# What does this PR do?
Adds support to Vector store Open AI APIs in Qdrant.
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
Closes#2463
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
Signed-off-by: Varsha Prasad Narsing <varshaprasad96@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: ehhuang <ehhuang@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Arceo <arceofrancisco@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
This should be more robust as sometimes its run without running build
first.
## Test Plan
OLLAMA_URL=http://localhost:11434 LLAMA_STACK_TEST_INFERENCE_MODE=replay
LLAMA_STACK_TEST_RECORDING_DIR=tests/integration/recordings
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=server:starter uv run --with pytest-repeat pytest
tests/integration/telemetry
--text-model="ollama/llama3.2:3b-instruct-fp16" -vvs
# What does this PR do?
This PR (1) enables the files API for Weaviate and (2) enables
integration tests for Weaviate, which adds a docker container to the
github action.
This PR also handles a couple of edge cases for in creating the
collection and ensuring the tests all pass.
## Test Plan
CI enabled
---------
Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Arceo <farceo@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
Improve user experience by providing specific guidance when no API key
is available, showing both provider data header and config options with
the correct field name for each provider.
Also adds comprehensive test coverage for API key resolution scenarios.
addresses #2990 for providers using litellm openai mixin
## Test Plan
`./scripts/unit-tests.sh
tests/unit/providers/inference/test_litellm_openai_mixin.py`
This PR significantly refactors the Integration Tests workflow. The main
goal behind the PR was to enable recording of vision tests which were
never run as part of our CI ever before. During debugging, I ended up
making several other changes refactoring and hopefully increasing the
robustness of the workflow.
After doing the experiments, I have updated the trigger event to be
`pull_request_target` so this workflow can get write permissions by
default but it will run with source code from the base (main) branch in
the source repository only. If you do change the workflow, you'd need to
experiment using the `workflow_dispatch` triggers. This should not be
news to anyone using Github Actions (except me!)
It is likely to be a little rocky though while I learn more about GitHub
Actions, etc. Please be patient :)
---------
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
What does this PR do?
This PR adds support for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) training
via the existing HuggingFace inline provider. It introduces a new DPO
training recipe, config schema updates, dataset integration, and
end-to-end testing to support preference-based fine-tuning with TRL.
Test Plan
Added integration test:
tests/integration/post_training/test_post_training.py::TestPostTraining::test_preference_optimize
Ran tests on both CPU and CUDA environments
---------
Co-authored-by: Ubuntu <ubuntu@ip-172-31-43-83.ec2.internal>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
- Initialize route_impls to None in constructor to prevent
AttributeError
- Consolidate initialization checks to single point in request() method
- Improve error message to be more helpful ("Please call initialize()
first")
- Add comprehensive test suite to prevent regressions
The library client now has better error handling when users forget to
call initialize(), showing a clear ValueError instead of confusing
AttributeError. All initialization validation is now centralized in the
request() method, with internal methods (_call_non_streaming,
_call_streaming, _convert_body) relying on this single check for
cleaner, more maintainable code.
closes#2943
## Test Plan
`./scripts/unit-tests.sh`
This PR makes setting up Ollama optional for CI. By default, we use
`replay` mode for inference requests and use the stored results from the
`tests/integration/recordings/` directory.
Every so often, users will update tests which will need us to re-record.
To do this, we check for the existence of a label `re-record-tests` on
the PR. If detected,
- ollama is spun up
- inference mode is set to record
- after the tests are done, if any new changes are detected, they are
pushed back to the PR
## Test Plan
This is GitHub CI. Gotta test it live.
Continuing with https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/2952
This also includes a "fix" to inference store related tests so that we
pull a large number of inference responses from the DB so as to always
find the one we just wrote.
Post training tests need _much_ better thinking before we can re-enable
them to be run on every single PR. Running periodically should be
approached only when it is shown that the tests are reliable and as
light-weight as can be; otherwise, it is just kicking the can down the
road.
Continue to build on top of
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/2941
## Test Plan
Run server with `LLAMA_STACK_TEST_INFERENCE_MODE=record` and then run
the integration tests with `--stack-config=server:starter`. Then restart
the server with `LLAMA_STACK_TEST_INFERENCE_MODE=replay` and re-run the
tests. Verify that no request hit Ollama at any point.
Implements a comprehensive recording and replay system for inference API
calls that eliminates dependency on online inference providers during
testing. The system treats inference as deterministic by recording real
API responses and replaying them in subsequent test runs. Applies to
OpenAI clients (which should cover many inference requests) as well as
Ollama AsyncClient.
