Commit graph

11 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yuan Tang
34ab7a3b6c
Fix precommit check after moving to ruff (#927)
Lint check in main branch is failing. This fixes the lint check after we
moved to ruff in https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/921. We
need to move to a `ruff.toml` file as well as fixing and ignoring some
additional checks.

Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
2025-02-02 06:46:45 -08:00
Ashwin Bharambe
1a7490470a
[memory refactor][3/n] Introduce RAGToolRuntime as a specialized sub-protocol (#832)
See https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/827 for the broader
design.

Third part:
- we need to make `tool_runtime.rag_tool.query_context()` and
`tool_runtime.rag_tool.insert_documents()` methods work smoothly with
complete type safety. To that end, we introduce a sub-resource path
`tool-runtime/rag-tool/` and make changes to the resolver to make things
work.
- the PR updates the agents implementation to directly call these typed
APIs for memory accesses rather than going through the complex, untyped
"invoke_tool" API. the code looks much nicer and simpler (expectedly.)
- there are a number of hacks in the server resolver implementation
still, we will live with some and fix some

Note that we must make sure the client SDKs are able to handle this
subresource complexity also. Stainless has support for subresources, so
this should be possible but beware.

## Test Plan

Our RAG test is sad (doesn't actually test for actual RAG output) but I
verified that the implementation works. I will work on fixing the RAG
test afterwards.

```bash
pytest -s -v tests/agents/test_agents.py -k "rag and together" --safety-shield=meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B
```
2025-01-22 10:04:16 -08:00
Sixian Yi
c79b087552
[test automation] support run tests on config file (#730)
# Context
For test automation, the end goal is to run a single pytest command from
root test directory (llama_stack/providers/tests/.) such that we execute
push-blocking tests

The work plan: 
1) trigger pytest from llama_stack/providers/tests/.
2) use config file to determine what tests and parametrization we want
to run

# What does this PR do?
1) consolidates the "inference-models" / "embedding-model" /
"judge-model" ... options in root conftest.py. Without this change, we
will hit into error when trying to run `pytest
/Users/sxyi/llama-stack/llama_stack/providers/tests/.` because of
duplicated `addoptions` definitions across child conftest files.

2) Add a `config` option to specify test config in YAML. (see
[`ci_test_config.yaml`](https://gist.github.com/sixianyi0721/5b37fbce4069139445c2f06f6e42f87e)
for example config file)

For provider_fixtures, we allow users to use either a default fixture
combination or define their own {api:provider} combinations.

```

memory:
....
  fixtures:
    provider_fixtures:
    - default_fixture_param_id: ollama // use default fixture combination with param_id="ollama" in [providers/tests/memory/conftest.py](https://fburl.com/mtjzwsmk)
    - inference: sentence_transformers
      memory: faiss
    - default_fixture_param_id: chroma

```
3) generate tests according to the config. Logic lives in two places: 
a) in `{api}/conftest.py::pytest_generate_tests`, we read from config to
do parametrization.
b) after test collection, in `pytest_collection_modifyitems`, we filter
the tests to include only functions listed in config.

## Test Plan
1) `pytest /Users/sxyi/llama-stack/llama_stack/providers/tests/.
--collect-only --config=ci_test_config.yaml`

Using `--collect-only` tag to print the pytests listed in the config
file (`ci_test_config.yaml`).

output:
[gist](https://gist.github.com/sixianyi0721/05145e60d4d085c17cfb304beeb1e60e)


2) sanity check on `--inference-model` option

```
pytest -v -s -k "ollama" --inference-model="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct" ./llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py
```


## Before submitting

- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [x] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [x] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
      Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
2025-01-16 12:05:49 -08:00
Dinesh Yeduguru
a5c57cd381
agents to use tools api (#673)
# What does this PR do?

PR #639 introduced the notion of Tools API and ability to invoke tools
through API just as any resource. This PR changes the Agents to start
using the Tools API to invoke tools. Major changes include:
1) Ability to specify tool groups with AgentConfig
2) Agent gets the corresponding tool definitions for the specified tools
and pass along to the model
3) Attachements are now named as Documents and their behavior is mostly
unchanged from user perspective
4) You can specify args that can be injected to a tool call through
Agent config. This is especially useful in case of memory tool, where
you want the tool to operate on a specific memory bank.
5) You can also register tool groups with args, which lets the agent
inject these as well into the tool call.
6) All tests have been migrated to use new tools API and fixtures
including client SDK tests
7) Telemetry just works with tools API because of our trace protocol
decorator


## Test Plan
```
pytest -s -v -k fireworks llama_stack/providers/tests/agents/test_agents.py  \
   --safety-shield=meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B \
   --inference-model=meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

pytest -s -v -k together  llama_stack/providers/tests/tools/test_tools.py \
   --safety-shield=meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B \
   --inference-model=meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG="/Users/dineshyv/.llama/distributions/llamastack-together/together-run.yaml" pytest -v tests/client-sdk/agents/test_agents.py
```
run.yaml:
https://gist.github.com/dineshyv/0365845ad325e1c2cab755788ccc5994

Notebook:
https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1ck7hXQxRl6UvT-ijNRZ-gMZxH1G3cN2d?usp=sharing
2025-01-08 19:01:00 -08:00
Ashwin Bharambe
8de8eb03c8
Update the "InterleavedTextMedia" type (#635)
## What does this PR do?

