# What does this PR do?
This commit significantly improves the environment variable substitution
functionality in Llama Stack configuration files:
* The version field in configuration files has been changed from string
to integer type for better type consistency across build and run
configurations.
* The environment variable substitution system for ${env.FOO:} was fixed
and properly returns an error
* The environment variable substitution system for ${env.FOO+} returns
None instead of an empty strings, it better matches type annotations in
config fields
* The system includes automatic type conversion for boolean, integer,
and float values.
* The error messages have been enhanced to provide clearer guidance when
environment variables are missing, including suggestions for using
default values or conditional syntax.
* Comprehensive documentation has been added to the configuration guide
explaining all supported syntax patterns, best practices, and runtime
override capabilities.
* Multiple provider configurations have been updated to use the new
conditional syntax for optional API keys, making the system more
flexible for different deployment scenarios. The telemetry configuration
has been improved to properly handle optional endpoints with appropriate
validation, ensuring that required endpoints are specified when their
corresponding sinks are enabled.
* There were many instances of ${env.NVIDIA_API_KEY:} that should have
caused the code to fail. However, due to a bug, the distro server was
still being started, and early validation wasn’t triggered. As a result,
failures were likely being handled downstream by the providers. I’ve
maintained similar behavior by using ${env.NVIDIA_API_KEY:+}, though I
believe this is incorrect for many configurations. I’ll leave it to each
provider to correct it as needed.
* Environment variable substitution now uses the same syntax as Bash
parameter expansion.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
Adds a new endpoint that is compatible with OpenAI for embeddings api.
`/openai/v1/embeddings`
Added providers for OpenAI, LiteLLM and SentenceTransformer.
## Test Plan
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 pytest -sv tests/integration/inference/test_openai_embeddings.py --embedding-model all-MiniLM-L6-v2,text-embedding-3-small,gemini/text-embedding-004
```
# What does this PR do?
This PR introduces APIs to retrieve past chat completion requests, which
will be used in the LS UI.
Our current `Telemetry` is ill-suited for this purpose as it's untyped
so we'd need to filter by obscure attribute names, making it brittle.
Since these APIs are 'provided by stack' and don't need to be
implemented by inference providers, we introduce a new InferenceProvider
class, containing the existing inference protocol, which is implemented
by inference providers.
The APIs are OpenAI-compliant, with an additional `input_messages`
field.
## Test Plan
This PR just adds the API and marks them provided_by_stack. S
tart stack server -> doesn't crash
# What does this PR do?
The goal of this PR is code base modernization.
Schema reflection code needed a minor adjustment to handle UnionTypes
and collections.abc.AsyncIterator. (Both are preferred for latest Python
releases.)
Note to reviewers: almost all changes here are automatically generated
by pyupgrade. Some additional unused imports were cleaned up. The only
change worth of note can be found under `docs/openapi_generator` and
`llama_stack/strong_typing/schema.py` where reflection code was updated
to deal with "newer" types.
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
Test plan:
python tests/verifications/generate_report.py --providers
fireworks,together,llama_meta_ref,openai
Co-authored-by: Eric Huang <erichuang@fb.com>
# What does this PR do?
TLDR: Changes needed to get 100% passing tests for OpenAI API
verification tests when run against Llama Stack with the `together`,
`fireworks`, and `openai` providers. And `groq` is better than before,
at 88% passing.
This cleans up the OpenAI API support for image message types
(specifically `image_url` types) and handling of the `response_format`
chat completion parameter. Both of these required a few more Pydantic
model definitions in our Inference API, just to move from the
not-quite-right stubs I had in place to something fleshed out to match
the actual OpenAI API specs.
As part of testing this, I also found and fixed a bug in the litellm
implementation of openai_completion and openai_chat_completion, so the
providers based on those should actually be working now.
The method `prepare_openai_completion_params` in
`llama_stack/providers/utils/inference/openai_compat.py` was improved to
actually recursively clean up input parameters, including handling of
lists, dicts, and dumping of Pydantic models to dicts. These changes
were required to get to 100% passing tests on the OpenAI API
verification against the `openai` provider.
With the above, the together.ai provider was passing as well as it is
without Llama Stack. But, since we have Llama Stack in the middle, I
took the opportunity to clean up the together.ai provider so that it now
also passes the OpenAI API spec tests we have at 100%. That means
together.ai is now passing our verification test better when using an
OpenAI client talking to Llama Stack than it is when hitting together.ai
directly, without Llama Stack in the middle.