For storing, we use a hybrid system: Sqlite for fast lookups and JSON
files for easy greppability / debuggability.
As expected, tests become much much faster (more than 3x in just
inference testing.)
```bash
LLAMA_STACK_TEST_INFERENCE_MODE=record LLAMA_STACK_TEST_RECORDING_DIR=<...> \
uv run pytest -s -v tests/integration/inference \
--stack-config=starter \
-k "not( builtin_tool or safety_with_image or code_interpreter or test_rag )" \
--text-model="ollama/llama3.2:3b-instruct-fp16" \
--embedding-model=sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2
```
```bash
LLAMA_STACK_TEST_INFERENCE_MODE=replay LLAMA_STACK_TEST_RECORDING_DIR=<...> \
uv run pytest -s -v tests/integration/inference \
--stack-config=starter \
-k "not( builtin_tool or safety_with_image or code_interpreter or test_rag )" \
--text-model="ollama/llama3.2:3b-instruct-fp16" \
--embedding-model=sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2
```
- `LLAMA_STACK_TEST_INFERENCE_MODE`: `live` (default), `record`, or
`replay`
- `LLAMA_STACK_TEST_RECORDING_DIR`: Storage location (must be specified
for record or replay modes)
# What does this PR do?
OpenAI Chat Completions supports passing a base64 encoded PDF file to a
model, but Llama Stack currently does not allow for this behavior. This
PR extends our implementation of the OpenAI API spec to change that.
Closes#2129
## Test Plan
A new functional test has been added to test the validity of such a
request
Signed-off-by: Nathan Weinberg <nweinber@redhat.com>
**What:**
- Added OpenAIChatCompletionTextOnlyMessageContent type for text-only
content validation
- Modified OpenAISystemMessageParam, OpenAIAssistantMessageParam,
OpenAIDeveloperMessageParam, and OpenAIToolMessageParam to use text-only
content type instead of mixed content
- OpenAIUserMessageParam unchanged - still accepts both text and images
- Updated OpenAPI spec files to reflect text-only content restrictions
in schemas
closes#2894
**Why:**
- Enforces OpenAI API compatibility by restricting image content to user
messages only
- Prevents API misuse where images might be sent in message types that
don't support them
- Aligns with OpenAI's actual API behavior where only user messages can
contain multimodal content
- Improves type safety and validation at the API boundary
**Test plan:**
- Added comprehensive parametrized tests covering all 5 OpenAI message
types
- Tests verify text string acceptance for all message types
- Tests verify text list acceptance for all message types
- Tests verify image rejection for system/assistant/developer/tool
messages (ValidationError expected)
- Tests verify user messages still accept images (backward compatibility
maintained)
# What does this PR do?
- Add base_url field to OpenAIConfig with default
"https://api.openai.com/v1"
- Update sample_run_config to support OPENAI_BASE_URL environment
variable
- Modify get_base_url() to return configured base_url instead of
hardcoded value
- Add comprehensive test suite covering:
- Default base URL behavior
- Custom base URL from config
- Environment variable override
- Config precedence over environment variables
- Client initialization with configured URL
- Model availability checks using configured URL
This enables users to configure custom OpenAI-compatible API endpoints
via environment variables or configuration files.
Closes#2910
## Test Plan
run unit tests
# What does this PR do?
provider_id is no longer valid in a build.yaml, remove it in the
external provider test
Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
<!-- Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to
relevant issues if applicable. -->
- Added `set -e` to the beginning of the unit test script to ensure the
script exits on failure and correctly fails the CI when tests do not
pass.
- Fixed all unit tests that were silently failing in the CI.
- Fixed Python 3.13 unit test CI failing silently.
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
Closes#2877
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
- **Previously:** Unit tests passing in CI eventhough it failed 11 tests
->
[CI-run](4683681501 (step):4:2097)
- **Made the fix. Now, ensuring CI fails as expected on test failures:**
Unit tests failing in CI with 1 failed test ->
[CI-run](4684234247 (step):4:1506)
- This PR shows the CI passing and all unit tests passing.
Add support for deleting individual chunks from vector stores
- Add abstract remove_chunk() method to EmbeddingIndex base class
- Implement chunk deletion for Faiss provider, SQLite Vec, Milvus,
PGVector
- Placeholder implementations with NotImplementedError for
Chroma/Qdrant/Weaviate
- Integrate chunk deletion into OpenAI vector store file deletion flow
- removed xfail from
test_openai_vector_store_delete_file_removes_from_vector_store
Closes: #2477
---------
Signed-off-by: Derek Higgins <derekh@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Arceo <arceofrancisco@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
Enable Chroma inline unit tests and fix integration tests.
