# What does this PR do?
The goal of this PR is code base modernization.
Schema reflection code needed a minor adjustment to handle UnionTypes
and collections.abc.AsyncIterator. (Both are preferred for latest Python
releases.)
Note to reviewers: almost all changes here are automatically generated
by pyupgrade. Some additional unused imports were cleaned up. The only
change worth of note can be found under `docs/openapi_generator` and
`llama_stack/strong_typing/schema.py` where reflection code was updated
to deal with "newer" types.
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
When clients called the Open AI API with invalid input that wasn't
caught by our own Pydantic API validation but instead only caught by the
backend inference provider, that backend inference provider was
returning a HTTP 400 error. However, we were wrapping that into a HTTP
500 error, obfuscating the actual issue from calling clients and
triggering OpenAI client retry logic.
This change adjusts our existing `translate_exception` method in
`server.py` to wrap `openai.BadRequestError` as HTTP 400 errors, passing
through the string representation of the error message to the calling
user so they can see the actual input validation error and correct it. I
tried changing this in a few other places, but ultimately
`translate_exception` was the only real place to handle this for both
streaming and non-streaming requests across all inference providers that
use the OpenAI server APIs.
This also tightens up our validation a bit for the OpenAI chat
completions API, to catch empty `messages` parameters, invalid
`tool_choice` parameters, invalid `tools` items, or passing
`tool_choice` when `tools` isn't given.
Lastly, this extends our OpenAI API chat completions verifications to
also check for consistent input validation across providers. Providers
behind Llama Stack should automatically pass all the new tests due to
the input validation added here, but some of the providers fail this
test when not run behind Llama Stack due to differences in how they
handle input validation and errors.
(Closes#1951)
## Test Plan
To test this, start an OpenAI API verification stack:
```
llama stack run --image-type venv tests/verifications/openai-api-verification-run.yaml
```
Then, run the new verification tests with your provider(s) of choice:
```
python -m pytest -s -v \
tests/verifications/openai_api/test_chat_completion.py \
--provider openai-llama-stack
python -m pytest -s -v \
tests/verifications/openai_api/test_chat_completion.py \
--provider together-llama-stack
```
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
TLDR: Changes needed to get 100% passing tests for OpenAI API
verification tests when run against Llama Stack with the `together`,
`fireworks`, and `openai` providers. And `groq` is better than before,
at 88% passing.
This cleans up the OpenAI API support for image message types
(specifically `image_url` types) and handling of the `response_format`
chat completion parameter. Both of these required a few more Pydantic
model definitions in our Inference API, just to move from the
not-quite-right stubs I had in place to something fleshed out to match
the actual OpenAI API specs.
As part of testing this, I also found and fixed a bug in the litellm
implementation of openai_completion and openai_chat_completion, so the
providers based on those should actually be working now.
The method `prepare_openai_completion_params` in
`llama_stack/providers/utils/inference/openai_compat.py` was improved to
actually recursively clean up input parameters, including handling of
lists, dicts, and dumping of Pydantic models to dicts. These changes
were required to get to 100% passing tests on the OpenAI API
verification against the `openai` provider.
With the above, the together.ai provider was passing as well as it is
without Llama Stack. But, since we have Llama Stack in the middle, I
took the opportunity to clean up the together.ai provider so that it now
also passes the OpenAI API spec tests we have at 100%. That means
together.ai is now passing our verification test better when using an
OpenAI client talking to Llama Stack than it is when hitting together.ai
directly, without Llama Stack in the middle.
And, another round of work for Fireworks to improve translation of
incoming OpenAI chat completion requests to Llama Stack chat completion
requests gets the fireworks provider passing at 100%. The server-side
fireworks.ai tool calling support with OpenAI chat completions and Llama
4 models isn't great yet, but by pointing the OpenAI clients at Llama
Stack's API we can clean things up and get everything working as
expected for Llama 4 models.
## Test Plan
### OpenAI API Verification Tests
I ran the OpenAI API verification tests as below and 100% of the tests
passed.
First, start a Llama Stack server that runs the `openai` provider with
the `gpt-4o` and `gpt-4o-mini` models deployed. There's not a template
setup to do this out of the box, so I added a
`tests/verifications/openai-api-verification-run.yaml` to do this.
First, ensure you have the necessary API key environment variables set:
```
export TOGETHER_API_KEY="..."
export FIREWORKS_API_KEY="..."
export OPENAI_API_KEY="..."
```
Then, run a Llama Stack server that serves up all these providers:
```
llama stack run \
--image-type venv \
tests/verifications/openai-api-verification-run.yaml
```
Finally, generate a new verification report against all these providers,
both with and without the Llama Stack server in the middle.