And, another round of work for Fireworks to improve translation of
incoming OpenAI chat completion requests to Llama Stack chat completion
requests gets the fireworks provider passing at 100%. The server-side
fireworks.ai tool calling support with OpenAI chat completions and Llama
4 models isn't great yet, but by pointing the OpenAI clients at Llama
Stack's API we can clean things up and get everything working as
expected for Llama 4 models.
## Test Plan
### OpenAI API Verification Tests
I ran the OpenAI API verification tests as below and 100% of the tests
passed.
First, start a Llama Stack server that runs the `openai` provider with
the `gpt-4o` and `gpt-4o-mini` models deployed. There's not a template
setup to do this out of the box, so I added a
`tests/verifications/openai-api-verification-run.yaml` to do this.
First, ensure you have the necessary API key environment variables set:
```
export TOGETHER_API_KEY="..."
export FIREWORKS_API_KEY="..."
export OPENAI_API_KEY="..."
```
Then, run a Llama Stack server that serves up all these providers:
```
llama stack run \
--image-type venv \
tests/verifications/openai-api-verification-run.yaml
```
Finally, generate a new verification report against all these providers,
both with and without the Llama Stack server in the middle.
```
python tests/verifications/generate_report.py \
--run-tests \
--provider \
together \
fireworks \
groq \
openai \
together-llama-stack \
fireworks-llama-stack \
groq-llama-stack \
openai-llama-stack
```
You'll see that most of the configurations with Llama Stack in the
middle now pass at 100%, even though some of them do not pass at 100%
when hitting the backend provider's API directly with an OpenAI client.
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with vLLM:
I also ran the smaller `test_openai_completion.py` test suite (that's
not yet merged with the verification tests) on multiple of the
providers, since I had to adjust the method signature of
openai_chat_completion a bit and thus had to touch lots of these
providers to match. Here's the tests I ran there, all passing:
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" llama stack build --template remote-vllm --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct"
```
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with ollama
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" llama stack build --template ollama --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0"
```
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with together.ai
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-Turbo" llama stack build --template together --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-Turbo" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-Turbo"
```
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with fireworks.ai
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct" llama stack build --template fireworks --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct"
---------
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This PR adds two methods to the Inference API:
- `batch_completion`
- `batch_chat_completion`
The motivation is for evaluations targeting a local inference engine
(like meta-reference or vllm) where batch APIs provide for a substantial
amount of acceleration.
Why did I not add this to `Api.batch_inference` though? That just
resulted in a _lot_ more book-keeping given the structure of Llama
Stack. Had I done that, I would have needed to create a notion of a
"batch model" resource, setup routing based on that, etc. This does not
sound ideal.
So what's the future of the batch inference API? I am not sure. Maybe we
can keep it for true _asynchronous_ execution. So you can submit
requests, and it can return a Job instance, etc.
## Test Plan
Run meta-reference-gpu using:
```bash
export INFERENCE_MODEL=meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct
export INFERENCE_CHECKPOINT_DIR=../checkpoints/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct-20250331210000
export MODEL_PARALLEL_SIZE=4
export MAX_BATCH_SIZE=32
export MAX_SEQ_LEN=6144
LLAMA_MODELS_DEBUG=1 llama stack run meta-reference-gpu
```
Then run the batch inference test case.
# What does this PR do?
This stubs in some OpenAI server-side compatibility with three new
endpoints:
/v1/openai/v1/models
/v1/openai/v1/completions
/v1/openai/v1/chat/completions
This gives common inference apps using OpenAI clients the ability to
talk to Llama Stack using an endpoint like
http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1 .
The two "v1" instances in there isn't awesome, but the thinking is that
Llama Stack's API is v1 and then our OpenAI compatibility layer is
compatible with OpenAI V1. And, some OpenAI clients implicitly assume
the URL ends with "v1", so this gives maximum compatibility.
The openai models endpoint is implemented in the routing layer, and just
returns all the models Llama Stack knows about.
