# What does this PR do?
Move to use vector_stores.search for file search tool in Responses,
which supports filters.
closes#2435
## Test Plan
Added e2e test with fitlers.
myenv ❯ llama stack run llama_stack/templates/fireworks/run.yaml
pytest -sv tests/verifications/openai_api/test_responses.py \
-k 'file_search and filters' \
--base-url=http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1 \
--model=meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
# What does this PR do?
<!-- Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to
relevant issues if applicable. -->
To add health check for faiss inline vector_io provider.
I tried adding `async def health(self) -> HealthResponse:` like in
inference provider, but it didn't worked for `inline->vector_io->faiss`
provider. And via debug logs, I understood the critical issue, that the
health responses are being stored with the API name as the key, not as a
nested dictionary with provider IDs. This means that all providers of
the same API type (e.g., "vector_io") will share the same health
response, and only the last one processed will be visible in the API
response.
I've created a patch file that fixes this issue by:
- Storing the original get_providers_health method
- Creating a patched version that correctly maps health responses to
providers
- Applying the patch to the `ProviderImpl` class
Not an expert, so please let me know, if there can be any other
workaround using which I can get the health status updated directly from
`faiss.py`.
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
Added unit tests to test the provider patch implementation in the PR.
Adding a screenshot with the FAISS inline vector_io health status as
"OK"
When trying to `list` vector_stores , if we cannot retrieve one, log an
error and return all the ones that are valid.
### Test Plan
```
pytest -sv --stack-config=http://localhost:8321 tests/integration/vector_io/test_openai_vector_stores.py --embedding-model all-MiniLM-L6-v2
```
Also tested for `--stack-config fireworks`
…path
# What does this PR do?
Closes#1847
Changes:
- llama_stack/apis/common/responses.py: adds optional `url` field to
PaginatedResponse
- llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py: automatically populate the
URL field with route path
## Test Plan
- Built and ran llama stack server using the following cmds:
```bash
export INFERENCE_MODEL=llama3.1:8b
llama stack build --run --template ollama --image-type container
llama stack run llama_stack/templates/ollama/run.yaml
```
- Ran `curl` to test if we are seeing the `url` param in response:
```bash
curl -X 'GET' \
'http://localhost:8321/v1/agents' \
-H 'accept: application/json'
```
- Expected and Received Output:
`{"data":[],"has_more":false,"url":"/v1/agents"}`
---------
Co-authored-by: Rohan Awhad <rawhad@redhat.com>
For code completion apps need "fill in the middle" capabilities.
Added option of `suffix` to `openai_completion` to enable this.
Updated ollama provider to showcase the same.
### Test Plan
```
pytest -sv --stack-config="inference=ollama" tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model qwen2.5-coder:1.5b -k test_openai_completion_non_streaming_suffix
```
### OpenAI Sample script
```
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1")
response = client.completions.create(
model="qwen2.5-coder:1.5b",
prompt="The capital of ",
suffix="is Paris.",
max_tokens=10,
)
print(response.choices[0].text)
```
### Output
```
France is ____.
To answer this question, we
```
# What does this PR do?
This is an initial working prototype of wiring up the `file_search`
builtin tool for the Responses API to our existing rag knowledge search
tool.
This is me seeing what I could pull together on top of the bits we
already have merged. This may not be the ideal way to implement this,
and things like how I shuffle the vector store ids from the original
response API tool request to the actual tool execution feel a bit hacky
(grep for `tool_kwargs["vector_db_ids"]` in `_execute_tool_call` to see
what I mean).
## Test Plan
I stubbed in some new tests to exercise this using text and pdf
documents.
Note that this is currently under tests/verification only because it
sometimes flakes with tool calling of the small Llama-3.2-3B model we
run in CI (and that I use as an example below). We'd want to make the
test a bit more robust in some way if we moved this over to
tests/integration and ran it in CI.
### OpenAI SaaS (to verify test correctness)
```
pytest -sv tests/verifications/openai_api/test_responses.py \
-k 'file_search' \
--base-url=https://api.openai.com/v1 \
--model=gpt-4o
```
### Fireworks with faiss vector store
```
llama stack run llama_stack/templates/fireworks/run.yaml
pytest -sv tests/verifications/openai_api/test_responses.py \
-k 'file_search' \
--base-url=http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1 \
--model=meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
```
### Ollama with faiss vector store
This sometimes flakes on Ollama because the quantized small model
doesn't always choose to call the tool to answer the user's question.
