The same code is used (inside providers/remote/memory/chroma/chroma.py)
but it is driven by separate configurations and changes which Chroma
client to use. Note that the dependencies are separate
(`chromadb-client` vs `chromadb` -- the latter is a _much_ heavier
package.)
```
pytest -s -v -m chroma memory/test_memory.py --env CHROMA_DB_PATH=/tmp/chroma_test
pytest -s -v -m chroma memory/test_memory.py --env CHROMA_URL=http://localhost:6001
```
# What does this PR do?
- remove model registration & parameterize model in scoring/eval pytests
## Test Plan
```
pytest -v -s -m meta_reference_eval_together_inference eval/test_eval.py
pytest -v -s -m meta_reference_eval_together_inference_huggingface_datasetio eval/test_eval.py
```
```
pytest -v -s -m llm_as_judge_scoring_together_inference scoring/test_scoring.py --judge-model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct
pytest -v -s -m basic_scoring_together_inference scoring/test_scoring.py
```
<img width="860" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d4b0badc-da34-4097-9b7c-9511f8261723"
/>
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [ ] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
# What does this PR do?
This PR adds a new model type field to support embedding models to be
registered. Summary of changes:
1) Each registered model by default is an llm model.
2) User can specify an embedding model type, while registering.If
specified, the model bypass the llama model checks since embedding
models can by of any type and based on llama.
3) User needs to include the required embedding dimension in metadata.
This will be used by embedding generation to generate the requried size
of embeddings.
## Test Plan
This PR will go together will need to be merged with two follow up PRs
that will include test plans.
# What does this PR do?
add the completion api to the nvidia inference provider
## Test Plan
while running the meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct NIM from
https://build.nvidia.com/meta/llama-3_1-8b-instruct?snippet_tab=Docker
```
➜ pytest -s -v --providers inference=nvidia llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/ --env NVIDIA_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8000 -k test_completion --inference-model Llama3.1-8B-Instruct
=============================================== test session starts ===============================================
platform linux -- Python 3.10.15, pytest-8.3.3, pluggy-1.5.0 -- /home/matt/.conda/envs/stack/bin/python
cachedir: .pytest_cache
rootdir: /home/matt/Documents/Repositories/meta-llama/llama-stack
configfile: pyproject.toml
plugins: anyio-4.6.2.post1, asyncio-0.24.0, httpx-0.34.0
asyncio: mode=strict, default_loop_scope=None
collected 20 items / 18 deselected / 2 selected
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_completion[-nvidia] PASSED
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_completion_structured_output[-nvidia] SKIPPED
============================= 1 passed, 1 skipped, 18 deselected, 6 warnings in 5.40s =============================
```
the structured output functionality works but the accuracy fails
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [x] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [x] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [x] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
# What does this PR do?
Addresses issue (#342)
- PDFs uploaded from url are being loaded into vector db as raw bytes
- Instead this PR extracts text from PDF if mime_type is
"application/json"
- Adds tests to cover new cases
## Test Plan
Ran these unit tests:
```bash
llama stack build --template meta-reference-gpu --image-type conda
conda activate llamastack-meta-reference-gpu
pip install pytest pytest-asyncio pypdf
pytest llama_stack/providers/tests/memory/test_vector_store.py -v
```
```
platform linux -- Python 3.10.15, pytest-8.3.3, pluggy-1.5.0 -- /home/ubuntu/1xa100-2/llama-stack/envs/bin/python
cachedir: .pytest_cache
rootdir: /home/ubuntu/1xa100-2/llama-stack
configfile: pyproject.toml
plugins: anyio-4.6.2.post1, asyncio-0.24.0, httpx-0.35.0
asyncio: mode=strict, default_loop_scope=None
collected 3 items
llama_stack/providers/tests/memory/test_vector_store.py::TestVectorStore::test_returns_content_from_pdf_data_uri PASSED [ 33%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/memory/test_vector_store.py::TestVectorStore::test_downloads_pdf_and_returns_content PASSED [ 66%]
llama_stack/providers/tests/memory/test_vector_store.py::TestVectorStore::test_downloads_pdf_and_returns_content_with_url_object PASSED [100%]
