# What does this PR do?
closes#1584
This should be a rather innocuous change.
## Test Plan
Verify that there's no more tool call parsing error for example in issue
<img width="1216" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a5a6f4e8-2093-4ca2-bc06-794b707a0429"
/>
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v
tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield
meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B --text-model
meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
This PR introduces a way to implement Attribute Based Access Control
(ABAC) for the Llama Stack server.
The rough design is:
- https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1626 added a way for
the Llama Stack server to query an authenticator
- We build upon that and expect "access attributes" as part of the
response. These attributes indicate the scopes available for the
request.
- We use these attributes to perform access control for registered
resources as well as for constructing the default access control
policies for newly created resources.
- By default, if you support authentication but don't return access
attributes, we will add a unique namespace pointing to the API_KEY. That
way, all resources by default will be scoped to API_KEYs.
An important aspect of this design is that Llama Stack stays out of the
business of credential management or the CRUD for attributes. How you
manage your namespaces or projects is entirely up to you. The design
only implements access control checks for the metadata / book-keeping
information that the Stack tracks.
### Limitations
- Currently, read vs. write vs. admin permissions aren't made explicit,
but this can be easily extended by adding appropriate attributes to the
`AccessAttributes` data structure.
- This design does not apply to agent instances since they are not
considered resources the Stack knows about. Agent instances are
completely within the scope of the Agents API provider.
### Test Plan
Added unit tests, existing integration tests
# What does this PR do?
with the new /v1/providers API, /v1/inspect/providers is duplicative,
deprecate it by removing the route, and add a test for the full
/v1/providers API
resolves#1623
## Test Plan
`uv run pytest -v tests/integration/providers --stack-config=ollama
--text-model="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct"
--embedding-model=all-MiniLM-L6-v2`
<img width="1512" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-18 at 9 18 38 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2db30f25-3ff6-4374-b39d-0047f093fe36"
/>
Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
DocVQA asks model to look a a picture, then answer a question given in
text, with a text answer by text information in the picture. these
questions often require understanding of relative positions of texts
within the picture.
original dataset is defined in the "Task1" of
https://www.docvqa.org/datasets
## Test Plan
setup llama server with
```
llama stack run ./llama_stack/templates/open-benchmark/run.yaml
```
then send traffic:
```
llama-stack-client eval run-benchmark "meta-reference-docvqa" --model-id meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct --output-dir /tmp/gpqa --num-examples 200
```
# What does this PR do?
FAILED
tests/integration/tools/test_tools.py::test_toolsgroups_unregister[None]
- AttributeError: 'coroutine' object has no attribute 'data'
## Test Plan
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v
tests/integration/tools/test_tools.py
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with
[ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1704).
* #1705
* __->__ #1704
### What does this PR do?
Currently, `ToolCall.arguments` is a `Dict[str, RecursiveType]`.
However, on the client SDK side -- the `RecursiveType` gets deserialized
into a number ( both int and float get collapsed ) and hence when params
are `int` they get converted to float which might break client side
tools that might be doing type checking.
Closes: https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/1683
### Test Plan
Stainless changes --
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-client-python/pull/204
```
pytest -s -v --stack-config=fireworks tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --text-model meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
```
This PR adds support (or is a proposal for) for supporting API KEY
authentication on the Llama Stack server end. `llama-stack-client`
already supports accepting an api_key parameter and passes it down
through every request as an `Authentication: ` header.
Currently, Llama Stack does not propose APIs for handling authentication
or authorization for resources of any kind. Given that, and the fact
that any deployment will typically have _some_ authentication system
present, we simply adopt a delegation mechanism: delegate to an HTTPS
endpoint performing key management / authentication.
It is configured via:
```yaml
server:
auth:
endpoint: <...>
```
in the run.yaml configuration.
## How It Works
When authentication is enabled:
1. Every API request must include an `Authorization: Bearer <token>`
header
2. The server will send a _POST_ validation request to the configured
endpoint with the following payload:
```json
{
"api_key": "<token>",
"request": {
"path": "/api/path",
"headers": { "header1": "value1", ... },
"params": { "param1": "value1", ... }
}
}
```
3. If the authentication endpoint returns a 200 status code, the request
is allowed to proceed
4. If the authentication endpoint returns any other status code, a 401
Unauthorized response is returned
## Test Plan
Unit tests
# What does this PR do?
Removed local execution option from the remote Qdrant provider and
introduced an explicit inline provider for the embedded execution.
Updated the ollama template to include this option: this part can be
reverted in case we don't want to have two default `vector_io`
providers.
