API Updates (#73)

* API Keys passed from Client instead of distro configuration

* delete distribution registry

* Rename the "package" word away

* Introduce a "Router" layer for providers

Some providers need to be factorized and considered as thin routing
layers on top of other providers. Consider two examples:

- The inference API should be a routing layer over inference providers,
  routed using the "model" key
- The memory banks API is another instance where various memory bank
  types will be provided by independent providers (e.g., a vector store
  is served by Chroma while a keyvalue memory can be served by Redis or
  PGVector)

This commit introduces a generalized routing layer for this purpose.

* update `apis_to_serve`

* llama_toolchain -> llama_stack

* Codemod from llama_toolchain -> llama_stack

- added providers/registry
- cleaned up api/ subdirectories and moved impls away
- restructured api/api.py
- from llama_stack.apis.<api> import foo should work now
- update imports to do llama_stack.apis.<api>
- update many other imports
- added __init__, fixed some registry imports
- updated registry imports
- create_agentic_system -> create_agent
- AgenticSystem -> Agent

* Moved some stuff out of common/; re-generated OpenAPI spec

* llama-toolchain -> llama-stack (hyphens)

* add control plane API

* add redis adapter + sqlite provider

* move core -> distribution

* Some more toolchain -> stack changes

* small naming shenanigans

* Removing custom tool and agent utilities and moving them client side

* Move control plane to distribution server for now

* Remove control plane from API list

* no codeshield dependency randomly plzzzzz

* Add "fire" as a dependency

* add back event loggers

* stack configure fixes

* use brave instead of bing in the example client

* add init file so it gets packaged

* add init files so it gets packaged

* Update MANIFEST

* bug fix

---------

Co-authored-by: Hardik Shah <hjshah@fb.com>
Co-authored-by: Xi Yan <xiyan@meta.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin@meta.com>

llama_stack/providers/impls/meta_reference/agents/safety.py

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+# Copyright (c) Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates.
+# All rights reserved.
+#
+# This source code is licensed under the terms described in the LICENSE file in
+# the root directory of this source tree.
+
+from typing import List
+
+from llama_models.llama3.api.datatypes import Message, Role, UserMessage
+
+from llama_stack.apis.safety import (
+    OnViolationAction,
+    RunShieldRequest,
+    Safety,
+    ShieldDefinition,
+    ShieldResponse,
+)
+from termcolor import cprint
+
+
+class SafetyException(Exception):  # noqa: N818
+    def __init__(self, response: ShieldResponse):
+        self.response = response
+        super().__init__(response.violation_return_message)
+
+
+class ShieldRunnerMixin:
+    def __init__(
+        self,
+        safety_api: Safety,
+        input_shields: List[ShieldDefinition] = None,
+        output_shields: List[ShieldDefinition] = None,
+    ):
+        self.safety_api = safety_api
+        self.input_shields = input_shields
+        self.output_shields = output_shields
+
+    async def run_shields(
+        self, messages: List[Message], shields: List[ShieldDefinition]
+    ) -> List[ShieldResponse]:
+        messages = messages.copy()
+        # some shields like llama-guard require the first message to be a user message
+        # since this might be a tool call, first role might not be user
+        if len(messages) > 0 and messages[0].role != Role.user.value:
+            messages[0] = UserMessage(content=messages[0].content)
+
+        res = await self.safety_api.run_shields(
+            RunShieldRequest(
+                messages=messages,
+                shields=shields,
+            )
+        )
+
+        results = res.responses
+        for shield, r in zip(shields, results):
+            if r.is_violation:
+                if shield.on_violation_action == OnViolationAction.RAISE:
+                    raise SafetyException(r)
+                elif shield.on_violation_action == OnViolationAction.WARN:
+                    cprint(
+                        f"[Warn]{shield.__class__.__name__} raised a warning",
+                        color="red",
+                    )
+
+        return results