======================================================= 3 passed, 1 warning in 0.62s =======================================================
```
Tested manually via [this
script](afc8f8bebf/init.py)
to initialize and [this
script](afc8f8bebf/query.py)
to query
```bash
# Ran with meta-reference-gpu with safety
llama stack build --template meta-reference-gpu --image-type conda && llama stack run distributions/meta-reference-gpu/run-with-safety.yaml \
--port 5001 \
--env INFERENCE_MODEL=meta-llama/Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct
# Run init.py script
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aidando73/llama-stack/afc8f8bebf70e1ad065d87e84692e1a3a45d9e19/init.py
pip install httpx==0.27.2 # Due to issue https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-client-python/issues/54
python init.py
# Run query.py script
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aidando73/llama-stack/afc8f8bebf70e1ad065d87e84692e1a3a45d9e19/query.py
python query.py
```
Should output valid text chunks
```
Chunk(content=' that it has a significantly\nlower violation rate than the competing standalone open source model, trading off a higher false refusal rate.\nLong-context safety. Long-context models are vulnerable to many-shot jailbreaking attacks without targeted\nmitigation (Anil et al., 2024). To address this, we finetune our models on SFT datasets that include examples\nof safe behavior in the presence of demonstrations of unsafe behavior in context. We develop a scalable\nmitigation strategy that significantly reduces VR, effectively neutralizing the impact of longer context attacks\neven for 256-shot attacks. This approach shows little to no impact on FRR and most helpfulness metrics.\nTo quantify the effectiveness of our long context safety mitigations, we use two additional benchmarking\nmethods: DocQA and Many-shot. For DocQA, short for “document question answering,” we use long documents\nwith information that could be utilized in adversarial ways. Models are provided both the document and a set\nof prompts related to the document in order to test whether the questions being related to information in the\ndocument affected the model’s ability to respond safely to the prompts. For Many-shot, following Anil et al.\n(2024), we construct a synthetic chat history composed of unsafe prompt-response pairs. A final prompt,\nunrelated to previous messages, is used to test whether the unsafe behavior in-context influenced the model\n45\nto response unsafely. The violation and false refusal rates for both DocQA and Many-shot are shown in\nFigure 20. We see that Llama 405B (with and without Llama Guard) is Pareto-better than the Comp. 2\nsystem across both violation rates and false refusal rates, across both DocQA and Many-shot. Relative to\nComp. 1, we find that Llama 405B is significantly safer, while coming at a trade off on false refusal.\nTool usage safety. The diversity of possible tools and the implementation of the tool usage call and integration\ninto the model make tool usage a challenging capability to fully mitigate (Wallace et al., 2024). We focus on\nthe search usecase. Violation and false refusal rates are shown in Figure 20. We tested against the Comp. 1\nsystem, where we find that Llama 405B is significantly safer, though has a slightly higher false refusal rate.\n5.4.5 Cybersecurity and Chemical/Biological Weapons Safety\nCyberSecurity evaluation results. To evaluate cybersecurity risk, we leverage the Cyber', document_id='num-0', token_count=512)0.7354530813978312
Chunk(content='.\nThrough careful ablations, we observe that mixing0.1% of synthetically generated long-context data with the\noriginal short-context data optimizes the performance across both short-context and long-context benchmarks.\nDPO. We observe that using only short context training data in DPO did not negatively impact long-context\nperformance as long as the SFT model is high quality in long context tasks. We suspect this is due to the\nfact that our DPO recipe has fewer optimizer steps than SFT. Given this finding, we keep the standard\nshort-context recipe for DPO on top of our long-context SFT checkpoints.\n4.3.5 Tool Use\nTeaching LLMs to use tools such as search engines or code interpreters hugely expands the range of tasks\nthey can solve, transforming them from pure chat models into more general assistants (Nakano et al., 2021;\nThoppilan et al., 2022; Parisi et al., 2022; Gao et al., 2023; Mialon et al., 2023a; Schick et al., 2024). We train\nLlama 3 to interact with the following tools:\n• Search engine. Llama 3 is trained to use Brave Search7 to answer questions about recent events that go\nbeyond its knowledge cutoff or that require retrieving a particular piece of information from the web.