(Closes#1082)
## Test Plan
Build and run an ollama distro:
```bash
llama stack build --template ollama --image-type conda
llama stack run --image-type conda ollama
```
Run one of the sample ingestionapplicatinos like
[rag_with_vector_db.py](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-apps/blob/main/examples/agents/rag_with_vector_db.py),
but replace this line:
```py
selected_vector_provider = vector_providers[0]
```
with the following, to use the `qdrant` provider:
```py
selected_vector_provider = vector_providers[1]
```
After running the test code, verify the timestamp of the Qdrant store:
```bash
% ls -ltr ~/.llama/distributions/ollama/qdrant.db/collection/test_vector_db_*
total 784
-rw-r--r--@ 1 dmartino staff 401408 Feb 26 10:07 storage.sqlite
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
---------
Signed-off-by: Daniele Martinoli <dmartino@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Arceo <farceo@redhat.com>
# Summary:
Includes fixes to get test_agents working with openAI model, e.g. tool
parsing and message conversion
# Test Plan:
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=dev pytest -s -v tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B --text-model openai/gpt-4o-mini
```
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with
[ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1550).
* #1556
* __->__ #1550
# What does this PR do?
This avoids flaky timeout issue observed in CI builds, e.g.
3891286596
## Test Plan
Ran multiple times and pass consistently.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
quick fix as the vision_inference test dog.jpg path has been changed.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
currently the `inspect` API for providers is really a `list` API. Create
a new `providers` API which has a GET `providers/{provider_id}` inspect
API
which returns "user friendly" configuration to the end user. Also add a
GET `/providers` endpoint which returns the list of providers as
`inspect/providers` does today.
This API follows CRUD and is more intuitive/RESTful.
This work is part of the RFC at
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1359
sensitive fields are redacted using `redact_sensetive_fields` on the
server side before returning a response:
<img width="456" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-13 at 4 40 21 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9465c221-2a26-42f8-a08a-6ac4a9fecce8"
/>
## Test Plan
using https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-client-python/pull/181 a
user is able to to run the following:
`llama stack build --template ollama --image-type venv`
`llama stack run --image-type venv
~/.llama/distributions/ollama/ollama-run.yaml`
`llama-stack-client providers inspect ollama`
<img width="378" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-13 at 4 39 35 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8273d05d-8bc3-44c6-9e4b-ef95e48d5466"
/>
also, was able to run the new test_list integration test locally with
ollama:
<img width="1509" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-13 at 11 03 40 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9b9db166-f02f-45b0-86a4-306d85149bc8"
/>
Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com>
Summary:
This is not used anywhere.
closes#1421
Test Plan:
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v
tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield
meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B --text-model
meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct --record-responses
Summary:
1. adds option to not use bwrap for code execution
2. disable bwrap when running tests on macs
Test Plan:
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B --text-model meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
```
Verify code_interpreter result in logs
INFO 2025-03-11 08:10:39,858
llama_stack.providers.inline.agents.meta_reference.agent_instance:1032
agents: tool
call code_interpreter completed with result:
content='completed\n\n541\n' error_message=None error_code=None
metadata=None
# What does this PR do?
TTFT number largely depends on input length. Ideally we have a
"standard" test that we can use to measure against any llama stack
serving.
TODO: Once JSON is replaced with YAML, I will add "notes" for each test
to explain purpose of each test in place.
## Test plan
Please refer to e2e test doc for setup.
```
LLAMA_STACK_PORT=8322 pytest -v -s --stack-config="http://localhost:8322" \
--text-model="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_first_token_profiling
```
# What does this PR do?
[Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to relevant
issues if applicable.]
It should use `export` for env var for api key.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Signed-off-by: reidliu <reid201711@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: reidliu <reid201711@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
Add unit tests for the inspect endpoint.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
$ ollama run llama3.2:3b-instruct-fp16 --keepalive=60m &
$ LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=./llama_stack/templates/ollama/run.yaml uv run
pytest -v -s tests/integration/inspect/test_inspect.py
/Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pytest_asyncio/plugin.py:207:
PytestDeprecationWarning: The configuration option
"asyncio_default_fixture_loop_scope" is unset.
