# What does this PR do?
- Makes Llama 70B 3.3 available for fireworks
## Test Plan
```shell
pip install -e . \
&& llama stack build --config distributions/fireworks/build.yaml --image-type conda \
&& llama stack run distributions/fireworks/run.yaml \
--port 5000
```
```python
response = client.inference.chat_completion(
model_id="Llama3.3-70B-Instruct",
messages=[
{"role": "user", "content": "hello world"},
],
)
```
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [x] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [x] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
## What does this PR do?
In this PR, we refactor the meta reference inference logic to support
- load the model during registering model instead of during spinning up
server
- support inference finetuned model checkpoint on top of native llama
model
## Why need these changes
To solve the existing pain points that
- user cannot lazy load the model and hot switch the inference
checkpoint after spinning up the server
- this blocks us doing inference and eval on the same sever for a
finetuned checkpoint after post training
- user cannot do inference on a finetuned checkpoint on top of native
llama models
## Expect user experience change
- The inference model won't be loaded when spinning up server. Instead,
it will be loaded during register model. If user add the model as models
resource in run.yaml, it will be registered and loaded automatically
when starting server. There is an optional flag 'skip_initialize' in
model metadata to skip model loading during registration.
- There is an optional flag 'llama_model' in model metadata to identify
the base model of the Model class for validation and initialize model
arch. model identifier no longer needs to be a native llama model
- the default inference model name updates from
'meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct' to 'Llama3.2-3B-Instruct'
- It aligns with the checkpoint folder name after running 'llama model
download'
- It aligns with the descriptor name defined in llama-models SKU list
bf5b0c4fe7/models/datatypes.py (L95)
## test
run python llama_stack/scripts/distro_codegen.py
**run unit test**
- torchrun $CONDA_PREFIX/bin/pytest -v -s -k "meta_reference"
--inference-model="Llama3.1-8B-Instruct"
./llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py
- torchrun $CONDA_PREFIX/bin/pytest -v -s -k "meta_reference"
--inference-model="Llama3.1-8B-Instruct"
./llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_model_registration.py
**test post training experience**
on server side run: llama stack run
llama_stack/templates/experimental-post-training/run.yaml
server is spinning up without model loaded
<img width="812" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-17 at 1 24 50 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ce1f606b-3b6f-452f-b48e-b3761ffd90f3"
/>
on client side, run: llama-stack-client --endpoint
http://devgpu018.nha2.facebook.com:5000 models register
Llama3.2-3B-Instruct
register model successfully and the model is loaded
<img width="1111" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-17 at 1 26 30 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56e02131-cf7d-4de5-8f63-fbdcb8c55c26"
/>
<img width="1541" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-17 at 1 26 09 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a83255a1-20f5-40a2-af51-55641410a115"
/>
if add "skip_initialize" in metadata, model is registered but isn't
loaded
on client side, run: llama-stack-client --endpoint
http://devgpu018.nha2.facebook.com:5000 inference chat-completion
--message "hello, what model are you?"
Inference the model succesfully
<img width="1121" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-17 at 1 27 33 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8e708545-3fe7-4a73-8754-1470fa5f1e75"
/>
**test inference experience**
run: llama stack run llama_stack/templates/meta-reference-gpu/run.yaml
model is loaded since the model is in resouce list in run.yaml
<img width="1537" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-17 at 1 30 19 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5c8af817-66eb-43f8-bf4c-f5e24b0a12c6"
/>
on client side, run: llama-stack-client --endpoint
http://devgpu018.nha2.facebook.com:5000 inference chat-completion
--message "hello, what model are you?"
inference successfully
<img width="1123" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-17 at 1 31 08 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/471809aa-c65e-46dc-a37e-7094fb857f97"
/>
## inference on a finetuned model
**register a finetuned model that finetuned by post training api
(torchtune)**
- the model is registered and loaded successfully
- the model is shown up in the model list
<img width="974" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-18 at 3 56 33 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2994b4f5-4fa9-40c6-acc6-4b971479f3e2"
/>
**run inference**
<img width="977" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-18 at 3 57 59 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d117abbc-b2a0-41d8-a028-1a13128787b2"
/>
# What does this PR do?
Cerebras is rolling out support for llama 3.3 70b and deprecating llama
3.1 70b. This PR updates the documentation, config, and internal mapping
to reflect this change.
cc: @ashwinb @raghotham
# What does this PR do?
**Why**
- When AgentConfig has no `input_shields` / `output_shields` defined, we
still outputs a shield_call step with violation=None. This is impossible
to distinguish the case b/w (1) no violation from running shields v.s.
(2) no shields call
**What**
- We should not have a shield_call step when no `input_shields` /
`output_shields` are defined.
- Also removes a never reached try/catch code block in agent loop.