\n• Python interpreter. Llama 3 can generate and execute code to perform complex computations, read files\nuploaded by the user and solve tasks based on them such as question answering, summarization, data\nanalysis or visualization.\n7https://brave.com/search/api/\n24\n• Mathematical computational engine. Llama 3 can use the Wolfram Alpha API8 to more accurately solve\nmath, science problems, or retrieve accurate information from Wolfram’s database.\nThe resulting model is able to use these tools in a chat setup to solve the user’s queries, including in multi-turn\ndialogs. If a query requires multiple tool calls, the model can write a step-by-step plan, call the tools in\nsequence, and do reasoning after each tool call.\nWe also improve Llama 3’s zero-shot tool use capabilities — given in-context, potentially unseen tool definitions\nand a user query, we train the model to generate the correct tool call.\nImplementation. We implement our core tools as Python objects with different methods. Zero-shot tools can\nbe implemented as Python functions with descriptions, documentation (i.e., examples for', document_id='num-0', token_count=512)0.7350672465928054
Chunk(content=' Embeddings RoPE (θ = 500, 000)\nTable 3 Overview of the key hyperparameters of Llama 3. We display settings for 8B, 70B, and 405B language models.\n• We use a vocabulary with 128K tokens. Our token vocabulary combines 100K tokens from thetiktoken3\ntokenizer with 28K additional tokens to better support non-English languages. Compared to the Llama\n2 tokenizer, our new tokenizer improves compression rates on a sample of English data from 3.17 to\n3.94 characters per token. This enables the model to “read” more text for the same amount of training\ncompute. We also found that adding 28K tokens from select non-English languages improved both\ncompression ratios and downstream performance, with no impact on English tokenization.\n• We increase the RoPE base frequency hyperparameter to 500,000. This enables us to better support\nlonger contexts; Xiong et al. (2023) showed this value to be effective for context lengths up to 32,768.\nLlama 3 405B uses an architecture with 126 layers, a token representation dimension of 16,384, and 128\nattention heads; see Table 3 for details. This leads to a model size that is approximately compute-optimal\naccording to scaling laws on our data for our training budget of3.8 × 1025 FLOPs.\n3.2.1 Scaling Laws\nWe develop scaling laws (Hoffmann et al., 2022; Kaplan et al., 2020) to determine the optimal model size for\nour flagship model given our pre-training compute budget. In addition to determining the optimal model size,\na major challenge is to forecast the flagship model’s performance on downstream benchmark tasks, due to a\ncouple of issues: (1) Existing scaling laws typically predict only next-token prediction loss rather than specific\nbenchmark performance. (2) Scaling laws can be noisy and unreliable because they are developed based on\npre-training runs conducted with small compute budgets (Wei et al., 2022b).\nTo address these challenges, we implement a two-stage methodology to develop scaling laws that accurately\npredict downstream benchmark performance:\n1. We first establish a correlation between the compute-optimal model’s negative log-likelihood on down-\nstream tasks and the training FLOPs.\n2. Next, we correlate the negative log-likelihood on downstream tasks with task accuracy, utilizing both', document_id='num-0', token_count=512)0.7172908346230037
```
## Before submitting
- [x] N/A - This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss
the other checks if that's the case).
- [x] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [x] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [x] N/A - Updated relevant documentation.
- [x] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
# What does this PR do?
- llama-stack build --config help text references example_configs which
no longer exists
- Update to refer new directory format to avoid confusion
## Before submitting
- [x] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
# What does this PR do?
- Addresses issue (#586 )
## Test Plan
```
python llama_stack/scripts/distro_codegen.py
```
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [ ] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
Library client used _server_ side types which was no bueno. The fix here
is not the completely correct fix but it is good for enough and for the
demo notebook.