The following providers should be working with the new OpenAI
completions and chat/completions API:
* remote::anthropic (untested)
* remote::cerebras-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::fireworks (tested)
* remote::fireworks-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::gemini (untested)
* remote::groq-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::nvidia (tested)
* remote::ollama (tested)
* remote::openai (untested)
* remote::passthrough (untested)
* remote::sambanova-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::together (tested)
* remote::together-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::vllm (tested)
The goal to support this for every inference provider - proxying
directly to the provider's OpenAI endpoint for OpenAI-compatible
providers. For providers that don't have an OpenAI-compatible API, we'll
add a mixin to translate incoming OpenAI requests to Llama Stack
inference requests and translate the Llama Stack inference responses to
OpenAI responses.
This is related to #1817 but is a bit larger in scope than just chat
completions, as I have real use-cases that need the older completions
API as well.
## Test Plan
### vLLM
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" llama stack build --template remote-vllm --image-type venv --run
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct"
```
### ollama
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" llama stack build --template ollama --image-type venv --run
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0"
```
## Documentation
Run a Llama Stack distribution that uses one of the providers mentioned
in the list above. Then, use your favorite OpenAI client to send
completion or chat completion requests with the base_url set to
http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1 . Replace "localhost:8321" with the
host and port of your Llama Stack server, if different.
---------
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
Move around bits. This makes the copies from llama-models _much_ easier
to maintain and ensures we don't entangle meta-reference specific
tidbits into llama-models code even by accident.
Also, kills the meta-reference-quantized-gpu distro and rolls
quantization deps into meta-reference-gpu.
## Test Plan
```
LLAMA_MODELS_DEBUG=1 \
with-proxy llama stack run meta-reference-gpu \
--env INFERENCE_MODEL=meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct \
--env INFERENCE_CHECKPOINT_DIR=<DIR> \
--env MODEL_PARALLEL_SIZE=4 \
--env QUANTIZATION_TYPE=fp8_mixed
```
Start a server with and without quantization. Point integration tests to
it using:
```
pytest -s -v tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--stack-config http://localhost:8321 --text-model meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct
```
Running full Tool Calling required some updates to work e2e.
- Remove `python_start` and `python_end` tags
- Tool Call messages and Tool Resposne messages should end with
`<|eom|>`
- System prompt needed updates
```
You are a helpful assisant who can can answer general questions or invoke tools when necessary.
In addition to tool calls, you should also augment your responses by using the tool outputs.
```
### Test Plan
- Start server with meta-reference
```
LLAMA_STACK_DISABLE_VERSION_CHECK=1 LLAMA_MODELS_DEBUG=1 INFERENCE_MODEL=meta-llama/$MODEL llama stack run meta-reference-gpu
```
- Added **NEW** tests with 5 test cases for multi-turn tool calls
```
pytest -s -v --stack-config http://localhost:8321 tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py --text-model meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct
```
- Also verified all vision and agent tests pass
# What does this PR do?
- **chore: mypy for strong_typing**
- **chore: mypy for remote::vllm**
- **chore: mypy for remote::ollama**
- **chore: mypy for providers.datatype**
---------
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
### What does this PR do?
Currently, `ToolCall.arguments` is a `Dict[str, RecursiveType]`.
However, on the client SDK side -- the `RecursiveType` gets deserialized
into a number ( both int and float get collapsed ) and hence when params
are `int` they get converted to float which might break client side
tools that might be doing type checking.
Closes: https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/1683
### Test Plan
Stainless changes --
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-client-python/pull/204
```
pytest -s -v --stack-config=fireworks tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --text-model meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
```
# What does this PR do?
It's a dict that may contain different types, as per
resolver:instantiate_provider implementation. (AFAIU it also never
contains ProviderSpecs, but *instances* of provider implementations.)
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
mypy passing if enabled checks for these modules. (See #1543)
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
This PR updates the inline vLLM inference provider in several
significant ways:
* Models are now attached at run time to instances of the provider via
the `.../models` API instead of hard-coding the model's full name into
the provider's YAML configuration.
* The provider supports models that are not Meta Llama models. Any model
that vLLM supports can be loaded by passing Huggingface coordinates in
the "provider_model_id" field. Custom fine-tuned versions of Meta Llama
models can be loaded by specifying a path on local disk in the
"provider_model_id".
* To implement full chat completions support, including tool calling and
constrained decoding, the provider now routes the `chat_completions` API
to a captive (i.e. called directly in-process, not via HTTPS) instance
of vLLM's OpenAI-compatible server .
