forked from phoenix-oss/llama-stack-mirror
3 commits
Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
69554158fa
|
feat: add health to all providers through providers endpoint (#1418)
The `/v1/providers` now reports the health status of each provider when implemented. ``` curl -L http://127.0.0.1:8321/v1/providers|jq % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 4072 100 4072 0 0 246k 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 248k { "data": [ { "api": "inference", "provider_id": "ollama", "provider_type": "remote::ollama", "config": { "url": "http://localhost:11434" }, "health": { "status": "OK" } }, { "api": "vector_io", "provider_id": "faiss", "provider_type": "inline::faiss", "config": { "kvstore": { "type": "sqlite", "namespace": null, "db_path": "/Users/leseb/.llama/distributions/ollama/faiss_store.db" } }, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "safety", "provider_id": "llama-guard", "provider_type": "inline::llama-guard", "config": { "excluded_categories": [] }, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "agents", "provider_id": "meta-reference", "provider_type": "inline::meta-reference", "config": { "persistence_store": { "type": "sqlite", "namespace": null, "db_path": "/Users/leseb/.llama/distributions/ollama/agents_store.db" } }, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "telemetry", "provider_id": "meta-reference", "provider_type": "inline::meta-reference", "config": { "service_name": "llama-stack", "sinks": "console,sqlite", "sqlite_db_path": "/Users/leseb/.llama/distributions/ollama/trace_store.db" }, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "eval", "provider_id": "meta-reference", "provider_type": "inline::meta-reference", "config": { "kvstore": { "type": "sqlite", "namespace": null, "db_path": "/Users/leseb/.llama/distributions/ollama/meta_reference_eval.db" } }, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "datasetio", "provider_id": "huggingface", "provider_type": "remote::huggingface", "config": { "kvstore": { "type": "sqlite", "namespace": null, "db_path": "/Users/leseb/.llama/distributions/ollama/huggingface_datasetio.db" } }, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "datasetio", "provider_id": "localfs", "provider_type": "inline::localfs", "config": { "kvstore": { "type": "sqlite", "namespace": null, "db_path": "/Users/leseb/.llama/distributions/ollama/localfs_datasetio.db" } }, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "scoring", "provider_id": "basic", "provider_type": "inline::basic", "config": {}, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "scoring", "provider_id": "llm-as-judge", "provider_type": "inline::llm-as-judge", "config": {}, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "scoring", "provider_id": "braintrust", "provider_type": "inline::braintrust", "config": { "openai_api_key": "********" }, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "tool_runtime", "provider_id": "brave-search", "provider_type": "remote::brave-search", "config": { "api_key": "********", "max_results": 3 }, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "tool_runtime", "provider_id": "tavily-search", "provider_type": "remote::tavily-search", "config": { "api_key": "********", "max_results": 3 }, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "tool_runtime", "provider_id": "code-interpreter", "provider_type": "inline::code-interpreter", "config": {}, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "tool_runtime", "provider_id": "rag-runtime", "provider_type": "inline::rag-runtime", "config": {}, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "tool_runtime", "provider_id": "model-context-protocol", "provider_type": "remote::model-context-protocol", "config": {}, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } }, { "api": "tool_runtime", "provider_id": "wolfram-alpha", "provider_type": "remote::wolfram-alpha", "config": { "api_key": "********" }, "health": { "status": "Not Implemented", "message": "Provider does not implement health check" } } ] } ``` Per providers too: ``` curl -L http://127.0.0.1:8321/v1/providers/ollama {"api":"inference","provider_id":"ollama","provider_type":"remote::ollama","config":{"url":"http://localhost:11434"},"health":{"status":"OK"}} ``` Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com> |
||
|
33b096cc21
|
fix: OpenAPI with provider get (#1627)
# What does this PR do? - https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1429 introduces GetProviderResponse in OpenAPI, which is not needed, and not correctly defined. cc @cdoern [//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below) [//]: # (Closes #[issue-number]) ## Test Plan ``` llama-stack-client providers list ``` <img width="610" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2f7b62a5-daf2-4bf9-9505-69755c7025fc" /> [//]: # (## Documentation) |
||
|
a062723d03
|
feat: add provider API for listing and inspecting provider info (#1429)
# What does this PR do? currently the `inspect` API for providers is really a `list` API. Create a new `providers` API which has a GET `providers/{provider_id}` inspect API which returns "user friendly" configuration to the end user. Also add a GET `/providers` endpoint which returns the list of providers as `inspect/providers` does today. This API follows CRUD and is more intuitive/RESTful. This work is part of the RFC at https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1359 sensitive fields are redacted using `redact_sensetive_fields` on the server side before returning a response: <img width="456" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-13 at 4 40 21 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9465c221-2a26-42f8-a08a-6ac4a9fecce8" /> ## Test Plan using https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-client-python/pull/181 a user is able to to run the following: `llama stack build --template ollama --image-type venv` `llama stack run --image-type venv ~/.llama/distributions/ollama/ollama-run.yaml` `llama-stack-client providers inspect ollama` <img width="378" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-13 at 4 39 35 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8273d05d-8bc3-44c6-9e4b-ef95e48d5466" /> also, was able to run the new test_list integration test locally with ollama: <img width="1509" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-13 at 11 03 40 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9b9db166-f02f-45b0-86a4-306d85149bc8" /> Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com> |