This is a long-pending change and particularly important to get done
now.

Specifically:
- we cannot "localize" (aka download) any URLs from media attachments
anywhere near our modeling code. it must be done within llama-stack.
- `PIL.Image` is infesting all our APIs via `ImageMedia ->
InterleavedTextMedia` and that cannot be right at all. Anything in the
API surface must be "naturally serializable". We need a standard `{
type: "image", image_url: "<...>" }` which is more extensible
- `UserMessage`, `SystemMessage`, etc. are moved completely to
llama-stack from the llama-models repository.

See https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/pull/244 for the
corresponding PR in llama-models.

## Test Plan

```bash
cd llama_stack/providers/tests

pytest -s -v -k "fireworks or ollama or together" inference/test_vision_inference.py
pytest -s -v -k "(fireworks or ollama or together) and llama_3b" inference/test_text_inference.py
pytest -s -v -k chroma memory/test_memory.py \
  --env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=384 --env CHROMA_DB_PATH=/tmp/foobar

pytest -s -v -k fireworks agents/test_agents.py  \
   --safety-shield=meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B \
   --inference-model=meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
```

Updated the client sdk (see PR ...), installed the SDK in the same
environment and then ran the SDK tests:

```bash
cd tests/client-sdk
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=together pytest -s -v agents/test_agents.py
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=ollama pytest -s -v memory/test_memory.py

# this one needed a bit of hacking in the run.yaml to ensure I could register the vision model correctly
INFERENCE_MODEL=llama3.2-vision:latest LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=ollama pytest -s -v inference/test_inference.py
```
2024-12-17 11:18:31 -08:00
Xi Yan
50d539e6d7 update tests --inference-model to hf id 2024-11-18 17:36:58 -08:00
Ashwin Bharambe
12947ac19e
Kill "remote" providers and fix testing with a remote stack properly (#435)
# What does this PR do?

This PR kills the notion of "pure passthrough" remote providers. You
cannot specify a single provider you must specify a whole distribution
(stack) as remote.

This PR also significantly fixes / upgrades testing infrastructure so
you can now test against a remotely hosted stack server by just doing

```bash
pytest -s -v -m remote  test_agents.py \
  --inference-model=Llama3.1-8B-Instruct --safety-shield=Llama-Guard-3-1B \
  --env REMOTE_STACK_URL=http://localhost:5001
```

Also fixed `test_agents_persistence.py` (which was broken) and killed
some deprecated testing functions.

## Test Plan

All the tests.
2024-11-12 21:51:29 -08:00
Ashwin Bharambe
d9d271a684
Allow specifying resources in StackRunConfig (#425)
# What does this PR do? 

This PR brings back the facility to not force registration of resources
onto the user. This is not just annoying but actually not feasible
sometimes. For example, you may have a Stack which boots up with private
providers for inference for models A and B. There is no way for the user
to actually know which model is being served by these providers now (to
be able to register it.)

How will this avoid the users needing to do registration? In a follow-up
diff, I will make sure I update the sample run.yaml files so they list
the models served by the distributions explicitly. So when users do
`llama stack build --template <...>` and run it, their distributions
come up with the right set of models they expect.

For self-hosted distributions, it also allows us to have a place to
explicit list the models that need to be served to make the "complete"
stack (including safety, e.g.)

## Test Plan

Started ollama locally with two lightweight models: Llama3.2-3B-Instruct
and Llama-Guard-3-1B.

Updated all the tests including agents. Here's the tests I ran so far:

```bash
pytest -s -v -m "fireworks and llama_3b" test_text_inference.py::TestInference \
  --env FIREWORKS_API_KEY=...

pytest -s -v -m "ollama and llama_3b" test_text_inference.py::TestInference 

pytest -s -v -m ollama test_safety.py

pytest -s -v -m faiss test_memory.py

pytest -s -v -m ollama  test_agents.py \
  --inference-model=Llama3.2-3B-Instruct --safety-model=Llama-Guard-3-1B
```

Found a few bugs here and there pre-existing that these test runs fixed.
2024-11-12 10:58:49 -08:00
Ashwin Bharambe
c1f7ba3aed
Split safety into (llama-guard, prompt-guard, code-scanner) (#400)
Splits the meta-reference safety implementation into three distinct providers:

- inline::llama-guard
- inline::prompt-guard
- inline::code-scanner

Note that this PR is a backward incompatible change to the llama stack server. I have added deprecation_error field to ProviderSpec -- the server reads it and immediately barfs. This is used to direct the user with a specific message on what action to perform. An automagical "config upgrade" is a bit too much work to implement right now :/

(Note that we will be gradually prefixing all inline providers with inline:: -- I am only doing this for this set of new providers because otherwise existing configuration files will break even more badly.)
2024-11-11 09:29:18 -08:00
Ashwin Bharambe
7cf4c905f3 add support for remote providers in tests 2024-11-04 20:30:46 -08:00
Ashwin Bharambe
ffedb81c11
Significantly simpler and malleable test setup (#360)
* Significantly simpler and malleable test setup

* convert memory tests

* refactor fixtures and add support for composable fixtures

* Fix memory to use the newer fixture organization

* Get agents tests working

* Safety tests work

* yet another refactor to make this more general

now it accepts --inference-model, --safety-model options also

* get multiple providers working for meta-reference (for inference + safety)

* Add README.md

---------

Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin@meta.com>
2024-11-04 17:36:43 -08:00