The event loop scope for asynchronous fixtures will default to the
fixture caching scope. Future versions of pytest-asyncio will default
the loop scope for asynchronous fixtures to function scope. Set the
default fixture loop scope explicitly in order to avoid unexpected
behavior in the future. Valid fixture loop scopes are: "function",
"class", "module", "package", "session"
warnings.warn(PytestDeprecationWarning(_DEFAULT_FIXTURE_LOOP_SCOPE_UNSET))
============================================== test session starts
==============================================
platform darwin -- Python 3.10.16, pytest-8.3.4, pluggy-1.5.0 --
/Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/.venv/bin/python3
cachedir: .pytest_cache
metadata: {'Python': '3.10.16', 'Platform':
'macOS-15.3.1-arm64-arm-64bit', 'Packages': {'pytest': '8.3.4',
'pluggy': '1.5.0'}, 'Plugins': {'html': '4.1.1', 'metadata': '3.1.1',
'asyncio': '0.25.3', 'anyio': '4.8.0', 'nbval': '0.11.0'}}
rootdir: /Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack
configfile: pyproject.toml
plugins: html-4.1.1, metadata-3.1.1, asyncio-0.25.3, anyio-4.8.0,
nbval-0.11.0
asyncio: mode=strict, asyncio_default_fixture_loop_scope=None
collected 2 items
tests/integration/inspect/test_inspect.py::TestInspect::test_health[txt=8B]
PASSED
tests/integration/inspect/test_inspect.py::TestInspect::test_version[txt=8B]
PASSED
========================================= 2 passed, 3 warnings in 2.26s
===================================
```
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
The test class by default enables debug mode, which produces some
unexpected warnings like:
```
tests/unit/models/test_prompt_adapter.py::PrepareMessagesTests::test_completion_message_encoding
WARNING 2025-03-10 20:41:48,577 asyncio:1904 uncategorized: Executing <Task pending name='Task-1'
coro=<IsolatedAsyncioTestCase._asyncioLoopRunner() running at
/home/ec2-user/.local/share/uv/python/cpython-3.10.16-linux-x86_64-gnu/lib/python3.10/unittest/async_case.py:95
> wait_for=<Future pending cb=[Task.task_wakeup()] created at
/home/ec2-user/.local/share/uv/python/cpython-3.10.16-linux-x86_64-gnu/lib/python3.10/asyncio/base_events.py:42
9> created at
/home/ec2-user/.local/share/uv/python/cpython-3.10.16-linux-x86_64-gnu/lib/python3.10/unittest/async_case.py:11
7> took 0.231 seconds
PASSED
```
I suggest we disable these since they are not very useful and can
confuse other developers.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
Run tests. The warnings are no longer seen.
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
Concurrent requests should not trample (or reuse) each others' provider
data. Provider data should be scoped to each request.
## Test Plan
Set the uvicorn server to have a single worker process + thread by
updating the config:
```python
uvicorn_config = {
...
"workers": 1,
"loop": "asyncio",
}
```
Then perform the following steps on `origin/main` (without this change).
(1) Run the server using `llama stack run dev` without having
`FIREWORKS_API_KEY` in the environment.
(2) Run a test by specifying the FIREWORKS_API_KEY env var so it gets
stored in the thread local
```
pytest -s -v tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--stack-config http://localhost:8321 \
--text-model accounts/fireworks/models/llama-v3p1-8b-instruct \
-k test_text_chat_completion_with_tool_calling_and_streaming \
--env FIREWORKS_API_KEY=<...>
```
Ensure you don't have any other API keys in the environment (otherwise
the bug will not reproduce due to other specifics in our testing code.)
Verify this works.
(3) Run the same command again without specifying FIREWORKS_API_KEY. See
that the request actually succeeds when it *should have failed*.
----
Now do the same tests on this branch, verify step (3) results in
failure.
Finally, run the full `test_text_inference.py` test suite with this
change, verify it succeeds.
Summary:
CI writes files to /tmp
[{"__module__": "llama_stack.apis.inference.inference", "__pydantic__":
"SystemMessage", "data": {"content": "You are a helpful assistant",
"role": "system"}}, {"__module__":
"llama_stack.apis.inference.inference", "__pydantic__": "UserMessage",
"data": {"content": "Here is a csv file, can you describe it?",
"context": null, "role": "user"}}, {"__module__":
"llama_stack.apis.inference.inference", "__pydantic__":
"ToolResponseMessage", "data": {"call_id": "", "content": [{"text": "#
User provided a file accessible to you at
\\"/tmp/tmp7k7dg6qk/gcDtT5M8inflation.csv\\"\\nYou can use
code_interpreter to load and inspect it.", "type": "text"}], "role":
"tool", "tool_name": {"__enum__": "BuiltinTool", "__module__":
"llama_stack.models.llama.datatypes", "value": "code_interpreter"}}}]],
{"response_format": null, "sa
Test Plan:
# What does this PR do?
- fix scoring test
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -v tests/integration/scoring/test_scoring.py --text-model meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct --judge-model meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
```
<img width="1061" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/740f9e6e-a654-4265-9db1-61481515a852"
/>
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
This switches from an OpenAI client to the AsyncOpenAI client in the
remote vllm provider. The main benefit of this is that instead of each
client call being a blocking operation that was blocking our server
event loop, the client calls are now async operations that do not block
the event loop.