But, it often works.
```
ollama run llama3.2:3b
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
llama stack run ./llama_stack/templates/ollama/run.yaml \
--image-type venv \
--env OLLAMA_URL="http://0.0.0.0:11434"
pytest -sv tests/verifications/openai_api/test_responses.py \
-k'file_search' \
--base-url=http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1 \
--model=meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct
```
### OpenAI provider with sqlite-vec vector store
```
llama stack run ./llama_stack/templates/starter/run.yaml --image-type venv
pytest -sv tests/verifications/openai_api/test_responses.py \
-k 'file_search' \
--base-url=http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1 \
--model=openai/gpt-4o-mini
```
### Ensure existing vector store integration tests still pass
```
ollama run llama3.2:3b
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
llama stack run ./llama_stack/templates/ollama/run.yaml \
--image-type venv \
--env OLLAMA_URL="http://0.0.0.0:11434"
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 \
pytest -sv tests/integration/vector_io \
--text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
--embedding-model=all-MiniLM-L6-v2
```
---------
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
Though the jwks endpoint does not usually require authentication, it
does in a kubernetes cluster. While the cluster can be configured to
allow anonymous access to that endpoint, this avoids the need to do so.
Updated the `search` functionality return response to match openai.
## Test Plan
```
pytest -sv --stack-config=http://localhost:8321 tests/integration/vector_io/test_openai_vector_stores.py --embedding-model all-MiniLM-L6-v2
```
# What does this PR do?
The test wasn't using the correct virtual environment. Also augment the
console width for logs.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Extracts common OpenAI vector-store code into its own mixin so that all
providers can share the same core logic.
This also makes it easy for Llama Stack to support both vector-stores
and Llama Stack APIs in the interim so that both share the same
underlying vector-dbs.
Each provider contains storage specific logic to `create / edit / delete
/ list` vector dbs while the plumbing logic is standardized in the
common code.
Ensured that this works well with both faiss and sqllite-vec.
### Test Plan
```
llama stack run starter
pytest -sv --stack-config http://localhost:8321 tests/integration/vector_io/test_openai_vector_stores.py --embedding-model all-MiniLM-L6-v2
```
Adding OpenAI compat `/v1/vector-store` apis.
This PR implements the `faiss` provider with followup PRs coming up for
other providers.
Added routes to create, update, delete, list vector stores.
Also added route to search a vector store
Inserting into vector stores is missing and will be a follow up diff.
### Test Plan
- Added new integration test for testing the faiss provider
```
pytest -sv --stack-config http://localhost:8321 tests/integration/vector_io/test_openai_vector_stores.py --embedding-model all-MiniLM-L6-v2
```
# What does this PR do?
<!-- Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to
relevant issues if applicable. -->
To add health status check for remote VLLM
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
PR includes the unit test to test the added health check implementation
feature.
The non-streaming version is just a small layer on top of the streaming
version - just pluck off the final `response.completed` event and return
that as the response!
This PR also includes a couple other changes which I ended up making
while working on it on a flight:
- changes to `ollama` so it does not pull embedding models
unconditionally
- a small fix to library client to make the stream and non-stream cases
a bit more symmetric
This PR fixes a runtime import error caused by missing OpenTelemetry
dependencies during `llama stack run`.
Specifically, the following imports fail if `opentelemetry-sdk` and
`opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http` are not present in the
environment:
```python
from opentelemetry import metrics, trace
from opentelemetry.exporter.otlp.proto.http.metric_exporter import OTLPMetricExporter
```
See
[llama\_stack/providers/inline/telemetry/meta\_reference/telemetry.py#L10-L19](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/llama_stack/providers/inline/telemetry/meta_reference/telemetry.py#L10-L19)
This PR resolves the issue by adding both packages to the
`SERVER_DEPENDENCIES` list:
```python
"opentelemetry-sdk",
"opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http",
```
### Reproduction Steps
```bash
llama stack build --config llama.yaml --image-type venv --image-name fun-with-lamas
llama stack run ~/.llama/distributions/fun-with-lamas/fun-with-lamas-run.yaml
```
Results in:
```
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'opentelemetry'
```
or
```
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'opentelemetry.exporter'
```
Signed-off-by: Jose Angel Morena <jmorenas@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: raghotham <rsm@meta.com>
This allows a set of rules to be defined for determining access to
resources. The rules are (loosely) based on the cedar policy format.