```
python tests/verifications/generate_report.py \
--run-tests \
--provider \
together \
fireworks \
groq \
openai \
together-llama-stack \
fireworks-llama-stack \
groq-llama-stack \
openai-llama-stack
```
You'll see that most of the configurations with Llama Stack in the
middle now pass at 100%, even though some of them do not pass at 100%
when hitting the backend provider's API directly with an OpenAI client.
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with vLLM:
I also ran the smaller `test_openai_completion.py` test suite (that's
not yet merged with the verification tests) on multiple of the
providers, since I had to adjust the method signature of
openai_chat_completion a bit and thus had to touch lots of these
providers to match. Here's the tests I ran there, all passing:
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" llama stack build --template remote-vllm --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct"
```
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with ollama
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" llama stack build --template ollama --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0"
```
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with together.ai
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-Turbo" llama stack build --template together --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-Turbo" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-Turbo"
```
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with fireworks.ai
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct" llama stack build --template fireworks --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct"
---------
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This PR adds two methods to the Inference API:
- `batch_completion`
- `batch_chat_completion`
The motivation is for evaluations targeting a local inference engine
(like meta-reference or vllm) where batch APIs provide for a substantial
amount of acceleration.
Why did I not add this to `Api.batch_inference` though? That just
resulted in a _lot_ more book-keeping given the structure of Llama
Stack. Had I done that, I would have needed to create a notion of a
"batch model" resource, setup routing based on that, etc. This does not
sound ideal.
So what's the future of the batch inference API? I am not sure. Maybe we
can keep it for true _asynchronous_ execution. So you can submit
requests, and it can return a Job instance, etc.
## Test Plan
Run meta-reference-gpu using:
```bash
export INFERENCE_MODEL=meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct
export INFERENCE_CHECKPOINT_DIR=../checkpoints/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct-20250331210000
export MODEL_PARALLEL_SIZE=4
export MAX_BATCH_SIZE=32
export MAX_SEQ_LEN=6144
LLAMA_MODELS_DEBUG=1 llama stack run meta-reference-gpu
```
Then run the batch inference test case.
# What does this PR do?
This stubs in some OpenAI server-side compatibility with three new
endpoints:
/v1/openai/v1/models
/v1/openai/v1/completions
/v1/openai/v1/chat/completions
This gives common inference apps using OpenAI clients the ability to
talk to Llama Stack using an endpoint like
http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1 .
The two "v1" instances in there isn't awesome, but the thinking is that
Llama Stack's API is v1 and then our OpenAI compatibility layer is
compatible with OpenAI V1. And, some OpenAI clients implicitly assume
the URL ends with "v1", so this gives maximum compatibility.
The openai models endpoint is implemented in the routing layer, and just
returns all the models Llama Stack knows about.
The following providers should be working with the new OpenAI
completions and chat/completions API:
* remote::anthropic (untested)
* remote::cerebras-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::fireworks (tested)
* remote::fireworks-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::gemini (untested)
* remote::groq-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::nvidia (tested)
* remote::ollama (tested)
* remote::openai (untested)
* remote::passthrough (untested)
* remote::sambanova-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::together (tested)
* remote::together-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::vllm (tested)
The goal to support this for every inference provider - proxying
directly to the provider's OpenAI endpoint for OpenAI-compatible
providers. For providers that don't have an OpenAI-compatible API, we'll
add a mixin to translate incoming OpenAI requests to Llama Stack
inference requests and translate the Llama Stack inference responses to
OpenAI responses.
This is related to #1817 but is a bit larger in scope than just chat
completions, as I have real use-cases that need the older completions
API as well.
## Test Plan
### vLLM
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" llama stack build --template remote-vllm --image-type venv --run
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct"
```
### ollama
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" llama stack build --template ollama --image-type venv --run
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0"
```
## Documentation
Run a Llama Stack distribution that uses one of the providers mentioned
in the list above. Then, use your favorite OpenAI client to send
completion or chat completion requests with the base_url set to
http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1 . Replace "localhost:8321" with the
host and port of your Llama Stack server, if different.
---------
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
Don't return list for runtime tools. Instead return Response object for
pagination and consistency with other APIs.
---------
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
Move pagination logic from LocalFS and HuggingFace implementations into
a common helper function to ensure consistent pagination behavior across
providers. This reduces code duplication and centralizes pagination
logic in one place.
