# What does this PR do?
- We cannot directly return a literal type
> Note: this is not final jobs API change
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
<img width="837" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/18a17561-35f9-443d-987d-54afdd6ff40c"
/>
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
Clean up mypy violations for inline::{telemetry,tool_runtime,vector_io}.
This also makes API accept a tool call result without any content (like
RAG tool already may produce).
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
with the new /v1/providers API, /v1/inspect/providers is duplicative,
deprecate it by removing the route, and add a test for the full
/v1/providers API
resolves#1623
## Test Plan
`uv run pytest -v tests/integration/providers --stack-config=ollama
--text-model="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct"
--embedding-model=all-MiniLM-L6-v2`
<img width="1512" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-18 at 9 18 38 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2db30f25-3ff6-4374-b39d-0047f093fe36"
/>
Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
In this PR, we added a new eval open benchmark IfEval based on paper
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07911 to measure the model capability of
instruction following.
## Test Plan
spin up a llama stack server with open-benchmark template
run `llama-stack-client --endpoint xxx eval run-benchmark
"meta-reference-ifeval" --model-id "meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct"
--output-dir "/home/markchen1015/" --num-examples 20` on client side and
get the eval aggregate results
# What does this PR do?
- To make it easier, delete existing `eval/scoring/scoring_function`
apis. There will be a bunch of broken impls here. The sequence is:
1. migrate benchmark graders
2. clean up existing scoring functions
- Add a skeleton evaluation impl to make tests pass.
## Test Plan
tested in following PRs
[//]: # (## Documentation)
### What does this PR do?
Currently, `ToolCall.arguments` is a `Dict[str, RecursiveType]`.
However, on the client SDK side -- the `RecursiveType` gets deserialized
into a number ( both int and float get collapsed ) and hence when params
are `int` they get converted to float which might break client side
tools that might be doing type checking.
Closes: https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/1683
### Test Plan
Stainless changes --
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-client-python/pull/204
```
pytest -s -v --stack-config=fireworks tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --text-model meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
```
# What does this PR do?
Fixes a bunch of violations.
Note: this patch touches all files but post_training.py that will be
significantly changed by #1437, hence leaving it out of the picture for
now.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
Testing with https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1543
Also checked that GPU training works with the change:
```
INFO: ::1:53316 - "POST /v1/post-training/supervised-fine-tune HTTP/1.1" 200 OK
INFO: ::1:53316 - "GET /v1/post-training/job/status?job_uuid=test-jobb5ca2d84-d541-42f8-883b-762828b4c0e7 HTTP/1.1" 200 OK
INFO: ::1:53316 - "GET /v1/post-training/job/artifacts?job_uuid=test-jobb5ca2d84-d541-42f8-883b-762828b4c0e7 HTTP/1.1" 200 OK
21:24:01.161 [END] /v1/post-training/supervised-fine-tune [StatusCode.OK] (32526.75ms)
21:23:28.769 [DEBUG] Setting manual seed to local seed 3918872849. Local seed is seed + rank = 3918872849 + 0
21:23:28.996 [INFO] Identified model_type = Llama3_2. Ignoring output.weight in checkpoint in favor of the tok_embedding.weight tied weights.
21:23:29.933 [INFO] Memory stats after model init:
GPU peak memory allocation: 6.05 GiB
GPU peak memory reserved: 6.10 GiB
GPU peak memory active: 6.05 GiB
21:23:29.934 [INFO] Model is initialized with precision torch.bfloat16.
21:23:30.115 [INFO] Tokenizer is initialized.
21:23:30.118 [INFO] Optimizer is initialized.
21:23:30.119 [INFO] Loss is initialized.
21:23:30.896 [INFO] Dataset and Sampler are initialized.
21:23:30.898 [INFO] Learning rate scheduler is initialized.
21:23:31.618 [INFO] Memory stats after model init:
GPU peak memory allocation: 6.24 GiB
GPU peak memory reserved: 6.30 GiB
GPU peak memory active: 6.24 GiB
21:23:31.620 [INFO] Starting checkpoint save...
21:23:59.428 [INFO] Model checkpoint of size 6.43 GB saved to /home/ec2-user/.llama/checkpoints/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-sft-0/consolidated.00.pth
21:23:59.445 [INFO] Adapter checkpoint of size 0.00 GB saved to /home/ec2-user/.llama/checkpoints/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-sft-0/adapter/adapter.pth
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
- Removed Optional return types for GET methods
- Raised ValueError when requested resource is not found
- Ensures proper 4xx response for missing resources
- Updated the API generator to check for wrong signatures
```
$ uv run --with ".[dev]" ./docs/openapi_generator/run_openapi_generator.sh
Validating API method return types...
API Method Return Type Validation Errors:
Method ScoringFunctions.get_scoring_function returns Optional type
```
Closes: https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/1630
## Test Plan
Run the server then:
```
curl http://127.0.0.1:8321/v1/models/foo
{"detail":"Invalid value: Model 'foo' not found"}%
```
Server log:
```
INFO: 127.0.0.1:52307 - "GET /v1/models/foo HTTP/1.1" 400 Bad Request
09:51:42.654 [END] /v1/models/foo [StatusCode.OK] (134.65ms)
09:51:42.651 [ERROR] Error executing endpoint route='/v1/models/{model_id:path}' method='get'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py", line 193, in endpoint
return await maybe_await(value)
File "/Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py", line 156, in maybe_await
return await value
File "/Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/llama_stack/providers/utils/telemetry/trace_protocol.py", line 102, in async_wrapper
result = await method(self, *args, **kwargs)
File "/Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/routers/routing_tables.py", line 217, in get_model
raise ValueError(f"Model '{model_id}' not found")
ValueError: Model 'foo' not found
```
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
- fix dataset registeration & iterrows
> NOTE: the URL endpoint is changed to datasetio due to flaky path
routing
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -v tests/integration/datasets/test_datasets.py
```
<img width="854" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0168b352-1c5a-48d1-8e9a-93141d418e54"
/>
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
- as title
- uses "cursor" pagination scheme for iterrows
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
<img width="1226" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3220eaac-7117-4d0a-b344-2bbb77a22065"
/>
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
currently the `inspect` API for providers is really a `list` API. Create
a new `providers` API which has a GET `providers/{provider_id}` inspect
API
which returns "user friendly" configuration to the end user. Also add a
GET `/providers` endpoint which returns the list of providers as
`inspect/providers` does today.
This API follows CRUD and is more intuitive/RESTful.
This work is part of the RFC at
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1359
sensitive fields are redacted using `redact_sensetive_fields` on the
server side before returning a response:
<img width="456" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-13 at 4 40 21 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9465c221-2a26-42f8-a08a-6ac4a9fecce8"
/>
## Test Plan
using https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-client-python/pull/181 a
user is able to to run the following:
`llama stack build --template ollama --image-type venv`
`llama stack run --image-type venv
~/.llama/distributions/ollama/ollama-run.yaml`
`llama-stack-client providers inspect ollama`
<img width="378" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-13 at 4 39 35 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8273d05d-8bc3-44c6-9e4b-ef95e48d5466"
/>
also, was able to run the new test_list integration test locally with
ollama:
<img width="1509" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-13 at 11 03 40 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9b9db166-f02f-45b0-86a4-306d85149bc8"
/>
Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com>
Summary:
This is not used anywhere.
closes#1421
Test Plan:
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v
tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield
meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B --text-model
meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct --record-responses