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
---------
Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Arceo <farceo@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
Today, external providers are installed via the `external_providers_dir`
in the config. This necessitates users to understand the `ProviderSpec`
and set up their directories accordingly. This process splits up the
config for the stack across multiple files, directories, and formats.
Most (if not all) external providers today have a
[get_provider_spec](559cb18fbb/src/ramalama_stack/provider.py (L9))
method that sits unused. Utilizing this method rather than the
providers.d route allows for a much easier installation process for
external providers and limits the amount of extra configuration a
regular user has to do to get their stack off the ground.
To accomplish this and wire it throughout the build process, Introduce
the concept of a `module` for users to specify for an external provider
upon build time. In order to facilitate this, align the build and run
spec to use `Provider` class rather than the stringified provider_type
that build currently uses.
For example, say this is in your build config:
```
- provider_id: ramalama
provider_type: remote::ramalama
module: ramalama_stack
```
during build (in the various `build_...` scripts), additionally to
installing any pip dependencies we will also install this module and use
the `get_provider_spec` method to retrieve the ProviderSpec that is
currently specified using `providers.d`.
In production so far, providing instructions for installing external
providers for users has been difficult: they need to install the module
as a pre-req, create the providers.d directory, copy in the provider
spec, and also copy in the necessary build/run yaml files. Accessing an
external provider should be as easy as possible, and pointing to its
installable module aligns more with the rest of our build and dependency
management process.
For now, `external_providers_dir` still exists as an alternate more
declarative method of using external providers.
## Test Plan
added an integration test installing an external provider from module
and more unit test coverage for `get_provider_registry`
( the warning in yellow is expected, the module is installed inside of
the build env, not where we are running the command)
<img width="1119" height="400" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-24 at 11 30
48 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1efbaf45-b9e8-451a-bd63-264ed664706d"
/>
<img width="1154" height="618" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-24 at 11 31
14 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/feb2b3ea-c5dd-418e-9662-9a3bd5dd6bdc"
/>
---------
Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
- Added ability to specify `required_scope` when declaring an API. This
is part of the `@webmethod` decorator.
- If auth is enabled, a user can access an API only if
`user.attributes['scope']` includes the `required_scope`
- We add `required_scope='telemetry.read'` to the telemetry read APIs.
## Test Plan
CI with added tests
1. Enable server.auth with github token
2. Observe `client.telemetry.query_traces()` returns 403
# What does this PR do?
Prototype on a new feature to allow new APIs to be plugged in Llama
Stack. Opened for early feedback on the approach and test appetite on
the functionality.
@ashwinb @raghotham open for early feedback, thanks!
---------
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
This flips #2823 and #2805 by making the Stack periodically query the
providers for models rather than the providers going behind the back and
calling "register" on to the registry themselves. This also adds support
for model listing for all other providers via `ModelRegistryHelper`.
Once this is done, we do not need to manually list or register models
via `run.yaml` and it will remove both noise and annoyance (setting
`INFERENCE_MODEL` environment variables, for example) from the new user
experience.
In addition, it adds a configuration variable `allowed_models` which can
be used to optionally restrict the set of models exposed from a
provider.
- Add setup-vllm GitHub action to start VLLM container
- Extend integration test matrix to support both ollama and vllm
providers
- Make test setup conditional based on provider type
- Add provider-specific environment variables and configurations
- vllm tests setup to run weekly or can be triggered manually (only
ollama on PR)
TODO:
investigate failing tests for vllm provider (safety and post_training)
Also need a proper fix for #2713 (tmp fix for this in the first commit
in this PR)
Closes: #1648
---------
Signed-off-by: Derek Higgins <derekh@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This PR implements the openai compatible endpoints for chromadb
Closes#2462
## Test Plan
Ran ollama llama stack server and ran the command
`pytest -sv --stack-config=http://localhost:8321
tests/integration/vector_io/test_openai_vector_stores.py
--embedding-model all-MiniLM-L6-v2`
8 failed, 27 passed, 8 skipped, 1 xfailed
The failed ones are regarding files api
---------
Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Arceo <farceo@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: sarthakdeshpande <sarthak.deshpande@engati.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Javier Arceo <farceo@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Arceo <arceofrancisco@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
<!-- Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to
relevant issues if applicable. -->
I fixed test_access_policy() function providing provider_model_id in
each register model endpoint to pass assertions.