* The `logprobs` parameter and completions API are also working.
## Test Plan
Existing tests in
`llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py` have good
coverage of the new functionality. These tests can be invoked as
follows:
```
cd llama-stack && pytest \
-vvv \
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--providers inference=vllm \
--inference-model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct
====================================== test session starts ======================================
platform linux -- Python 3.12.8, pytest-8.3.4, pluggy-1.5.0 -- /mnt/datadisk1/freiss/llama/env/bin/python3.12
cachedir: .pytest_cache
metadata: {'Python': '3.12.8', 'Platform': 'Linux-6.8.0-1016-ibm-x86_64-with-glibc2.39', 'Packages': {'pytest': '8.3.4', 'pluggy': '1.5.0'}, 'Plugins': {'anyio': '4.8.0', 'html': '4.1.1', 'metadata': '3.1.1', 'asyncio': '0.25.2'}, 'JAVA_HOME': '/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64'}
rootdir: /mnt/datadisk1/freiss/llama/llama-stack
configfile: pyproject.toml
plugins: anyio-4.8.0, html-4.1.1, metadata-3.1.1, asyncio-0.25.2
asyncio: mode=Mode.STRICT, asyncio_default_fixture_loop_scope=None
collected 9 items
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_model_list[-vllm] PASSED [ 11%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_completion[-vllm] PASSED [ 22%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_completion_logprobs[-vllm] PASSED [ 33%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_completion_structured_output[-vllm] PASSED [ 44%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_non_streaming[-vllm] PASSED [ 55%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_structured_output[-vllm] PASSED [ 66%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_streaming[-vllm] PASSED [ 77%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_with_tool_calling[-vllm] PASSED [ 88%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_with_tool_calling_streaming[-vllm] PASSED [100%]
=========================== 9 passed, 13 warnings in 97.18s (0:01:37) ===========================
```
## Sources
## Before submitting
- [X] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [X] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
The commit addresses the Ruff warning B008 by refactoring the code to
avoid calling SamplingParams() directly in function argument defaults.
Instead, it either uses Field(default_factory=SamplingParams) for
Pydantic models or sets the default to None and instantiates
SamplingParams inside the function body when the argument is None.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Now that remote-vllm include inline::sentence_transformers there is an
issue building the image:
Error building stack:
SentenceTransformersInferenceConfig.sample_run_config() got an
unexpected keyword argument '__distro_dir__'
To avoid that issue this fix extends the sample_run_config to accept
extra kwargs
# What does this PR do?
- Fixed type hinting and missing imports across multiple modules.
- Improved compatibility by using `TYPE_CHECKING` for conditional
imports.
- Updated `pyproject.toml` to enforce stricter linting.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
See Issue #922
The change is slightly backwards incompatible but no callsite (in our
client codebases or stack-apps) every passes a depth-2
`List[List[InterleavedContentItem]]` (which is now disallowed.)
## Test Plan
```bash
$ cd llama_stack/providers/tests/inference
$ pytest -s -v -k fireworks test_embeddings.py \
--inference-model nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5 --env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=784
$ pytest -s -v -k together test_embeddings.py \
--inference-model togethercomputer/m2-bert-80M-8k-retrieval --env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=784
$ pytest -s -v -k ollama test_embeddings.py \
--inference-model all-minilm:latest --env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=784
```
Also ran `tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embeddings.py`
There should be a choke-point for llama3.api imports -- this is the
prompt adapter. Creating a ChatFormat() object on demand is inexpensive.
The underlying Tokenizer is a singleton anyway.
llama-models should have extremely minimal cruft. Its sole purpose
should be didactic -- show the simplest implementation of the llama
models and document the prompt formats, etc.
This PR is the complement to
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/pull/279
## Test Plan
Ensure all `llama` CLI `model` sub-commands work:
```bash
llama model list
llama model download --model-id ...
llama model prompt-format -m ...
```
Ran tests:
```bash
cd tests/client-sdk
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v inference/
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v vector_io/
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v agents/
```
Create a fresh venv `uv venv && source .venv/bin/activate` and run
`llama stack build --template fireworks --image-type venv` followed by
`llama stack run together --image-type venv` <-- the server runs
Also checked that the OpenAPI generator can run and there is no change
in the generated files as a result.