This brings an interesting aspect -- we need to maintain session-level
tempdir state (!) since the model was told there was some resource at a
given location that it needs to maintain
# What does this PR do?
Addresses issue (#391)
- Adds json structured output for vLLM
- Enables structured output tests for vLLM
> Give me a recipe for Spaghetti Bolognaise:
```json
{
"recipe_name": "Spaghetti Bolognaise",
"preamble": "Ah, spaghetti bolognaise - the quintessential Italian dish that fills my kitchen with the aromas of childhood nostalgia. As a child, I would watch my nonna cook up a big pot of spaghetti bolognaise every Sunday, filling our small Italian household with the savory scent of simmering meat and tomatoes. The way the sauce would thicken and the spaghetti would al dente - it was love at first bite. And now, as a chef, I want to share that same love with you, so you can recreate these warm, comforting memories at home.",
"ingredients": [
"500g minced beef",
"1 medium onion, finely chopped",
"2 cloves garlic, minced",
"1 carrot, finely chopped",
" celery, finely chopped",
"1 (28 oz) can whole peeled tomatoes",
"1 tbsp tomato paste",
"1 tsp dried basil",
"1 tsp dried oregano",
"1 tsp salt",
"1/2 tsp black pepper",
"1/2 tsp sugar",
"1 lb spaghetti",
"Grated Parmesan cheese, for serving",
"Extra virgin olive oil, for serving"
],
"steps": [
"Heat a large pot over medium heat and add a generous drizzle of extra virgin olive oil.",
"Add the chopped onion, garlic, carrot, and celery and cook until the vegetables are soft and translucent, about 5-7 minutes.",
"Add the minced beef and cook until browned, breaking it up with a spoon as it cooks.",
"Add the tomato paste and cook for 1-2 minutes, stirring constantly.",
"Add the canned tomatoes, dried basil, dried oregano, salt, black pepper, and sugar. Stir well to combine.",
"Bring the sauce to a simmer and let it cook for 20-30 minutes, stirring occasionally, until the sauce has thickened and the flavors have melded together.",
"While the sauce cooks, bring a large pot of salted water to a boil and cook the spaghetti according to the package instructions until al dente. Reserve 1 cup of pasta water before draining the spaghetti.",
"Add the reserved pasta water to the sauce and stir to combine.",
"Combine the cooked spaghetti and sauce, tossing to coat the pasta evenly.",
"Serve hot, topped with grated Parmesan cheese and a drizzle of extra virgin olive oil.",
"Enjoy!"
]
}
```
Generated with Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct model - pretty good for a 3B
parameter model 👍
## Test Plan
`pytest -v -s
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py -k
llama_3b-vllm_remote`
With the following setup:
```bash
# Environment
export INFERENCE_MODEL=meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct
export INFERENCE_PORT=8000
export VLLM_URL=http://localhost:8000/v1
# vLLM server
sudo docker run --gpus all \
-v $STORAGE_DIR/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \
--env "HUGGING_FACE_HUB_TOKEN=$(cat ~/.cache/huggingface/token)" \
-p 8000:$INFERENCE_PORT \
--ipc=host \
--net=host \
vllm/vllm-openai:v0.6.3.post1 \
--model $INFERENCE_MODEL
# llama-stack server
llama stack build --template remote-vllm --image-type conda && llama stack run distributions/remote-vllm/run.yaml \
--port 5001 \
--env INFERENCE_MODEL=meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct
```
Results:
```
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_model_list[llama_3b-vllm_remote] PASSED
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_completion[llama_3b-vllm_remote] SKIPPED
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_completions_structured_output[llama_3b-vllm_remote] SKIPPED
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_non_streaming[llama_3b-vllm_remote] PASSED
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_structured_output[llama_3b-vllm_remote] PASSED
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_streaming[llama_3b-vllm_remote] PASSED
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_with_tool_calling[llama_3b-vllm_remote] PASSED
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_with_tool_calling_streaming[llama_3b-vllm_remote] PASSED
================================ 6 passed, 2 skipped, 120 deselected, 2 warnings in 13.26s ================================
```
## Sources
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/discussions/8300
- By default, vLLM uses https://github.com/dottxt-ai/outlines for
structured outputs
[[1](32e7db2536/vllm/engine/arg_utils.py (L279-L280))]
## Before submitting
[N/A] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case)
- [x] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [x] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
[N/A?] Updated relevant documentation. Couldn't find any relevant
documentation. Lmk if I've missed anything.