Initially I faced this issue:
```
tests/unit/server/test_quota.py::test_authenticated_quota_allows_up_to_limit
tests/unit/server/test_quota.py::test_authenticated_quota_blocks_after_limit
tests/unit/server/test_quota.py::test_anonymous_quota_allows_up_to_limit
tests/unit/server/test_quota.py::test_anonymous_quota_blocks_after_limit
/Users/iamiller/GitHub/llama-stack/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/aiosqlite/core.py:105: DeprecationWarning: The default datetime adapter is deprecated as of Python 3.12; see the sqlite3 documentation for suggested replacement recipes
result = function()
-- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/capture-warnings.html
============================================================================== short test summary info ===============================================================================
FAILED tests/unit/server/test_access_control.py::test_access_policy - AssertionError: assert 'test_provider/model-1' == 'model-1'
==================================================================== 1 failed, 436 passed, 194 warnings in 20.09s ====================================================================
```
After resolved, all works:
```
-- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/capture-warnings.html
========================================================================= 437 passed, 194 warnings in 19.41s =========================================================================
```
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
Run ` ./scripts/unit-tests.sh`
# What does this PR do?
<!-- Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to
relevant issues if applicable. -->
I noticed a few issues with my implementation of the search mode
validation for RagQuery.
This PR replaces the check for search mode in RagQuery with a Literal.
There were issues before with
```
TypeError: Object of type RAGSearchMode is not JSON serializable
```
When using
```
query_config = RAGQueryConfig(max_chunks=6, mode="vector").model_dump()
```
It also fixes the fact that despite user input "vector" was always the
used search mode.
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
Verify that a chosen search mode works when using Rag Query or use below
agent config:
```
agent = Agent(
client,
model=model_id,
instructions="You are a helpful assistant",
tools=[
{
"name": "builtin::rag/knowledge_search",
"args": {
"vector_db_ids": [vector_db_id],
"query_config": {
"mode": "keyword",
"max_chunks": 6
}
},
}
],
)
```
Running Unit Tests:
```
uv sync --extra dev
uv run pytest tests/unit/rag/test_rag_query.py -v
```
# What does this PR do?
add an `OpenAIMixin` for use by inference providers who remote endpoints
support an OpenAI compatible API.
use is demonstrated by refactoring
- OpenAIInferenceAdapter
- NVIDIAInferenceAdapter (adds embedding support)
- LlamaCompatInferenceAdapter
## Test Plan
existing unit and integration tests
This PR updates model registration and lookup behavior to be slightly
more general / flexible. See
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/2843 for more details.
Note that this change is backwards compatible given the design of the
`lookup_model()` method.
## Test Plan
Added unit tests
# What does this PR do?
<!-- Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to
relevant issues if applicable. -->
This PR fixes flaky telemetry tests
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
See https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/2814
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
Signed-off-by: Mustafa Elbehery <melbeher@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
Refactors the vector store routing logic by moving OpenAI-compatible
vector store operations from the `VectorIORouter` to the
`VectorDBsRoutingTable`.
Closes https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/2761
## Test Plan
Added unit tests to cover new routing logic and ACL checks.
---------
Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Arceo <farceo@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
<!-- Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to
relevant issues if applicable. -->
The pre-commit workflow was failing in the main branch and removing
`@pytest.mark.asyncio `from `test_get_raw_document_text.py` fixed that.
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
# What does this PR do?
<!-- Provide a short summary of what this PR does and why. Link to
relevant issues if applicable. -->
- Added coverage badge to README. - [See my
fork](https://github.com/ChristianZaccaria/llama-stack)
- Added a GitHub Actions workflow that runs the tests and updates the
coverage badge. - [See
run](4574811323)
- Documented steps in `testing.md` for running the tests locally, and
viewing the `html` report.
- Excluded non-essential files from coverage reporting to provide a more
accurate measurement.
Automatically created PR to update coverage badge:
https://github.com/ChristianZaccaria/llama-stack/pull/9
# Note for reviewers
1. Currently the coverage report shows a 45% coverage. Wondering if
there are other files or directories that should also be excluded from
the report to increase the percentage. The directories with the least
test coverage are `llama_stack/cli`, `llama_stack/models`, and
`llama_stack/ui`. - Should we exclude these?
2. **[Required]** The `GITHUB_TOKEN` should have write permissions to
open a PR to update the coverage badge.
# GitHub Issue
<!-- If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Closes #[issue-number] -->
Closes#2355
## Test Plan
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.* -->
The `testing.md` file describes how to run the unit tests locally.