The actual fix is quite simple and straightforward. Creating a reliable
reproducer of this with a unit test that verifies we were blocking the
event loop before and are not blocking it any longer was a bit harder.
Some other inference providers have this same issue, so we may want to
make that simple delayed http server a bit more generic and pull it into
a common place as other inference providers get fixed.
(Closes#1457)
## Test Plan
I verified the unit tests and test_text_inference tests pass with this
change like below:
```
python -m pytest -v tests/unit
```
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" \
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=remote-vllm \
python -m pytest -v -s \
tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct"
```
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This commit introduces a new logging system that allows loggers to be
assigned
a category while retaining the logger name based on the file name. The
log
format includes both the logger name and the category, producing output
like:
```
INFO 2025-03-03 21:44:11,323 llama_stack.distribution.stack:103 [core]: Tool_groups: builtin::websearch served by
tavily-search
```
Key features include:
- Category-based logging: Loggers can be assigned a category (e.g.,
"core", "server") when programming. The logger can be loaded like
this: `logger = get_logger(name=__name__, category="server")`
- Environment variable control: Log levels can be configured
per-category using the
`LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING` environment variable. For example:
`LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING="server=DEBUG;core=debug"` enables DEBUG level for
the "server"
and "core" categories.
- `LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING="all=debug"` sets DEBUG level globally for all
categories and
third-party libraries.
This provides fine-grained control over logging levels while maintaining
a clean and
informative log format.
The formatter uses the rich library which provides nice colors better
stack traces like so:
```
ERROR 2025-03-03 21:49:37,124 asyncio:1758 [uncategorized]: unhandled exception during asyncio.run() shutdown
task: <Task finished name='Task-16' coro=<handle_signal.<locals>.shutdown() done, defined at
/Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py:146>
exception=UnboundLocalError("local variable 'loop' referenced before assignment")>
╭────────────────────────────────────── Traceback (most recent call last) ───────────────────────────────────────╮
│ /Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py:178 in shutdown │
│ │
│ 175 │ │ except asyncio.CancelledError: │
│ 176 │ │ │ pass │
│ 177 │ │ finally: │
│ ❱ 178 │ │ │ loop.stop() │
│ 179 │ │
│ 180 │ loop = asyncio.get_running_loop() │
│ 181 │ loop.create_task(shutdown()) │
╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'loop' referenced before assignment
```
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <@ashwinb>
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
```
python -m llama_stack.distribution.server.server --yaml-config ./llama_stack/templates/ollama/run.yaml
INFO 2025-03-03 21:55:35,918 __main__:365 [server]: Using config file: llama_stack/templates/ollama/run.yaml
INFO 2025-03-03 21:55:35,925 __main__:378 [server]: Run configuration:
INFO 2025-03-03 21:55:35,928 __main__:380 [server]: apis:
- agents
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
---------
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
Since we moved the move tests/client-sdk to tests/api in
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1376. The N999 rule is
not needed anymore. And furthermore in
abfbaf3c1b
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
- re-gen to fix agents test
- update test_custom_tool
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -v tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --text-model meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
```
<img width="1294" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/63521532-b989-4cf2-8fe5-c7f057f1c4dc"
/>
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# Summary:
removes the use of pickle
# Test Plan:
Run the following with `--record-responses` first, then another time
without.
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v
tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield
meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B --text-model
meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
You now run the integration tests with these options:
```bash
Custom options:
--stack-config=STACK_CONFIG
a 'pointer' to the stack. this can be either be:
(a) a template name like `fireworks`, or
(b) a path to a run.yaml file, or
(c) an adhoc config spec, e.g.
`inference=fireworks,safety=llama-guard,agents=meta-
reference`
--env=ENV Set environment variables, e.g. --env KEY=value
--text-model=TEXT_MODEL
comma-separated list of text models. Fixture name:
text_model_id
--vision-model=VISION_MODEL
comma-separated list of vision models. Fixture name:
vision_model_id
--embedding-model=EMBEDDING_MODEL
comma-separated list of embedding models. Fixture name:
embedding_model_id
--safety-shield=SAFETY_SHIELD
comma-separated list of safety shields. Fixture name:
shield_id
--judge-model=JUDGE_MODEL
comma-separated list of judge models. Fixture name:
judge_model_id
--embedding-dimension=EMBEDDING_DIMENSION
Output dimensionality of the embedding model to use for
testing. Default: 384
--record-responses Record new API responses instead of using cached ones.
