schedule-record-workflow.sh --test-subdirs "agents" --test-provider vllm
This script:
- 🚀 Runs in GitHub Actions - no local Ollama setup required
- 🔍 Auto-detects your branch and associated PR
- 🍴 Works from forks - handles repository context automatically
- ✅ Commits recordings back to your branch
Prerequisites:
- GitHub CLI:
brew install gh && gh auth login - jq:
brew install jq - Your branch pushed to a remote
Supported providers: vllm, ollama
Next Steps
- Integration Testing Guide - Detailed usage and configuration
- Unit Testing Guide - Fast component testing