## Test Plan
Run this script:
```
from llama_stack_client import LlamaStackClient
# Initialize the client
client = LlamaStackClient(base_url="http://localhost:8321")
# Register a dataset
response = client.datasets.register(
purpose="eval/messages-answer", # or "eval/question-answer" or "post-training/messages"
source={"type": "uri", "uri": "huggingface://datasets/llamastack/simpleqa?split=train"},
dataset_id="my_dataset", # optional, will be auto-generated if not provided
metadata={"description": "My evaluation dataset"}, # optional
)
# Verify the dataset was registered by listing all datasets
datasets = client.datasets.list()
print(f"Registered datasets: {[d.identifier for d in datasets]}")
# You can then access the data using the datasetio API
# rows = client.datasets.iterrows(dataset_id="my_dataset", start_index=1, limit=2)
rows = client.datasets.iterrows(dataset_id="my_dataset")
print(f"Data: {rows.data}")
```
And play with `start_index` and `limit`.
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
- We cannot directly return a literal type
> Note: this is not final jobs API change
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
<img width="837" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/18a17561-35f9-443d-987d-54afdd6ff40c"
/>
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
This change adds a compact type to include metrics in response as
opposed to the full MetricEvent which is relevant for internal logging
purposes.
## Test Plan
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=~/.llama/distributions/fireworks/fireworks-run.yaml pytest -s -v agents/test_agents.py --safety-shield meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B --text-model meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
llama stack run ~/.llama/distributions/fireworks/fireworks-run.yaml
curl --request POST \
--url http://localhost:8321/v1/inference/chat-completion \
--header 'content-type: application/json' \
--data '{
"model_id": "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct",
"messages": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": {
"type": "text",
"text": "where do humans live"
}
}
],
"stream": false
}'
{
"metrics": [
{
"metric": "prompt_tokens",
"value": 10,
"unit": null
},
{
"metric": "completion_tokens",
"value": 522,
"unit": null
},
{
"metric": "total_tokens",
"value": 532,
"unit": null
}
],
"completion_message": {
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Humans live in various parts of the world...............",
"stop_reason": "out_of_tokens",
"tool_calls": []
},
"logprobs": null
}
```
# What does this PR do?
This PR adds back the changes in #1300 which were reverted in #1476 .
It also adds logic to preserve context variables across asyncio
boundary. this is needed with the library client since the async
generator logic yields control to code outside the event loop, and on
resuming, does not have the same context as before and this requires
preserving the context vars.
address #1477
## Test Plan
```
curl --request POST \
--url http://localhost:8321/v1/inference/chat-completion \
--header 'content-type: application/json' \
--data '{
"model_id": "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct",
"messages": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": {
"type": "text",
"text": "where do humans live"
}
}
],
"stream": false
}' | jq .
{
"metrics": [
{
"trace_id": "kCZwO3tyQC-FuAGb",
"span_id": "bsP_5a5O",
"timestamp": "2025-03-11T16:47:38.549084Z",
"attributes": {
"model_id": "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct",
"provider_id": "fireworks"
},
"type": "metric",
"metric": "prompt_tokens",
"value": 10,
"unit": "tokens"
},
{
"trace_id": "kCZwO3tyQC-FuAGb",
"span_id": "bsP_5a5O",
"timestamp": "2025-03-11T16:47:38.549449Z",
"attributes": {
"model_id": "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct",
"provider_id": "fireworks"
},
"type": "metric",
"metric": "completion_tokens",
"value": 369,
"unit": "tokens"
},
{
"trace_id": "kCZwO3tyQC-FuAGb",
"span_id": "bsP_5a5O",
"timestamp": "2025-03-11T16:47:38.549457Z",
"attributes": {
"model_id": "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct",
"provider_id": "fireworks"
},
"type": "metric",
"metric": "total_tokens",
"value": 379,
"unit": "tokens"
}
],
"completion_message": {
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Humans live on the planet Earth, specifically on its landmasses and in its oceans. Here's a breakdown of where humans live:\n\n1. **Continents:** Humans inhabit all seven continents:\n\t* Africa\n\t* Antarctica ( temporary residents, mostly scientists and researchers)\n\t* Asia\n\t* Australia\n\t* Europe\n\t* North America\n\t* South America\n2. **Countries:** There are 196 countries recognized by the United Nations, and humans live in almost all of them.\n3. **Cities and towns:** Many humans live in urban areas, such as cities and towns, which are often located near coastlines, rivers, or other bodies of water.\n4. **Rural areas:** Some humans live in rural areas, such as villages, farms, and countryside.\n5. **Islands:** Humans inhabit many islands around the world, including those in the Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic Oceans.\n6. **Mountains and highlands:** Humans live in mountainous regions, such as the Himalayas, the Andes, and the Rocky Mountains.\n7. **Deserts:** Some humans live in desert regions, such as the Sahara, the Mojave, and the Atacama.\n8. **Coastal areas:** Many humans live in coastal areas, such as beaches, ports, and coastal cities.\n9. **Underwater habitats:** A few humans live in underwater habitats, such as research stations and submarines.\n10. **Space:** A small number of humans have lived in space, including astronauts on the International Space Station and those who have visited the Moon.\n\nOverall, humans can be found living in almost every environment on Earth, from the frozen tundra to the hottest deserts, and from the highest mountains to the deepest oceans.",
"stop_reason": "end_of_turn",
"tool_calls": []
},
"logprobs": null
}
```
Orignal repro no longer showing any error:
```
LLAMA_STACK_DISABLE_VERSION_CHECK=true llama stack run ~/.llama/distributions/fireworks/fireworks-run.yaml
python -m examples.agents.e2e_loop_with_client_tools localhost 8321
```
client logs:
https://gist.github.com/dineshyv/047c7e87b18a5792aa660e311ea53166
server logs:
https://gist.github.com/dineshyv/97a2174099619e9916c7c490be26e559
# What does this PR do?
This commit introduces a new logging system that allows loggers to be
assigned
a category while retaining the logger name based on the file name. The
log
format includes both the logger name and the category, producing output
like:
```
INFO 2025-03-03 21:44:11,323 llama_stack.distribution.stack:103 [core]: Tool_groups: builtin::websearch served by
tavily-search
```
Key features include:
- Category-based logging: Loggers can be assigned a category (e.g.,
"core", "server") when programming. The logger can be loaded like
this: `logger = get_logger(name=__name__, category="server")`
- Environment variable control: Log levels can be configured
per-category using the
`LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING` environment variable. For example:
`LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING="server=DEBUG;core=debug"` enables DEBUG level for
the "server"
and "core" categories.
- `LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING="all=debug"` sets DEBUG level globally for all
categories and
third-party libraries.
This provides fine-grained control over logging levels while maintaining
a clean and
informative log format.
The formatter uses the rich library which provides nice colors better
stack traces like so:
```
ERROR 2025-03-03 21:49:37,124 asyncio:1758 [uncategorized]: unhandled exception during asyncio.run() shutdown
task: <Task finished name='Task-16' coro=<handle_signal.<locals>.shutdown() done, defined at
/Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py:146>
exception=UnboundLocalError("local variable 'loop' referenced before assignment")>
╭────────────────────────────────────── Traceback (most recent call last) ───────────────────────────────────────╮
│ /Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py:178 in shutdown │
│ │
│ 175 │ │ except asyncio.CancelledError: │
│ 176 │ │ │ pass │
│ 177 │ │ finally: │
│ ❱ 178 │ │ │ loop.stop() │
│ 179 │ │
│ 180 │ loop = asyncio.get_running_loop() │
│ 181 │ loop.create_task(shutdown()) │
╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'loop' referenced before assignment
```
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <@ashwinb>
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
```
python -m llama_stack.distribution.server.server --yaml-config ./llama_stack/templates/ollama/run.yaml
INFO 2025-03-03 21:55:35,918 __main__:365 [server]: Using config file: llama_stack/templates/ollama/run.yaml
INFO 2025-03-03 21:55:35,925 __main__:378 [server]: Run configuration:
INFO 2025-03-03 21:55:35,928 __main__:380 [server]: apis:
- agents
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
---------
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
The commit addresses the Ruff warning B008 by refactoring the code to
avoid calling SamplingParams() directly in function argument defaults.
Instead, it either uses Field(default_factory=SamplingParams) for
Pydantic models or sets the default to None and instantiates
SamplingParams inside the function body when the argument is None.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
Some imports were not switched to in-tree copy of the modules.
This is a follow-up to:
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1344Closes#1435
## Test Plan
Manually started the server...
[//]: # (## Documentation)
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
Inference router computes the token usage related metrics for all
providers and returns the metrics as part of response and also logs to
telemetry.
## Test Plan
LLAMA_STACK_DISABLE_VERSION_CHECK=true llama stack run
~/.llama/distributions/fireworks/fireworks-run.yaml
```
curl --request POST \
--url http://localhost:8321/v1/inference/chat-completion \
--header 'content-type: application/json' \
--data '{
"model_id": "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct",
"messages": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": {
"type": "text",
"text": "where do humans live"
}
}
],
"stream": false
}' | jq .