`run_multiple_shields` is never called in the try block (verified by
stacktrace print)
**Side Note**
- pre-commit fix
## Test Plan
Tested w/ DirectClient via:
https://gist.github.com/yanxi0830/b48f2a53b6f5391b9ff1e39992bc05b3
**No Shields**
<img width="858" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/67319370-329f-4954-bd16-d21ce54c6ebf"
/>
**With Input + Output Shields**
<img width="854" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/75ab1bee-3ba9-4549-ab51-23210be83da7"
/>
**Input Shields Only**
<img width="858" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1897206b-13dd-4ea5-92c2-b39bf68e9286"
/>
E2E pytest
```
LLAMA_STACK_BASE_URL=http://localhost:5000 pytest -v ./tests/client-sdk/agents/test_agents.py
```
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [ ] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
# What does this PR do?
Adds the sentence transformer provider and the `all-MiniLM-L6-v2`
embedding model to the default models to register in the run.yaml for
all providers.
## Test Plan
llama stack build --template together --image-type conda
llama stack run
~/.llama/distributions/llamastack-together/together-run.yaml
### Context
This is the 1st of series PRs that integrate torchtune with llama-stack
as meta reference post-training implementation. For MVP, we will focus
on single device LoRA SFT.
Though this PR is still WIP, we want to get early feedback on the high
level design of this skeleton while still working on several details
### Scope
To limit the scope of this PR, we focus on the skeleton of the
implementation.
**What are included?**
- refine the post-training SFT apis
- skeleton of supervised_fine_tune implementation. We verified that we
can call the supervised_fine_tune API successfully from llama stack
client SDK (client side PR:
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-client-python/pull/51)
- a very basic single device LoRA training recipe based on torchtune
core components
- parity check with torchtune library and post training api unit test
**What are not includes?**
- implementation of other job management, get training artifacts apis
(separate PR)
- refactor the meta reference inference logic to support eval on
finetuned model (separate PR)
- several necessary functionality in the training recipe such as
logging, validation etc (separate PR)
- interop with telemetry for tracing and metrics logging, currently
temporarily log to local disk (separate PR)
### Testing
**e2e test**
Although we haven't added detailed testing and numerical parity check
with torchtune yet, we did a simple E2E test from client to server
1. setup server with` llama stack build --template
experimental-post-training --image-type conda` and `llama stack run
experimental-post-training `
2. On client, run `llama-stack-client --endpoint
http://devgpu018.nha2.facebook.com:5000 post_training
supervised_fine_tune`
3. Training finishes successfully. On server side, get the finetune
checkpoints under output dir. On client side, get the job uuid
server
<img width="1110" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-02 at 5 52 32 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b548eb90-7a9b-4edc-a858-ee237cc4361d">
client
<img width="807" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-02 at 5 52 37 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1138ffa8-4698-40fa-b190-3d7b99646838">
**parity check**
torchtune dataloader output and llama-stack post training dataloader
output are same
<img width="1116" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-04 at 8 18 46 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5e295cdc-4c24-4ea6-82c0-ca96ef1bd6ee">
torchtune LoRA SFT and llama-stack post training LoRA SFT on alpaca
dataset with llama3.2 3B instruct model are numerical match
<img width="860" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-04 at 8 17 01 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c05cf0a8-c674-4d2e-9f0a-c5d01b2dca99">
<img width="1049" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-04 at 8 17 06 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b911d4e2-e7b1-41a9-b62c-d75529b6d443">
**unit test **
![Uploading Screenshot 2024-12-09 at 1.35.10 PM.png…]()
# What does this PR do?
- Addresses issue (#586 )
## Test Plan
```
python llama_stack/scripts/distro_codegen.py
```
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [ ] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
# What does this PR do?
Many of the URLs pointing to the Llama Stack's Read The Docs webpages
were broken, presumably due to recent refactor of the documentation.
This PR fixes all effected URLs throughout the repository.
# What does this PR do?
Automatically generates
- build.yaml
- run.yaml
- run-with-safety.yaml
- parts of markdown docs
for the distributions.
## Test Plan
At this point, this only updates the YAMLs and the docs. Some testing
(especially with ollama and vllm) has been performed but needs to be
much more tested.
Splits the meta-reference safety implementation into three distinct providers:
- inline::llama-guard
- inline::prompt-guard
- inline::code-scanner
Note that this PR is a backward incompatible change to the llama stack server. I have added deprecation_error field to ProviderSpec -- the server reads it and immediately barfs. This is used to direct the user with a specific message on what action to perform. An automagical "config upgrade" is a bit too much work to implement right now :/
(Note that we will be gradually prefixing all inline providers with inline:: -- I am only doing this for this set of new providers because otherwise existing configuration files will break even more badly.)