A rule defines a list of action either to permit or to forbid. It may
specify a principal or a resource that must match for the rule to take
effect. It may also specify a condition, either a 'when' or an 'unless',
with additional constraints as to where the rule applies.
A list of rules is held for each type to be protected and tried in order
to find a match. If a match is found, the request is permitted or
forbidden depening on the type of rule. If no match is found, the
request is denied. If no rules are specified for a given type, a rule
that allows any action as long as the resource attributes match the user
attributes is added (i.e. the previous behaviour is the default.
Some examples in yaml:
```
model:
- permit:
principal: user-1
actions: [create, read, delete]
comment: user-1 has full access to all models
- permit:
principal: user-2
actions: [read]
resource: model-1
comment: user-2 has read access to model-1 only
- permit:
actions: [read]
when:
user_in: resource.namespaces
comment: any user has read access to models with matching attributes
vector_db:
- forbid:
actions: [create, read, delete]
unless:
user_in: role::admin
comment: only user with admin role can use vector_db resources
```
---------
Signed-off-by: Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
TSIA
Added Files provider to the fireworks template. Might want to add to all
templates as a follow-up.
## Test Plan
llama-stack pytest tests/unit/files/test_files.py
llama-stack llama stack build --template fireworks --image-type conda
--run
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 pytest -s -v
tests/integration/files/
# What does this PR do?
[Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to relevant
issues if applicable.]
Removes the ability to run llama stack container images through the
llama stack CLI
Closes#2110
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
Run:
```
llama stack run /path/to/run.yaml --image-type container
```
Expected outcome:
```
llama stack run: error: argument --image-type: invalid choice: 'container' (choose from 'conda', 'venv')
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
Adds a new endpoint that is compatible with OpenAI for embeddings api.
`/openai/v1/embeddings`
Added providers for OpenAI, LiteLLM and SentenceTransformer.
## Test Plan
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 pytest -sv tests/integration/inference/test_openai_embeddings.py --embedding-model all-MiniLM-L6-v2,text-embedding-3-small,gemini/text-embedding-004
```
# What does this PR do?
Use a more common pattern and known terminology from the ecosystem,
where Route is more approved than Endpoint.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Two somewhat annoying fixes:
- we are going to index tools for non-MCP toolgroups always (like we
used to do). because there are just random assumptions in our tests,
etc. and I don't want to fix them right now
- we need to handle the funny case of toolgroups like
`builtin::rag/knowledge_search` where we added the tool name to use in
the toolgroup itself.
When registering a MCP endpoint, we cannot list tools (like we used to)
since the MCP endpoint may be behind an auth wall. Registration can
happen much sooner (via run.yaml).
Instead, we do listing only when the _user_ actually calls listing.
Furthermore, we cache the list in-memory in the server. Currently, the
cache is not invalidated -- we may want to periodically re-list for MCP
servers. Note that they must call `list_tools` before calling
`invoke_tool` -- we use this critically.
This will enable us to list MCP servers in run.yaml
## Test Plan
Existing tests, updated tests accordingly.
The most interesting MCP servers are those with an authorization wall in
front of them. This PR uses the existing `provider_data` mechanism of
passing provider API keys for passing MCP access tokens (in fact,
arbitrary headers in the style of the OpenAI Responses API) from the
client through to the MCP server.
```
class MCPProviderDataValidator(BaseModel):
# mcp_endpoint => list of headers to send
mcp_headers: dict[str, list[str]] | None = None
```
Note how we must stuff the headers for all MCP endpoints into a single
"MCPProviderDataValidator". Unlike existing providers (e.g., Together
and Fireworks for inference) where we could name the provider api keys
clearly (`together_api_key`, `fireworks_api_key`), we cannot name these
keys for MCP. We have a single generic MCP provider which can serve
multiple "toolgroups". So we use a dict to combine all the headers for
all MCP endpoints you may want to use in an agentic call.
## Test Plan
See the added integration test for usage.
# What does this PR do?
* Provide sqlite implementation of the APIs introduced in
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/2145.
* Introduced a SqlStore API: llama_stack/providers/utils/sqlstore/api.py
and the first Sqlite implementation
* Pagination support will be added in a future PR.