{
"metrics": [
{
"trace_id": "yjv1tf0jS1evOyPm",
"span_id": "WqYKvg0_",
"timestamp": "2025-02-27T18:55:10.770903Z",
"attributes": {
"model_id": "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct",
"provider_id": "fireworks"
},
"type": "metric",
"metric": "prompt_tokens",
"value": 10,
"unit": "tokens"
},
{
"trace_id": "yjv1tf0jS1evOyPm",
"span_id": "WqYKvg0_",
"timestamp": "2025-02-27T18:55:10.770916Z",
"attributes": {
"model_id": "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct",
"provider_id": "fireworks"
},
"type": "metric",
"metric": "completion_tokens",
"value": 411,
"unit": "tokens"
},
{
"trace_id": "yjv1tf0jS1evOyPm",
"span_id": "WqYKvg0_",
"timestamp": "2025-02-27T18:55:10.770919Z",
"attributes": {
"model_id": "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct",
"provider_id": "fireworks"
},
"type": "metric",
"metric": "total_tokens",
"value": 421,
"unit": "tokens"
}
],
"completion_message": {
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Humans live in various parts of the world, inhabiting almost every continent, country, and region. Here's a breakdown of where humans live:\n\n1. **Continents:** Humans inhabit all seven continents:\n\t* Africa\n\t* Antarctica (research stations only)\n\t* Asia\n\t* Australia\n\t* Europe\n\t* North America\n\t* South America\n2. **Countries:** There are 196 countries recognized by the United Nations, and humans live in almost all of them.\n3. **Regions:** Humans live in diverse regions, including:\n\t* Deserts (e.g., Sahara, Mojave)\n\t* Forests (e.g., Amazon, Congo)\n\t* Grasslands (e.g., Prairies, Steppes)\n\t* Mountains (e.g., Himalayas, Andes)\n\t* Oceans (e.g., coastal areas, islands)\n\t* Tundras (e.g., Arctic, sub-Arctic)\n4. **Cities and towns:** Many humans live in urban areas, such as cities and towns, which are often located near:\n\t* Coastlines\n\t* Rivers\n\t* Lakes\n\t* Mountains\n5. **Rural areas:** Some humans live in rural areas, such as:\n\t* Villages\n\t* Farms\n\t* Countryside\n6. **Islands:** Humans inhabit many islands, including:\n\t* Tropical islands (e.g., Hawaii, Maldives)\n\t* Arctic islands (e.g., Greenland, Iceland)\n\t* Continental islands (e.g., Great Britain, Ireland)\n7. **Extreme environments:** Humans also live in extreme environments, such as:\n\t* High-altitude areas (e.g., Tibet, Andes)\n\t* Low-altitude areas (e.g., Death Valley, Dead Sea)\n\t* Areas with extreme temperatures (e.g., Arctic, Sahara)\n\nOverall, humans have adapted to live in a wide range of environments and ecosystems around the world.",
"stop_reason": "end_of_turn",
"tool_calls": []
},
"logprobs": null
}
```
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v tests/integration/inference
======================================================================== short test summary info =========================================================================
FAILED tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_tool_calling_tools_not_in_request[txt=8B:vis=11B-inference:chat_completion:tool_calling_tools_absent-True] - ValueError: Unsupported tool prompt format: ToolPromptFormat.json
FAILED tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_tool_calling_tools_not_in_request[txt=8B:vis=11B-inference:chat_completion:tool_calling_tools_absent-False] - ValueError: Unsupported tool prompt format: ToolPromptFormat.json
FAILED tests/integration/inference/test_vision_inference.py::test_image_chat_completion_non_streaming[txt=8B:vis=11B] - fireworks.client.error.InvalidRequestError: {'error': {'object': 'error', 'type': 'invalid_request_error', 'message': 'Failed to decode image cannot identify image f...
FAILED tests/integration/inference/test_vision_inference.py::test_image_chat_completion_streaming[txt=8B:vis=11B] - fireworks.client.error.InvalidRequestError: {'error': {'object': 'error', 'type': 'invalid_request_error', 'message': 'Failed to decode image cannot identify image f...
========================================================= 4 failed, 16 passed, 23 xfailed, 17 warnings in 44.36s =========================================================
```
# What does this PR do?
- This was missed from previous deprecation:
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1186
- Part of https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/1396
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
```
pytest -v -s --nbval-lax ./llama-stack/docs/notebooks/Llama_Stack_Benchmark_Evals.ipynb
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
A self-respecting server needs good observability which starts with
configurable logging. Llama Stack had little until now. This PR adds a
`logcat` facility towards that. Callsites look like:
```python
logcat.debug("inference", f"params to ollama: {params}")
```
- the first parameter is a category. there is a static list of
categories in `llama_stack/logcat.py`
- each category can be associated with a log-level which can be
configured via the `LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING` env var.
- a value `LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING=inference=debug;server=info"` does the
obvious thing. there is a special key called `all` which is an alias for
all categories
## Test Plan
Ran with `LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING="all=debug" llama stack run fireworks` and
saw the following:
Hit it with a client-sdk test case and saw this:
Summary:
Lets the model decide which tool it needs to call to respond to a query.
