# What does this PR do?
I was encountering build issues when building my `ollama` environment
using `llama stack build`
```bash
llama stack build --template ollama --image-type venv
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/farceo/dev/llama-stack/.venv/bin/llama", line 10, in <module>
sys.exit(main())
^^^^^^
File "/Users/farceo/dev/llama-stack/llama_stack/cli/llama.py", line 46, in main
parser.run(args)
File "/Users/farceo/dev/llama-stack/llama_stack/cli/llama.py", line 40, in run
args.func(args)
File "/Users/farceo/dev/llama-stack/llama_stack/cli/stack/build.py", line 77, in _run_stack_build_command
return run_stack_build_command(args)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/Users/farceo/dev/llama-stack/llama_stack/cli/stack/_build.py", line 180, in run_stack_build_command
_run_stack_build_command_from_build_config(
File "/Users/farceo/dev/llama-stack/llama_stack/cli/stack/_build.py", line 272, in _run_stack_build_command_from_build_config
return_code = build_image(
^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/Users/farceo/dev/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/build.py", line 137, in build_image
return_code = run_with_pty(args)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/Users/farceo/dev/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/utils/exec.py", line 22, in run_with_pty
return _run_with_pty_unix(command)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/Users/farceo/dev/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/utils/exec.py", line 53, in _run_with_pty_unix
process = subprocess.Popen(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/Users/farceo/.local/share/uv/python/cpython-3.11.6-macos-aarch64-none/lib/python3.11/subprocess.py", line 1026, in __init__
self._execute_child(args, executable, preexec_fn, close_fds,
File "/Users/farceo/.local/share/uv/python/cpython-3.11.6-macos-aarch64-none/lib/python3.11/subprocess.py", line 1950, in _execute_child
raise child_exception_type(errno_num, err_msg, err_filename)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/Users/farceo/dev/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/build_venv.sh'
make: *** [build-ollama] Error 1
```
I also had to adjust the script when testing the `common.sh` file
because it returned:
```bash
> source llama_stack/distribution/common.sh
llama_stack/distribution/common.sh:6: command not found: ^M
llama_stack/distribution/common.sh:50: parse error near `\n'
```
On my branch, I ran:
```bash
sed -i '' 's/\r$//' llama_stack/distribution/common.sh
```
And then I was able to successfully build the environment.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
N/A
[//]: # (## Documentation)
N/A
---------
Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Arceo <farceo@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
- Configured ruff linter to automatically fix import sorting issues.
- Set --exit-non-zero-on-fix to ensure non-zero exit code when fixes are
applied.
- Enabled the 'I' selection to focus on import-related linting rules.
- Ran the linter, and formatted all codebase imports accordingly.
- Removed the black dep from the "dev" group since we use ruff
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
[//]: # (## Documentation)
[//]: # (- [ ] Added a Changelog entry if the change is significant)
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Lint check in main branch is failing. This fixes the lint check after we
moved to ruff in https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/921. We
need to move to a `ruff.toml` file as well as fixing and ignoring some
additional checks.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
This PR implements windows platform support for build_container.sh
execution from terminal. Additionally, it resolves "no support for
Terminos and PTY for Window PC" issues.
- [x] Addresses issue (#issue)
Releates issues: https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/826,
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/726
## Test Plan
Changes were tested manually by executing standard scripts from LLama
guide:
- llama stack build --template ollama --image-type container
- llama stack build --list-templates
- llama stack build
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [x] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [x] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
# What does this PR do?
- Add Github workflow for publishing docker images.
- Manual Inputs
- We can use a (1) TestPyPi version / (2) build via released PyPi
version
**Notes**
- Keep this workflow manually triggered as we don't want to publish
nightly docker images
**Additional Changes**
- Resolve issue with running llama stack build in non-terminal device
```
File "/home/runner/.local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/llama_stack/distribution/utils/exec.py", line 25, in run_with_pty
old_settings = termios.tcgetattr(sys.stdin)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
termios.error: (25, 'Inappropriate ioctl for device')
```
- Modified build_container.sh to work in non-terminal environment
## Test Plan
- Triggered workflow:
3562217878
<img width="1076" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f1b5cef6-05ab-49c7-b405-53abc9264734"
/>
- Tested published docker image
<img width="702" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e7135189-65c8-45d8-86f9-9f3be70e380b"
/>
- /tools API endpoints are served so that docker is correctly using the
TestPyPi package
<img width="296" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bbcaa7fe-c0a4-4d22-b600-90e3c254bbfd"
/>
- Published tagged images:
https://hub.docker.com/repositories/llamastack
<img width="947" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2a0a0494-4d45-4643-bc29-72154ecc54a5"
/>
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [ ] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
# What does this PR do?
This PR moves all print statements to use logging. Things changed:
- Had to add `await start_trace("sse_generator")` to server.py to
actually get tracing working. else was not seeing any logs
- If no telemetry provider is provided in the run.yaml, we will write to
stdout
- by default, the logs are going to be in JSON, but we expose an option
to configure to output in a human readable way.
This is yet another of those large PRs (hopefully we will have less and less of them as things mature fast). This one introduces substantial improvements and some simplifications to the stack.
Most important bits:
* Agents reference implementation now has support for session / turn persistence. The default implementation uses sqlite but there's also support for using Redis.
* We have re-architected the structure of the Stack APIs to allow for more flexible routing. The motivating use cases are:
- routing model A to ollama and model B to a remote provider like Together
- routing shield A to local impl while shield B to a remote provider like Bedrock
- routing a vector memory bank to Weaviate while routing a keyvalue memory bank to Redis
* Support for provider specific parameters to be passed from the clients. A client can pass data using `x_llamastack_provider_data` parameter which can be type-checked and provided to the Adapter implementations.
* API Keys passed from Client instead of distro configuration
* delete distribution registry
* Rename the "package" word away
* Introduce a "Router" layer for providers
Some providers need to be factorized and considered as thin routing
layers on top of other providers. Consider two examples:
- The inference API should be a routing layer over inference providers,
routed using the "model" key
- The memory banks API is another instance where various memory bank
types will be provided by independent providers (e.g., a vector store
is served by Chroma while a keyvalue memory can be served by Redis or
PGVector)
This commit introduces a generalized routing layer for this purpose.
* update `apis_to_serve`
* llama_toolchain -> llama_stack
* Codemod from llama_toolchain -> llama_stack
- added providers/registry
- cleaned up api/ subdirectories and moved impls away
- restructured api/api.py
- from llama_stack.apis.<api> import foo should work now
- update imports to do llama_stack.apis.<api>
- update many other imports
- added __init__, fixed some registry imports
- updated registry imports
- create_agentic_system -> create_agent
- AgenticSystem -> Agent
* Moved some stuff out of common/; re-generated OpenAPI spec
* llama-toolchain -> llama-stack (hyphens)
* add control plane API
* add redis adapter + sqlite provider
* move core -> distribution
* Some more toolchain -> stack changes
* small naming shenanigans
* Removing custom tool and agent utilities and moving them client side
* Move control plane to distribution server for now
* Remove control plane from API list
* no codeshield dependency randomly plzzzzz
* Add "fire" as a dependency
* add back event loggers
* stack configure fixes
* use brave instead of bing in the example client
* add init file so it gets packaged
* add init files so it gets packaged
* Update MANIFEST
* bug fix
---------
Co-authored-by: Hardik Shah <hjshah@fb.com>
Co-authored-by: Xi Yan <xiyan@meta.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin@meta.com>