```bash
cd docs/openapi_generator
sh run_openapi_generator.sh
```
# What does this PR do?
- Configured ruff linter to automatically fix import sorting issues.
- Set --exit-non-zero-on-fix to ensure non-zero exit code when fixes are
applied.
- Enabled the 'I' selection to focus on import-related linting rules.
- Ran the linter, and formatted all codebase imports accordingly.
- Removed the black dep from the "dev" group since we use ruff
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
[//]: # (## Documentation)
[//]: # (- [ ] Added a Changelog entry if the change is significant)
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
The current default system prompt for llama3.2 tends to overindex on
tool calling and doesn't work well when the prompt does not require tool
calling.
This PR adds an option to override the default system prompt, and
organizes tool-related configs into a new config object.
- [ ] Addresses issue (#issue)
## Test Plan
python -m unittest
llama_stack.providers.tests.inference.test_prompt_adapter
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [ ] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with
[ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/937).
* #938
* __->__ #937
Lint check in main branch is failing. This fixes the lint check after we
moved to ruff in https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/921. We
need to move to a `ruff.toml` file as well as fixing and ignoring some
additional checks.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
This commit adds support for XPU and CPU devices into meta-reference
stack for text models. On creation stack automatically identifies which
device to use checking available accelerate capabilities in the
following order: CUDA, then XPU, finally CPU. This behaviour can be
overwritten with the `DEVICE` environment variable. In this case
explicitly specified device will be used.
Tested with:
```
torchrun pytest llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py -k meta_reference
```
Results:
* Tested on: system with single CUDA device, system with single XPU
device and on pure CPU system
* Results: all test pass except `test_completion_logprobs`
* `test_completion_logprobs` fails in the same way as on a baseline,
i.e. unrelated with this change: `AssertionError: Unexpected top_k=3`
Requires: https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/pull/233
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rogozhkin <dmitry.v.rogozhkin@intel.com>
Some small updates to the inference types to make them more standard
Specifically:
- image data is now located in a "image" subkey
- similarly tool call data is located in a "tool_call" subkey
The pattern followed is `dict(type="foo", foo=<...>)`
## What does this PR do?
So far `llama stack build` has always created a separate conda
environment for packaging the dependencies of a distribution. The main
reason to do so is isolation -- distributions are composed of providers
which can have a variety of potentially conflicting dependencies. That
said, this has created significant annoyance for new users since it is
not at all transparent. The fact that `llama stack run` is actually
running the code in some other conda is very surprising.
This PR tries to make things better.
- Both `llama stack build` and `llama stack run` now accept an
`--image-name` argument which represents the (conda, docker, virtualenv)
image you want to operate upon.
- For the default (conda) mode, the script checks if a current conda
environment exists. If one exists, it uses it.
- If `--image-name` is provided, that option is used. In this case, an
environment is created if needed.
- There is no automatic `llamastack-` prefixing of the environment names
done anymore.
## Test Plan
Start in a conda environment, run `llama stack build --template
fireworks`; verify that it successfully built into the current
environment and stored the build file at
`$CONDA_PREFIX/llamastack-build.yaml`. Run `llama stack run fireworks`
which started correctly in the current environment.
Ran the same build command outside of conda. It failed asking for
`--image-name`. Ran it with `llama stack build --template fireworks
--image-name foo`. This successfully created a conda environment called
`foo` and installed deps. Ran `llama stack run fireworks` outside conda
which failed. Activated a different conda, ran again, it failed saying
it did not find the `llamastack-build.yaml` file. Then used
`--image-name foo` option and it ran successfully.
# What does this PR do?
Cleans up how we provide sampling params. Earlier, strategy was an enum
and all params (top_p, temperature, top_k) across all strategies were
grouped. We now have a strategy union object with each strategy (greedy,
top_p, top_k) having its corresponding params.
Earlier,
```
class SamplingParams:
strategy: enum ()
top_p, temperature, top_k and other params
```
However, the `strategy` field was not being used in any providers making
it confusing to know the exact sampling behavior purely based on the
params since you could pass temperature, top_p, top_k and how the
provider would interpret those would not be clear.
Hence we introduced -- a union where the strategy and relevant params
are all clubbed together to avoid this confusion.
Have updated all providers, tests, notebooks, readme and otehr places
where sampling params was being used to use the new format.