Test Plan:
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/ --safety-shield meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B
```
Also evaluated on a small benchmark with 20 questions from HotpotQA.
With this PR and some prompting, the performance is 77% recall compared
to 50% currently.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with
[ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1015).
* #1268
* #1239
* __->__ #1015
Summary:
Currently we don't set the best tool_prompt_format according to model as
promisd.
Test Plan:
Added print around raw model input and inspected manually
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with
[ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/1214).
* #1234
* __->__ #1214
See Issue #922
The change is slightly backwards incompatible but no callsite (in our
client codebases or stack-apps) every passes a depth-2
`List[List[InterleavedContentItem]]` (which is now disallowed.)
## Test Plan
```bash
$ cd llama_stack/providers/tests/inference
$ pytest -s -v -k fireworks test_embeddings.py \
--inference-model nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5 --env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=784
$ pytest -s -v -k together test_embeddings.py \
--inference-model togethercomputer/m2-bert-80M-8k-retrieval --env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=784
$ pytest -s -v -k ollama test_embeddings.py \
--inference-model all-minilm:latest --env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=784
```
Also ran `tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embeddings.py`
# What does this PR do?
- Fully deprecate eval/tasks
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
Closes#1088
NOTE: this will be a breaking change. We have introduced the new API in
0.1.3 .
Notebook has been updated to use the new endpoints.
## Test Plan
```
pytest -v -s --nbval-lax ./docs/notebooks/Llama_Stack_Benchmark_Evals.ipynb
```
<img width="611" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/79f6efe1-81ba-494e-bf36-1fc0c2b9bc6f"
/>
cc @SLR722 for awareness
[//]: # (## Documentation)
# What does this PR do?
- Update `/eval-tasks` to `/benchmarks`
- ⚠️ Remove differentiation between `app` v.s. `benchmark` eval task
config. Now we only have `BenchmarkConfig`. The overloaded `benchmark`
is confusing and do not add any value. Backward compatibility is being
kept as the "type" is not being used anywhere.
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
- This change is backward compatible
- Run notebook test with
```
pytest -v -s --nbval-lax ./docs/getting_started.ipynb
pytest -v -s --nbval-lax ./docs/notebooks/Llama_Stack_Benchmark_Evals.ipynb
```
<img width="846" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d2fc06a7-593a-444f-bc1f-10ab9b0c843d"
/>
[//]: # (## Documentation)
[//]: # (- [ ] Added a Changelog entry if the change is significant)
---------
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: reidliu <reid201711@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Browning <ben324@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Reid <61492567+reidliu41@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: reidliu <reid201711@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
- Configured ruff linter to automatically fix import sorting issues.
- Set --exit-non-zero-on-fix to ensure non-zero exit code when fixes are
applied.
- Enabled the 'I' selection to focus on import-related linting rules.
- Ran the linter, and formatted all codebase imports accordingly.
- Removed the black dep from the "dev" group since we use ruff
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
[//]: # (## Documentation)
[//]: # (- [ ] Added a Changelog entry if the change is significant)
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
The current default system prompt for llama3.2 tends to overindex on
tool calling and doesn't work well when the prompt does not require tool
calling.
This PR adds an option to override the default system prompt, and
organizes tool-related configs into a new config object.
- [ ] Addresses issue (#issue)
## Test Plan
python -m unittest
llama_stack.providers.tests.inference.test_prompt_adapter
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [ ] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with
[ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/937).
* #938
* __->__ #937
Lint check in main branch is failing. This fixes the lint check after we
moved to ruff in https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/921. We
need to move to a `ruff.toml` file as well as fixing and ignoring some
additional checks.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
Making a few small naming changes as per feedback:
- RAGToolRuntime methods are called `insert` and `query` to keep them
more general
- The tool names are changed to non-namespaced forms
`insert_into_memory` and `query_from_memory`
- The REST endpoints are more REST-ful
See https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/827 for the broader
design.
Third part:
- we need to make `tool_runtime.rag_tool.query_context()` and
`tool_runtime.rag_tool.insert_documents()` methods work smoothly with
complete type safety. To that end, we introduce a sub-resource path
`tool-runtime/rag-tool/` and make changes to the resolver to make things
work.
- the PR updates the agents implementation to directly call these typed
APIs for memory accesses rather than going through the complex, untyped
"invoke_tool" API. the code looks much nicer and simpler (expectedly.)
- there are a number of hacks in the server resolver implementation
still, we will live with some and fix some
Note that we must make sure the client SDKs are able to handle this
subresource complexity also. Stainless has support for subresources, so
this should be possible but beware.