- [x] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
This PR does a few things:
- it moves "direct client" to llama-stack repo instead of being in the
llama-stack-client-python repo
- renames it to `LlamaStackLibraryClient`
- actually makes synchronous generators work
- makes streaming and non-streaming work properly
In many ways, this PR makes things finally "work"
## Test Plan
See a `library_client_test.py` I added. This isn't really quite a test
yet but it demonstrates that this mode now works. Here's the invocation
and the response:
```
INFERENCE_MODEL=meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct python llama_stack/distribution/tests/library_client_test.py ollama
```
# What does this PR do?
#525 introduced a telemetry configuration named jaeger, but what it
really is pointing to is an OTLP HTTP endpoint which is supported by
most servers in the ecosystem, including raw opentelemetry collectors,
several APMs, and even https://github.com/ymtdzzz/otel-tui
I chose to rename this to "otel" as it will bring in more people to the
ecosystem vs feeling it only works with jaeger. Later, we can use the
[standard
ENV](https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/otel/protocol/exporter/) to
configure this if we like so that you can override things with variables
people might expect.
Note: I also added to the README that you have to install conda.
Depending on experience level of the user, and especially with miniforge
vs other ways, I felt this helps.
## Test Plan
I would like to test this, but actually got a little lost. The previous
PRs referenced yaml which doesn't seem published anywhere. It would be
nice to have a pre-canned setup that uses ollama and turns on otel, but
would also appreciate a hand on instructions meanwhile.
## Sources
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/525
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [x] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [x] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
---------
Signed-off-by: Adrian Cole <adrian.cole@elastic.co>
This PR adds two new methods to the telemetry API:
1) Gives the ability to query spans directly instead of first querying
traces and then using that to get spans
2) Another method save_spans_to_dataset, which builds on the query spans
to save it on dataset.
This give the ability to saves spans that are part of an agent session
to a dataset.
The unique aspect of this API is that we dont require each provider of
telemetry to implement this method. Hence, its implemented in the
protocol class itself. This required the protocol check to be slightly
modified.
When running:
python -m llama_stack.apis.safety.client localhost 5000
The API server was logging:
INFO: ::1:57176 - "POST /safety/run_shield HTTP/1.1" 404 Not Found
This patch uses the versioned API, uses the updated safety endpoint, and
updates the model name to what's being served. The above python command
now demonstrates a passing and failing example.
# What does this PR do?
Change the Telemetry API to be able to support different use cases like
returning traces for the UI and ability to export for Evals.
Other changes:
* Add a new trace_protocol decorator to decorate all our API methods so
that any call to them will automatically get traced across all impls.
* There is some issue with the decorator pattern of span creation when
using async generators, where there are multiple yields with in the same
context. I think its much more explicit by using the explicit context
manager pattern using with. I moved the span creations in agent instance
to be using with
* Inject session id at the turn level, which should quickly give us all
traces across turns for a given session
Addresses #509
## Test Plan
```
llama stack run /Users/dineshyv/.llama/distributions/llamastack-together/together-run.yaml
PYTHONPATH=. python -m examples.agents.rag_with_memory_bank localhost 5000
curl -X POST 'http://localhost:5000/alpha/telemetry/query-traces' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{
"attribute_filters": [
{
"key": "session_id",
"op": "eq",
"value": "dd667b87-ca4b-4d30-9265-5a0de318fc65" }],
"limit": 100,
"offset": 0,
"order_by": ["start_time"]
}' | jq .
[
{
"trace_id": "6902f54b83b4b48be18a6f422b13e16f",
"root_span_id": "5f37b85543afc15a",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:30.501587",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:36.026463"
},
{
"trace_id": "92227dac84c0615ed741be393813fb5f",
"root_span_id": "af7c5bb46665c2c8",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:36.031170",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:41.693301"
},
{
"trace_id": "7d578a6edac62f204ab479fba82f77b6",
"root_span_id": "1d935e3362676896",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:41.695204",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:47.228016"
},
{
"trace_id": "dbd767d76991bc816f9f078907dc9ff2",
"root_span_id": "f5a7ee76683b9602",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:47.234578",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:53.189412"
}
]
curl -X POST 'http://localhost:5000/alpha/telemetry/get-span-tree' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{ "span_id" : "6cceb4b48a156913", "max_depth": 2, "attributes_to_return": ["input"] }' | jq .