## Test Plan
Unit test on sql store:
<img width="1005" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9b8b7ec8-632b-4667-8127-5583426b2e29"
/>
Integration test:
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-fp16" llama stack build --template ollama --image-type conda --run
```
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:5001 INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-fp16" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "llama3.2:3b-instruct-fp16" -k 'inference_store and openai'
```
# What does this PR do?
We now only print the 'active' routes, not all the possible routes. This
is based on the distribution server config by looking at enabled APIs
and their respective providers.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
The cache_ttl config value is not in fact tied to the lifetime of any of
the keys, it represents the time interval between for our key cache
refresher.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
Kubernetes since 1.20 exposes a JWKS endpoint that we can use with our
recent oauth2 recent implementation.
The CI test has been kept intact for validation.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
feat(quota): add server‑side per‑client request quotas (requires auth)
Unrestricted usage can lead to runaway costs and fragmented client-side
workarounds. This commit introduces a native quota mechanism to the
server, giving operators a unified, centrally managed throttle for
per-client requests—without needing extra proxies or custom client
logic. This helps contain cloud-compute expenses, enables fine-grained
usage control, and simplifies deployment and monitoring of Llama Stack
services. Quotas are fully opt-in and have no effect unless explicitly
configured.
Notice that Quotas are fully opt-in and require authentication to be
enabled. The 'sqlite' is the only supported quota `type` at this time,
any other `type` will be rejected. And the only supported `period` is
'day'.
Highlights:
- Adds `QuotaMiddleware` to enforce per-client request quotas:
- Uses `Authorization: Bearer <client_id>` (from
AuthenticationMiddleware)
- Tracks usage via a SQLite-based KV store
- Returns 429 when the quota is exceeded
- Extends `ServerConfig` with a `quota` section (type + config)
- Enforces strict coupling: quotas require authentication or the server
will fail to start
Behavior changes:
- Quotas are disabled by default unless explicitly configured
- SQLite defaults to `./quotas.db` if no DB path is set
- The server requires authentication when quotas are enabled
To enable per-client request quotas in `run.yaml`, add:
```
server:
port: 8321
auth:
provider_type: "custom"
config:
endpoint: "https://auth.example.com/validate"
quota:
type: sqlite
config:
db_path: ./quotas.db
limit:
max_requests: 1000
period: day
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
Closes#2093
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Signed-off-by: Wen Liang <wenliang@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Wen Liang <wenliang@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This adds an alternative option to the oauth_token auth provider that
can be used with existing authorization services which support token
introspection as defined in RFC 7662. This could be useful where token
revocation needs to be handled or where opaque tokens (or other non jwt
formatted tokens) are used
## Test Plan
Tested against keycloak
Signed-off-by: Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This PR adds a lock to coordinate concurrent coroutines passing through
the jwt verification. As _refresh_jwks() was setting _jwks to an empty
dict then repopulating it, having multiple coroutines doing this
concurrently risks losing keys. The PR also builds the updated dict as a
separate object and assigns it to _jwks once completed. This avoids
impacting any coroutines using the key set as it is being updated.
Signed-off-by: Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This extracts the W3C trace context headers (traceparent and tracestate)
from incoming requests, stuffs them as attributes on the spans we
create, and uses them within the tracing provider implementation to
actually wrap our spans in the proper context.
What this means in practice is that when a client (such as an OpenAI
client) is instrumented to create these traces, we'll continue that
distributed trace within Llama Stack as opposed to creating our own root
span that breaks the distributed trace between client and server.
It's slightly awkward to do this in Llama Stack because our Tracing API
knows nothing about opentelemetry, W3C trace headers, etc - that's only
knowledge the specific provider implementation has. So, that's why the
trace headers get extracted by in the server code but not actually used
until the provider implementation to form the proper context.
This also centralizes how we were adding the `__root__` and
`__root_span__` attributes, as those two were being added in different
parts of the code instead of from a single place.
Closes#2097
## Test Plan
This was tested manually using the helpful scripts from #2097. I
verified that Llama Stack properly joined the client's span when the
client was instrumented for distributed tracing, and that Llama Stack
properly started its own root span when the incoming request was not
part of an existing trace.
Here's an example of the joined spans:
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
The `external_config_dir` configuration parameter is not being passed to
the `BuildConfig` for `LlamaStackAsLibraryClient`.
This prevents _plugin_ providers from being loaded when `llama-stack` is
uses as a library.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
I ran `LlamaStackAsLibraryClient` with a configuration file that
contained `external_config_dir` and related configuration.
It does not work without this change: _external_ providers are not
resolved.
It does work with this change 👍
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
This PR introduces APIs to retrieve past chat completion requests, which
will be used in the LS UI.
Our current `Telemetry` is ill-suited for this purpose as it's untyped
so we'd need to filter by obscure attribute names, making it brittle.