## Test Plan
Our RAG test is sad (doesn't actually test for actual RAG output) but I
verified that the implementation works. I will work on fixing the RAG
test afterwards.
```bash
pytest -s -v tests/agents/test_agents.py -k "rag and together" --safety-shield=meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B
```
See https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/827 for the broader
design.
Second part:
- updates routing table / router code
- updates the faiss implementation
## Test Plan
```
pytest -s -v -k sentence test_vector_io.py --env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=384
```
# What does this PR do?
We are setting a default value of json for tool prompt format, which
conflicts with llama 3.2/3.3 models since they use python list. This PR
changes the defaults to None and in the code, we infer default based on
the model.
Addresses: #695
Tests:
❯ LLAMA_STACK_BASE_URL=http://localhost:5000 pytest -v
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py -k
"test_text_chat_completion"
pytest llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_prompt_adapter.py
# What does this PR do?
PR #639 introduced the notion of Tools API and ability to invoke tools
through API just as any resource. This PR changes the Agents to start
using the Tools API to invoke tools. Major changes include:
1) Ability to specify tool groups with AgentConfig
2) Agent gets the corresponding tool definitions for the specified tools
and pass along to the model
3) Attachements are now named as Documents and their behavior is mostly
unchanged from user perspective
4) You can specify args that can be injected to a tool call through
Agent config. This is especially useful in case of memory tool, where
you want the tool to operate on a specific memory bank.
5) You can also register tool groups with args, which lets the agent
inject these as well into the tool call.
6) All tests have been migrated to use new tools API and fixtures
including client SDK tests
7) Telemetry just works with tools API because of our trace protocol
decorator
## Test Plan
```
pytest -s -v -k fireworks llama_stack/providers/tests/agents/test_agents.py \
--safety-shield=meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B \
--inference-model=meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
pytest -s -v -k together llama_stack/providers/tests/tools/test_tools.py \
--safety-shield=meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B \
--inference-model=meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG="/Users/dineshyv/.llama/distributions/llamastack-together/together-run.yaml" pytest -v tests/client-sdk/agents/test_agents.py
```
run.yaml:
https://gist.github.com/dineshyv/0365845ad325e1c2cab755788ccc5994
Notebook:
https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1ck7hXQxRl6UvT-ijNRZ-gMZxH1G3cN2d?usp=sharing
## What does this PR do?
This is a long-pending change and particularly important to get done
now.
Specifically:
- we cannot "localize" (aka download) any URLs from media attachments
anywhere near our modeling code. it must be done within llama-stack.
- `PIL.Image` is infesting all our APIs via `ImageMedia ->
InterleavedTextMedia` and that cannot be right at all. Anything in the
API surface must be "naturally serializable". We need a standard `{
type: "image", image_url: "<...>" }` which is more extensible
- `UserMessage`, `SystemMessage`, etc. are moved completely to
llama-stack from the llama-models repository.
See https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/pull/244 for the
corresponding PR in llama-models.
## Test Plan
```bash
cd llama_stack/providers/tests
pytest -s -v -k "fireworks or ollama or together" inference/test_vision_inference.py
pytest -s -v -k "(fireworks or ollama or together) and llama_3b" inference/test_text_inference.py
pytest -s -v -k chroma memory/test_memory.py \
--env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=384 --env CHROMA_DB_PATH=/tmp/foobar
pytest -s -v -k fireworks agents/test_agents.py \
--safety-shield=meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B \
--inference-model=meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
```
Updated the client sdk (see PR ...), installed the SDK in the same
environment and then ran the SDK tests:
```bash
cd tests/client-sdk
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=together pytest -s -v agents/test_agents.py
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=ollama pytest -s -v memory/test_memory.py
# this one needed a bit of hacking in the run.yaml to ensure I could register the vision model correctly
INFERENCE_MODEL=llama3.2-vision:latest LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=ollama pytest -s -v inference/test_inference.py
```
# What does this PR do?
Adds the sentence transformer provider and the `all-MiniLM-L6-v2`
embedding model to the default models to register in the run.yaml for
all providers.
## Test Plan
llama stack build --template together --image-type conda
llama stack run
~/.llama/distributions/llamastack-together/together-run.yaml
This PR does the following:
1) adds the ability to generate embeddings in all supported inference
providers.
2) Moves all the memory providers to use the inference API and improved
the memory tests to setup the inference stack correctly and use the
embedding models
This is a merge from #589 and #598
# What does this PR do?
This PR adds a new model type field to support embedding models to be
registered. Summary of changes:
1) Each registered model by default is an llm model.
2) User can specify an embedding model type, while registering.If
specified, the model bypass the llama model checks since embedding
models can by of any type and based on llama.