## Test Plan
`pytest llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/groq/test_groq_utils.py`
// inference on ollama, fireworks and together
`with-proxy pytest -v -s -k "ollama"
--inference-model="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct"
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py `
// agents on fireworks
`pytest -v -s -k 'fireworks and create_agent'
--inference-model="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct"
llama_stack/providers/tests/agents/test_agents.py
--safety-shield="meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B"`
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [X] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [X] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [X] Updated relevant documentation.
- [X] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hardik Shah <hjshah@fb.com>
# What does this PR do?
This PR adds the inline vLLM inference provider to the regression tests
for inference providers. The PR also fixes some regressions in that
inference provider in order to make the tests pass.
## Test Plan
Command to run the new tests (from root of project):
```
pytest \
-vvv \
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--providers inference=vllm \
--inference-model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct \
```
Output of the above command after these changes:
```
/mnt/datadisk1/freiss/llama/env/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pytest_asyncio/plugin.py:207: PytestDeprecationWarning: The configuration option "asyncio_default_fixture_loop_scope" is unset.
The event loop scope for asynchronous fixtures will default to the fixture caching scope. Future versions of pytest-asyncio will default the loop scope for asynchronous fixtures to function scope. Set the default fixture loop scope explicitly in order to avoid unexpected behavior in the future. Valid fixture loop scopes are: "function", "class", "module", "package", "session"
warnings.warn(PytestDeprecationWarning(_DEFAULT_FIXTURE_LOOP_SCOPE_UNSET))
=================================================================== test session starts ===================================================================
platform linux -- Python 3.12.7, pytest-8.3.4, pluggy-1.5.0 -- /mnt/datadisk1/freiss/llama/env/bin/python3.12
cachedir: .pytest_cache
rootdir: /mnt/datadisk1/freiss/llama/llama-stack
configfile: pyproject.toml
plugins: asyncio-0.25.0, anyio-4.6.2.post1
asyncio: mode=Mode.STRICT, asyncio_default_fixture_loop_scope=None
collected 9 items
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_model_list[-vllm] PASSED [ 11%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_completion[-vllm] SKIPPED (Other inference providers don't
support completion() yet) [ 22%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_completion_logprobs[-vllm] SKIPPED (Other inference providers
don't support completion() yet) [ 33%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_completion_structured_output[-vllm] SKIPPED (This test is not
quite robust) [ 44%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_non_streaming[-vllm] PASSED [ 55%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_structured_output[-vllm] SKIPPED (Other inference providers don't
support structured output yet) [ 66%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_streaming[-vllm] PASSED [ 77%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_with_tool_calling[-vllm] PASSED [ 88%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_with_tool_calling_streaming[-vllm] PASSED [100%]
======================================================== 5 passed, 4 skipped, 2 warnings in 25.56s ========================================================
Task was destroyed but it is pending!
task: <Task pending name='Task-6' coro=<AsyncLLMEngine.run_engine_loop() running at /mnt/datadisk1/freiss/llama/env/lib/python3.12/site-packages/vllm/engine/async_llm_engine.py:848> cb=[_log_task_completion(error_callback=<bound method...7cfc479440b0>>)() at /mnt/datadisk1/freiss/llama/env/lib/python3.12/site-packages/vllm/engine/async_llm_engine.py:45, shield.<locals>._inner_done_callback() at /mnt/datadisk1/freiss/llama/env/lib/python3.12/asyncio/tasks.py:905]>
[rank0]:[W1219 11:38:34.689424319 ProcessGroupNCCL.cpp:1250] Warning: WARNING: process group has NOT been destroyed before we destruct ProcessGroupNCCL. On normal program exit, the application should call destroy_process_group to ensure that any pending NCCL operations have finished in this process. In rare cases this process can exit before this point and block the progress of another member of the process group. This constraint has always been present, but this warning has only been added since PyTorch 2.4 (function operator())
```
The warning about "asyncio_default_fixture_loop_scope" appears to be due
to my environment having a newer version of pytest-asyncio.
The warning about a pending task appears to be due to a bug in
`vllm.AsyncLLMEngine.shutdown_background_loop()`. It looks like that
method returns without stopping a pending task. I will look into that
issue separately.
## Sources
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [X] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [X] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [X] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