--report=REPORT Path where the test report should be written, e.g.
--report=/path/to/report.md
```
Importantly, if you don't specify any of the models (text-model,
vision-model, etc.) the relevant tests will get **skipped!**
This will make running tests somewhat more annoying since all options
will need to be specified. We will make this easier by adding some easy
wrapper yaml configs.
## Test Plan
Example:
```bash
ashwin@ashwin-mbp ~/local/llama-stack/tests/integration (unify_tests) $
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v inference/test_text_inference.py \
--text-model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct
```
# Summary:
Client side change in
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-client-python/pull/180
Changes the resume_turn API to accept `ToolResponse` instead of
`ToolResponseMessage`:
1. `ToolResponse` contains `metadata`
2. `ToolResponseMessage` is a concept for model inputs. Here we are just
submitting the outputs of tool execution.
# Test Plan:
Ran integration tests with newly added test using client tool with
metadata
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v
tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield
meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B --record-responses
# What does this PR do?
When running `tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py` on
smaller models, such as Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct, I sometimes get test
flakes where the model passes "San Francisco" as an argument to my tool
call instead of "San Francisco, CA" which is what we expect.
So, this expands upon that tool calling parameter's description to
explicitly state that both city and state are required. With this
change, the tool calling tests that are checking for this "San
Francisco, CA" value are always passing for me instead of sometimes
failing.
## Test Plan
I test this locally via vLLM like:
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" \
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=remote-vllm \
python -m pytest -v \
tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--inference-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
--vision-inference-model ""
```
I don't expect this would negatively impact the parameter generated for
this tool call by other models, as we're providing additional guidance
but not removing any of the existing guidance. However, I cannot easily
confirm that myself.
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This gracefully handles the case where the vLLM server responded to a
completion request with no choices, which can happen in certain vLLM
error situations. Previously, we'd error out with a stack trace about a
list index out of range. Now, we just log a warning to the user and move
past any chunks with an empty choices list.
A specific example of the type of stack trace this fixes:
```
File "/app/llama-stack-source/llama_stack/providers/remote/inference/vllm/vllm.py", line 170, in _process_vllm_chat_completion_stream_response
choice = chunk.choices[0]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^
IndexError: list index out of range
```
Now, instead of erroring out with that stack trace, we log a warning
that vLLM failed to generate any completions and alert the user to check
the vLLM server logs for details.
This is related to #1277 and addresses the stack trace shown in that
issue, although does not in and of itself change the functional behavior
of vLLM tool calling.
## Test Plan
As part of this fix, I added new unit tests to trigger this same error
and verify it no longer happens. That is
`test_process_vllm_chat_completion_stream_response_no_choices` in the
new `tests/unit/providers/inference/test_remote_vllm.py`. I also added a
couple of more tests to trigger and verify the last couple of remote
vllm provider bug fixes - specifically a test for #1236 (builtin tool
calling) and #1325 (vLLM <= v0.6.3).
This required fixing the signature of
`_process_vllm_chat_completion_stream_response` to accept the actual
type of chunks it was getting passed - specifically changing from our
openai_compat `OpenAICompatCompletionResponse` to
`openai.types.chat.chat_completion_chunk.ChatCompletionChunk`. It was
not actually getting passed `OpenAICompatCompletionResponse` objects
before, and was using attributes that didn't exist on those objects. So,
the signature now matches the type of object it's actually passed.
Run these new unit tests like this:
```
pytest tests/unit/providers/inference/test_remote_vllm.py
```
Additionally, I ensured the existing `test_text_inference.py` tests
passed via:
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" \
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=remote-vllm \
python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--inference-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" \
--vision-inference-model ""
```
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
All of the tests from `llama_stack/providers/tests/` are now moved to
`tests/integration`.
I converted the `tools`, `scoring` and `datasetio` tests to use API.
However, `eval` and `post_training` proved to be a bit challenging to
leaving those. I think `post_training` should be relatively
straightforward also.
As part of this, I noticed that `wolfram_alpha` tool wasn't added to
some of our commonly used distros so I added it. I am going to remove a
lot of code duplication from distros next so while this looks like a
one-off right now, it will go away and be there uniformly for all
distros.
Summary:
Test Plan:
added new test
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v
tests/api/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield
meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B
