Summary:
- [new] Agent concepts (session, turn)
- [new] how to write custom tools
- [new] non-streaming API and how to get outputs
- [update] remaining `memory` -> `rag` rename
- [new] note importance of `instructions`
Test Plan:
read
# What does this PR do?
This PR improves the documentation in several ways:
- **Fixed incorrect link in `tools.md`** to ensure all references point
to the correct resources.
- **Added instructions for running the `code-interpreter` agent in a
Podman container**, helping users configure and execute the tool in
containerized environments.
- **Introduced an unregister command for single and multiple vector
databases**, making it easier to manage vector DBs.
- **Provided a simple example script for using the `code-interpreter`
agent**, giving users a practical reference for implementation.
These updates enhance the clarity, usability, and completeness of the
documentation.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
The following steps were performed to verify the accuracy of the
changes:
1. **Validated all fixed link** by checking their destinations to ensure
correctness.
2. **Ran the `code-interpreter` agent in a Podman container** following
the new instructions to confirm functionality.
3. **Executed the vector database unregister commands** and verified
that both single and multiple databases were correctly removed.
4. **Tested the new example script for `code-interpreter`**, ensuring it
runs without errors.
All changes were reviewed and tested successfully, improving the
documentation's accuracy and ease of use.
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
- Update `/eval-tasks` to `/benchmarks`
- ⚠️ Remove differentiation between `app` v.s. `benchmark` eval task
config. Now we only have `BenchmarkConfig`. The overloaded `benchmark`
is confusing and do not add any value. Backward compatibility is being
kept as the "type" is not being used anywhere.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
- This change is backward compatible
- Run notebook test with
```
pytest -v -s --nbval-lax ./docs/getting_started.ipynb
pytest -v -s --nbval-lax ./docs/notebooks/Llama_Stack_Benchmark_Evals.ipynb
```
<img width="846" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d2fc06a7-593a-444f-bc1f-10ab9b0c843d"
/>
[//]: # (## Documentation)
[//]: # (- [ ] Added a Changelog entry if the change is significant)
---------
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: reidliu <reid201711@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Browning <ben324@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Reid <61492567+reidliu41@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: reidliu <reid201711@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
Fix link
## Test Plan
<!--
Please describe:
- tests you ran to verify your changes with result summaries.
- provide instructions so it can be reproduced.
-->
<!--
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
-->
<!--
## Documentation
- [ ] Added a
[Changelog](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
entry if the change is significant (new feature, breaking change etc.).
-->
Lint check in main branch is failing. This fixes the lint check after we
moved to ruff in https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/921. We
need to move to a `ruff.toml` file as well as fixing and ignoring some
additional checks.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
In short, provide a summary of what this PR does and why. Usually, the
relevant context should be present in a linked issue.
- [ ] Addresses issue (#issue)
## Test Plan
Please describe:
- tests you ran to verify your changes with result summaries.
- provide instructions so it can be reproduced.
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
## Before submitting
- [x] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [ ] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
# What does this PR do?
Cleans up how we provide sampling params. Earlier, strategy was an enum
and all params (top_p, temperature, top_k) across all strategies were
grouped. We now have a strategy union object with each strategy (greedy,
top_p, top_k) having its corresponding params.
Earlier,
```
class SamplingParams:
strategy: enum ()
top_p, temperature, top_k and other params
```
However, the `strategy` field was not being used in any providers making
it confusing to know the exact sampling behavior purely based on the
params since you could pass temperature, top_p, top_k and how the
provider would interpret those would not be clear.
Hence we introduced -- a union where the strategy and relevant params
are all clubbed together to avoid this confusion.
Have updated all providers, tests, notebooks, readme and otehr places
where sampling params was being used to use the new format.
## Test Plan
`pytest llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/groq/test_groq_utils.py`
// inference on ollama, fireworks and together
`with-proxy pytest -v -s -k "ollama"
--inference-model="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct"
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py `
// agents on fireworks
`pytest -v -s -k 'fireworks and create_agent'
--inference-model="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct"
llama_stack/providers/tests/agents/test_agents.py
--safety-shield="meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B"`
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [X] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [X] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [X] Updated relevant documentation.
- [X] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hardik Shah <hjshah@fb.com>
We cannot use recursive types because not only does our OpenAPI
generator not like them, even if it did, it is not easy for all client
languages to automatically construct proper APIs (especially considering
garbage collection) around them. For now, we can return a `Dict[str,
SpanWithStatus]` instead of `SpanWithChildren` and rely on the client to
reconstruct the tree.
Also fixed a super subtle issue with the OpenAPI generation process
(monkey-patching of json_schema_type wasn't working because of import
reordering.)
# What does this PR do?
- A follow-up for #572
- The command in the original PR did not run
- Remove `--set` command unnecessary since Jaeger 2.1.0
## Test Plan
```
$ docker run --rm --name jaeger \
-p 16686:16686 -p 4318:4318 \
jaegertracing/jaeger:2.1.0
2024/12/07 19:07:13 application version: git-commit=65cff3c30823ea20d3dc48bae39d5685ae307da5, git-version=v2.1.0, build-date=2024-12-06T21:17:15Z
...
```
## Before submitting
- [x] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [x] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [x] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
Signed-off-by: Yuri Shkuro <github@ysh.us>
