# What does this PR do?
In the Responses API, we convert incoming response requests to chat
completion requests. When streaming the resulting chunks of those chat
completion requests, inference providers that use OpenAI clients will
often return a `type=None` value in the tool call parts of the response.
This causes issues when we try to dump and load that response into our
pydantic model, because type cannot be None in the Responses API model
we're loading these into.
So, strip the "type" field, if present, off those chat completion tool
call results before dumping and loading them as our typed pydantic
models, which will apply our default value for that type field.
## Test Plan
This was found via manual testing of the Responses API with codex, where
I was getting errors in some tool call situations. I added a unit test
to simulate this scenario and verify the fix, as well as manual codex
testing to verify the fix.
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This is a combination of what was previously 3 separate PRs - #2069,
#2075, and #2083. It turns out all 3 of those are needed to land a
working function calling Responses implementation. The web search
builtin tool was already working, but this wires in support for custom
function calling.
I ended up combining all three into one PR because they all had lots of
merge conflicts, both with each other but also with #1806 that just
landed. And, because landing any of them individually would have only
left a partially working implementation merged.
The new things added here are:
* Storing of input items from previous responses and restoring of those
input items when adding previous responses to the conversation state
* Handling of multiple input item messages roles, not just "user"
messages.
* Support for custom tools passed into the Responses API to enable
function calling outside of just the builtin websearch tool.
Closes#2074Closes#2080
## Test Plan
### Unit Tests
Several new unit tests were added, and they all pass. Ran via:
```
python -m pytest -s -v tests/unit/providers/agents/meta_reference/test_openai_responses.py
```
### Responses API Verification Tests
I ran our verification run.yaml against multiple providers to ensure we
were getting a decent pass rate. Specifically, I ensured the new custom
tool verification test passed across multiple providers and that the
multi-turn examples passed across at least some of the providers (some
providers struggle with the multi-turn workflows still).
Running the stack setup for verification testing:
```
llama stack run --image-type venv tests/verifications/openai-api-verification-run.yaml
```
Together, passing 100% as an example:
```
pytest -s -v 'tests/verifications/openai_api/test_responses.py' --provider=together-llama-stack
```
## Documentation
We will need to start documenting the OpenAI APIs, but for now the
Responses stuff is still rapidly evolving so delaying that.
---------
Signed-off-by: Derek Higgins <derekh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Derek Higgins <derekh@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
Add support for the temperature to the responses API
## Test Plan
Manually tested simple case
unit tests added for simple case and tool calls
Signed-off-by: Derek Higgins <derekh@redhat.com>