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 875 100 790 100 85 18462 1986 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 20833
{
"span_id": "6cceb4b48a156913",
"trace_id": "dafa796f6aaf925f511c04cd7c67fdda",
"parent_span_id": "892a66d726c7f990",
"name": "retrieve_rag_context",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T09:28:21.781995",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T09:28:21.913352",
"attributes": {
"input": [
"{\"role\":\"system\",\"content\":\"You are a helpful assistant\"}",
"{\"role\":\"user\",\"content\":\"What are the top 5 topics that were explained in the documentation? Only list succinct bullet points.\",\"context\":null}"
]
},
"children": [
{
"span_id": "1a2df181854064a8",
"trace_id": "dafa796f6aaf925f511c04cd7c67fdda",
"parent_span_id": "6cceb4b48a156913",
"name": "MemoryRouter.query_documents",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T09:28:21.787620",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T09:28:21.906512",
"attributes": {
"input": null
},
"children": [],
"status": "ok"
}
],
"status": "ok"
}
```
<img width="1677" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-04 at 9 42 56 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4d3cea93-05ce-415a-93d9-4b1628631bf8">
# What does this PR do?
1) Implement `unregister_dataset(dataset_id)` API in both llama stack
routing table and providers: It removes {dataset_id -> Dataset} mapping
from routing table and removes the dataset_id references in provider as
well (ex. for huggingface, we use a KV store to store the dataset id =>
dataset. we delete it during unregistering as well)
2) expose the datasets/unregister_dataset api endpoint
## Test Plan
**Unit test:**
`
pytest llama_stack/providers/tests/datasetio/test_datasetio.py -m
"huggingface" -v -s --tb=short --disable-warnings
`
**Test on endpoint:**
tested llama stack using an ollama distribution template:
1) start an ollama server
2) Start a llama stack server with the default ollama distribution
config + dataset/datasetsio APIs + datasetio provider
```
---- .../ollama-run.yaml
...
apis:
- agents
- inference
- memory
- safety
- telemetry
- datasetio
- datasets
providers:
datasetio:
- provider_id: localfs
provider_type: inline::localfs
config: {}
...
```
saw that the new API showed up in startup script
```
Serving API datasets
GET /alpha/datasets/get
GET /alpha/datasets/list
POST /alpha/datasets/register
POST /alpha/datasets/unregister
```
3) query `/alpha/datasets/unregister` through curl (since we have not implemented unregister api in llama stack client)
```
(base) sxyi@sxyi-mbp llama-stack % llama-stack-client datasets register
--dataset-id sixian --url
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pytorch/torchtune/main/docs/source/tutorials/chat.rst
--schema {}
(base) sxyi@sxyi-mbp llama-stack % llama-stack-client datasets list
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ identifier ┃ provider_id ┃ metadata ┃ type ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━┩
│ sixian │ localfs │ {} │ dataset │
└────────────┴─────────────┴──────────┴─────────┘
(base) sxyi@sxyi-mbp llama-stack % llama-stack-client datasets register
--dataset-id sixian2 --url
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pytorch/torchtune/main/docs/source/tutorials/chat.rst
--schema {}
(base) sxyi@sxyi-mbp llama-stack % llama-stack-client datasets list
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ identifier ┃ provider_id ┃ metadata ┃ type ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━┩
│ sixian │ localfs │ {} │ dataset │
│ sixian2 │ localfs │ {} │ dataset │
└────────────┴─────────────┴──────────┴─────────┘
(base) sxyi@sxyi-mbp llama-stack % curl
http://localhost:5001/alpha/datasets/unregister \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"dataset_id": "sixian"}'
null%
(base) sxyi@sxyi-mbp llama-stack % llama-stack-client datasets list
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ identifier ┃ provider_id ┃ metadata ┃ type ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━┩
│ sixian2 │ localfs │ {} │ dataset │
└────────────┴─────────────┴──────────┴─────────┘
(base) sxyi@sxyi-mbp llama-stack % curl
http://localhost:5001/alpha/datasets/unregister \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"dataset_id": "sixian2"}'
null%
(base) sxyi@sxyi-mbp llama-stack % llama-stack-client datasets list
```
## Sources
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [ ] Read the [contributor guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