Since these APIs are 'provided by stack' and don't need to be
implemented by inference providers, we introduce a new InferenceProvider
class, containing the existing inference protocol, which is implemented
by inference providers.
The APIs are OpenAI-compliant, with an additional `input_messages`
field.
## Test Plan
This PR just adds the API and marks them provided_by_stack. S
tart stack server -> doesn't crash
This PR adds a notion of `principal` (aka some kind of persistent
identity) to the authentication infrastructure of the Stack. Until now
we only used access attributes ("claims" in the more standard OAuth /
OIDC setup) but we need the notion of a User fundamentally as well.
(Thanks @rhuss for bringing this up.)
This value is not yet _used_ anywhere downstream but will be used to
segregate access to resources.
In addition, the PR introduces a built-in JWT token validator so the
Stack does not need to contact an authentication provider to validating
the authorization and merely check the signed token for the represented
claims. Public keys are refreshed via the configured JWKS server. This
Auth Provider should overwhelmingly be considered the default given the
seamless integration it offers with OAuth setups.
# What does this PR do?
start_stack.sh was using --yaml-config which is deprecated.
a bunch of distro docs also mentioned --yaml-config. Replaces all
instances and logic for --yaml-config with --config
resolves#2189
Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
It may not always be desirable to listen on all interfaces, which is the
default. As an example, by listening instead only on a loopback
interface, the server cannot be reached except from within the host it
is run on. This PR makes this configurable, through a CLI option, an env
var or an entry on the config file.
## Test Plan
I ran a server with and without the added CLI argument to verify that
the argument is used if provided, but the default is as it was before if
not.
Signed-off-by: Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
currently the "default" dir for external providers is
`/etc/llama-stack/providers.d`
This dir is not used anywhere nor created.
Switch to a more friendly `~/.llama/providers.d/`
This allows external providers to actually create this dir and/or
populate it upon installation, `pip` cannot create directories in `etc`.
If a user does not specify a dir, default to this one
see https://github.com/containers/ramalama-stack/issues/36
Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This is a combination of what was previously 3 separate PRs - #2069,
#2075, and #2083. It turns out all 3 of those are needed to land a
working function calling Responses implementation. The web search
builtin tool was already working, but this wires in support for custom
function calling.
I ended up combining all three into one PR because they all had lots of
merge conflicts, both with each other but also with #1806 that just
landed. And, because landing any of them individually would have only
left a partially working implementation merged.
The new things added here are:
* Storing of input items from previous responses and restoring of those
input items when adding previous responses to the conversation state
* Handling of multiple input item messages roles, not just "user"
messages.
* Support for custom tools passed into the Responses API to enable
function calling outside of just the builtin websearch tool.
Closes#2074Closes#2080
## Test Plan
### Unit Tests
Several new unit tests were added, and they all pass. Ran via:
```
python -m pytest -s -v tests/unit/providers/agents/meta_reference/test_openai_responses.py
```
### Responses API Verification Tests
I ran our verification run.yaml against multiple providers to ensure we
were getting a decent pass rate. Specifically, I ensured the new custom
tool verification test passed across multiple providers and that the
multi-turn examples passed across at least some of the providers (some
providers struggle with the multi-turn workflows still).
Running the stack setup for verification testing:
```
llama stack run --image-type venv tests/verifications/openai-api-verification-run.yaml
```
Together, passing 100% as an example:
```
pytest -s -v 'tests/verifications/openai_api/test_responses.py' --provider=together-llama-stack
```
## Documentation
We will need to start documenting the OpenAI APIs, but for now the
Responses stuff is still rapidly evolving so delaying that.
---------
Signed-off-by: Derek Higgins <derekh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Derek Higgins <derekh@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
This adds a config option for a CA to be specified with which client
certs are verified. If specified client certs are required. This offers
a simple way of securing access to the server.
(Note: at present it is not possible to access the details of the client
certificate using uvicorn (unless it was monkey patched). Though there
is a defined TLS extension for ASGI, this is not implemented in uvicorn
pending a review and likely change to the specification. See
https://github.com/encode/uvicorn/pull/1119 and
https://github.com/django/asgiref/issues/466. Without access to the DN
it isn't possible to set user access attributes for a mutually
authentication tls connection, so more fine grained access control is
not yet possible).
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
Used proposed config option to specify a CA and verified that the server
can only be accessed with a valid client certificate.
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Signed-off-by: Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com>
