Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ihar Hrachyshka
9e6561a1ec
chore: enable pyupgrade fixes (#1806)
# What does this PR do?

The goal of this PR is code base modernization.

Schema reflection code needed a minor adjustment to handle UnionTypes
and collections.abc.AsyncIterator. (Both are preferred for latest Python
releases.)

Note to reviewers: almost all changes here are automatically generated
by pyupgrade. Some additional unused imports were cleaned up. The only
change worth of note can be found under `docs/openapi_generator` and
`llama_stack/strong_typing/schema.py` where reflection code was updated
to deal with "newer" types.

Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
2025-05-01 14:23:50 -07:00
Ashwin Bharambe
d072b5fa0c
test: add unit test to ensure all config types are instantiable (#1601) 2025-03-12 22:29:58 -07:00
Botao Chen
123fb9eb24
feat: [post training] support save hf safetensor format checkpoint (#845)
## context

Now, in llama stack, we only support inference / eval a finetuned
checkpoint with meta-reference as inference provider. This is
sub-optimal since meta-reference is pretty slow.

Our vision is that developer can inference / eval a finetuned checkpoint
produced by post training apis with all the inference providers on the
stack. To achieve this, we'd like to define an unified output checkpoint
format for post training providers. So that, all the inference provider
can respect that format for customized model inference.

By spotting check how
[ollama](https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/main/docs/import.md) and
[fireworks](https://docs.fireworks.ai/models/uploading-custom-models) do
inference on a customized model, we defined the output checkpoint format
as /adapter/adapter_config.json and /adapter/adapter_model.safetensors
(as we only support LoRA post training now, we begin from adapter only
checkpoint)

## test
we kick off a post training job and configured checkpoint format as
'huggingface'. Output files
![Screenshot 2025-02-24 at 11 54
33 PM](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fb45a5d7-f288-4d30-82f8-b7a8da2859be)



we did a proof of concept with ollama to see if ollama can inference our
finetuned checkpoint
1. create Modelfile like 

<img width="799" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-22 at 5 04 18 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7fca9ac3-a294-44f8-aab1-83852c600609"
/>

2. create a customized model with `ollama create llama_3_2_finetuned`
and run inference successfully

![Screenshot 2025-02-24 at 11 55
17 PM](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1abe7c52-c6a7-491a-b07c-b7a8e3fd1ddd)


This is just a proof of concept with ollama cmd line. As next step, we'd
like to wrap loading / inference customized model logic in the inference
provider implementation.
2025-02-25 23:29:08 -08:00
Botao Chen
aeb76390fc
[1/n] torchtune <> llama-stack integration skeleton (#540)
### Context 
This is the 1st of series PRs that integrate torchtune with llama-stack
as meta reference post-training implementation. For MVP, we will focus
on single device LoRA SFT.

Though this PR is still WIP, we want to get early feedback on the high
level design of this skeleton while still working on several details

### Scope
To limit the scope of this PR, we focus on the skeleton of the
implementation.

**What are included?**
- refine the post-training SFT apis
- skeleton of supervised_fine_tune implementation. We verified that we
can call the supervised_fine_tune API successfully from llama stack
client SDK (client side PR:
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-client-python/pull/51)
- a very basic single device LoRA training recipe based on torchtune
core components
- parity check with torchtune library and post training api unit test

**What are not includes?**
- implementation of other job management, get training artifacts apis
(separate PR)
- refactor the meta reference inference logic to support eval on
finetuned model (separate PR)
- several necessary functionality in the training recipe such as
logging, validation etc (separate PR)
- interop with telemetry for tracing and metrics logging, currently
temporarily log to local disk (separate PR)

### Testing
**e2e test**
Although we haven't added detailed testing and numerical parity check
with torchtune yet, we did a simple E2E test from client to server
1. setup server with` llama stack build --template
experimental-post-training --image-type conda` and `llama stack run
experimental-post-training `
2. On client, run `llama-stack-client --endpoint
http://devgpu018.nha2.facebook.com:5000 post_training
supervised_fine_tune`
3. Training finishes successfully. On server side, get the finetune
checkpoints under output dir. On client side, get the job uuid

server 
<img width="1110" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-02 at 5 52 32 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b548eb90-7a9b-4edc-a858-ee237cc4361d">

client 
<img width="807" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-02 at 5 52 37 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1138ffa8-4698-40fa-b190-3d7b99646838">

**parity check**
torchtune dataloader output and llama-stack post training dataloader
output are same
<img width="1116" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-04 at 8 18 46 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5e295cdc-4c24-4ea6-82c0-ca96ef1bd6ee">

torchtune LoRA SFT and llama-stack post training LoRA SFT on alpaca
dataset with llama3.2 3B instruct model are numerical match

<img width="860" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-04 at 8 17 01 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c05cf0a8-c674-4d2e-9f0a-c5d01b2dca99">

<img width="1049" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-04 at 8 17 06 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b911d4e2-e7b1-41a9-b62c-d75529b6d443">

**unit test ** 
![Uploading Screenshot 2024-12-09 at 1.35.10 PM.png…]()
2024-12-13 11:05:35 -08:00