3) User needs to include the required embedding dimension in metadata.
This will be used by embedding generation to generate the requried size
of embeddings.
## Test Plan
This PR will go together will need to be merged with two follow up PRs
that will include test plans.
# What does this PR do?
Change the Telemetry API to be able to support different use cases like
returning traces for the UI and ability to export for Evals.
Other changes:
* Add a new trace_protocol decorator to decorate all our API methods so
that any call to them will automatically get traced across all impls.
* There is some issue with the decorator pattern of span creation when
using async generators, where there are multiple yields with in the same
context. I think its much more explicit by using the explicit context
manager pattern using with. I moved the span creations in agent instance
to be using with
* Inject session id at the turn level, which should quickly give us all
traces across turns for a given session
Addresses #509
## Test Plan
```
llama stack run /Users/dineshyv/.llama/distributions/llamastack-together/together-run.yaml
PYTHONPATH=. python -m examples.agents.rag_with_memory_bank localhost 5000
curl -X POST 'http://localhost:5000/alpha/telemetry/query-traces' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{
"attribute_filters": [
{
"key": "session_id",
"op": "eq",
"value": "dd667b87-ca4b-4d30-9265-5a0de318fc65" }],
"limit": 100,
"offset": 0,
"order_by": ["start_time"]
}' | jq .
[
{
"trace_id": "6902f54b83b4b48be18a6f422b13e16f",
"root_span_id": "5f37b85543afc15a",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:30.501587",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:36.026463"
},
{
"trace_id": "92227dac84c0615ed741be393813fb5f",
"root_span_id": "af7c5bb46665c2c8",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:36.031170",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:41.693301"
},
{
"trace_id": "7d578a6edac62f204ab479fba82f77b6",
"root_span_id": "1d935e3362676896",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:41.695204",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:47.228016"
},
{
"trace_id": "dbd767d76991bc816f9f078907dc9ff2",
"root_span_id": "f5a7ee76683b9602",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:47.234578",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T08:08:53.189412"
}
]
curl -X POST 'http://localhost:5000/alpha/telemetry/get-span-tree' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{ "span_id" : "6cceb4b48a156913", "max_depth": 2, "attributes_to_return": ["input"] }' | jq .
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 875 100 790 100 85 18462 1986 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 20833
{
"span_id": "6cceb4b48a156913",
"trace_id": "dafa796f6aaf925f511c04cd7c67fdda",
"parent_span_id": "892a66d726c7f990",
"name": "retrieve_rag_context",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T09:28:21.781995",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T09:28:21.913352",
"attributes": {
"input": [
"{\"role\":\"system\",\"content\":\"You are a helpful assistant\"}",
"{\"role\":\"user\",\"content\":\"What are the top 5 topics that were explained in the documentation? Only list succinct bullet points.\",\"context\":null}"
]
},
"children": [
{
"span_id": "1a2df181854064a8",
"trace_id": "dafa796f6aaf925f511c04cd7c67fdda",
"parent_span_id": "6cceb4b48a156913",
"name": "MemoryRouter.query_documents",
"start_time": "2024-12-04T09:28:21.787620",
"end_time": "2024-12-04T09:28:21.906512",
"attributes": {
"input": null
},
"children": [],
"status": "ok"
}
],
"status": "ok"
}
```
<img width="1677" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-04 at 9 42 56 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4d3cea93-05ce-415a-93d9-4b1628631bf8">
This PR changes the way model id gets translated to the final model name
that gets passed through the provider.
Major changes include:
1) Providers are responsible for registering an object and as part of
the registration returning the object with the correct provider specific
name of the model provider_resource_id
2) To help with the common look ups different names a new ModelLookup
class is created.
Tested all inference providers including together, fireworks, vllm,
ollama, meta reference and bedrock
# What does this PR do?
This PR kills the notion of "ShieldType". The impetus for this is the
realization:
> Why is keyword llama-guard appearing so many times everywhere,
sometimes with hyphens, sometimes with underscores?
Now that we have a notion of "provider specific resource identifiers"
and "user specific aliases" for those and the fact that this works with
models ("Llama3.1-8B-Instruct" <> "fireworks/llama-3pv1-..."), we can
follow the same rules for Shields.
So each Safety provider can make up a notion of identifiers it has
registered. This already happens with Bedrock correctly. We just
generalize it for Llama Guard, Prompt Guard, etc.
For Llama Guard, we further simplify by just adopting the underlying
model name itself as the identifier! No confusion necessary.
While doing this, I noticed a bug in our DistributionRegistry where we
weren't scoping identifiers by type. Fixed.
## Feature/Issue validation/testing/test plan
Ran (inference, safety, memory, agents) tests with ollama and fireworks
providers.
