# What does this PR do?
Adds a new endpoint that is compatible with OpenAI for embeddings api.
`/openai/v1/embeddings`
Added providers for OpenAI, LiteLLM and SentenceTransformer.
## Test Plan
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 pytest -sv tests/integration/inference/test_openai_embeddings.py --embedding-model all-MiniLM-L6-v2,text-embedding-3-small,gemini/text-embedding-004
```
# What does this PR do?
The goal of this PR is code base modernization.
Schema reflection code needed a minor adjustment to handle UnionTypes
and collections.abc.AsyncIterator. (Both are preferred for latest Python
releases.)
Note to reviewers: almost all changes here are automatically generated
by pyupgrade. Some additional unused imports were cleaned up. The only
change worth of note can be found under `docs/openapi_generator` and
`llama_stack/strong_typing/schema.py` where reflection code was updated
to deal with "newer" types.
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
The together inference provider was throwing a stack trace every time it
shut down, as it was trying to call a non-existent `close` method on the
AsyncTogether client. While fixing that, I also adjusted its shutdown
logic to close the OpenAI client if we've created one of those, as that
client does have a `close` method.
In testing that, I also realized we were defaulting to treating all
requests as streaming requests instead of defaulting to non-streaming.
So, this flips that default to non-streaming to match how the other
providers work.
## Test Plan
I tested this by ensuring the together inference provider no longer
spits out a long stack trace when shutting it down and by running the
OpenAI API chat completion verification suite to ensure the change in
default streaming logic didn't mess anything else up.
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
TLDR: Changes needed to get 100% passing tests for OpenAI API
verification tests when run against Llama Stack with the `together`,
`fireworks`, and `openai` providers. And `groq` is better than before,
at 88% passing.
This cleans up the OpenAI API support for image message types
(specifically `image_url` types) and handling of the `response_format`
chat completion parameter. Both of these required a few more Pydantic
model definitions in our Inference API, just to move from the
not-quite-right stubs I had in place to something fleshed out to match
the actual OpenAI API specs.
As part of testing this, I also found and fixed a bug in the litellm
implementation of openai_completion and openai_chat_completion, so the
providers based on those should actually be working now.
The method `prepare_openai_completion_params` in
`llama_stack/providers/utils/inference/openai_compat.py` was improved to
actually recursively clean up input parameters, including handling of
lists, dicts, and dumping of Pydantic models to dicts. These changes
were required to get to 100% passing tests on the OpenAI API
verification against the `openai` provider.
With the above, the together.ai provider was passing as well as it is
without Llama Stack. But, since we have Llama Stack in the middle, I
took the opportunity to clean up the together.ai provider so that it now
also passes the OpenAI API spec tests we have at 100%. That means
together.ai is now passing our verification test better when using an
OpenAI client talking to Llama Stack than it is when hitting together.ai
directly, without Llama Stack in the middle.
And, another round of work for Fireworks to improve translation of
incoming OpenAI chat completion requests to Llama Stack chat completion
requests gets the fireworks provider passing at 100%. The server-side
fireworks.ai tool calling support with OpenAI chat completions and Llama
4 models isn't great yet, but by pointing the OpenAI clients at Llama
Stack's API we can clean things up and get everything working as
expected for Llama 4 models.
## Test Plan
### OpenAI API Verification Tests
I ran the OpenAI API verification tests as below and 100% of the tests
passed.
First, start a Llama Stack server that runs the `openai` provider with
the `gpt-4o` and `gpt-4o-mini` models deployed. There's not a template
setup to do this out of the box, so I added a
`tests/verifications/openai-api-verification-run.yaml` to do this.
First, ensure you have the necessary API key environment variables set:
```
export TOGETHER_API_KEY="..."
export FIREWORKS_API_KEY="..."
export OPENAI_API_KEY="..."
```
Then, run a Llama Stack server that serves up all these providers:
```
llama stack run \
--image-type venv \
tests/verifications/openai-api-verification-run.yaml
```
Finally, generate a new verification report against all these providers,
both with and without the Llama Stack server in the middle.
```
python tests/verifications/generate_report.py \
--run-tests \
--provider \
together \
fireworks \
groq \
openai \
together-llama-stack \
fireworks-llama-stack \
groq-llama-stack \
openai-llama-stack
```
You'll see that most of the configurations with Llama Stack in the
middle now pass at 100%, even though some of them do not pass at 100%
when hitting the backend provider's API directly with an OpenAI client.
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with vLLM:
I also ran the smaller `test_openai_completion.py` test suite (that's
not yet merged with the verification tests) on multiple of the
providers, since I had to adjust the method signature of
openai_chat_completion a bit and thus had to touch lots of these
providers to match. Here's the tests I ran there, all passing:
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" llama stack build --template remote-vllm --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct"
```
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with ollama
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" llama stack build --template ollama --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0"
```
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with together.ai
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-Turbo" llama stack build --template together --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-Turbo" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-Turbo"
```
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with fireworks.ai
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct" llama stack build --template fireworks --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct"
---------
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This stubs in some OpenAI server-side compatibility with three new
endpoints:
/v1/openai/v1/models
/v1/openai/v1/completions
/v1/openai/v1/chat/completions
This gives common inference apps using OpenAI clients the ability to
talk to Llama Stack using an endpoint like
http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1 .
The two "v1" instances in there isn't awesome, but the thinking is that
Llama Stack's API is v1 and then our OpenAI compatibility layer is
compatible with OpenAI V1. And, some OpenAI clients implicitly assume
the URL ends with "v1", so this gives maximum compatibility.
The openai models endpoint is implemented in the routing layer, and just
returns all the models Llama Stack knows about.
The following providers should be working with the new OpenAI
completions and chat/completions API:
* remote::anthropic (untested)
* remote::cerebras-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::fireworks (tested)
* remote::fireworks-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::gemini (untested)
* remote::groq-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::nvidia (tested)
* remote::ollama (tested)
* remote::openai (untested)
* remote::passthrough (untested)
* remote::sambanova-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::together (tested)
* remote::together-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::vllm (tested)
The goal to support this for every inference provider - proxying
directly to the provider's OpenAI endpoint for OpenAI-compatible
providers. For providers that don't have an OpenAI-compatible API, we'll
add a mixin to translate incoming OpenAI requests to Llama Stack
inference requests and translate the Llama Stack inference responses to
OpenAI responses.
This is related to #1817 but is a bit larger in scope than just chat
completions, as I have real use-cases that need the older completions
API as well.
## Test Plan
### vLLM
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" llama stack build --template remote-vllm --image-type venv --run
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct"
```
### ollama
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" llama stack build --template ollama --image-type venv --run
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0"
```
## Documentation
Run a Llama Stack distribution that uses one of the providers mentioned
in the list above. Then, use your favorite OpenAI client to send
completion or chat completion requests with the base_url set to
http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1 . Replace "localhost:8321" with the
host and port of your Llama Stack server, if different.
---------
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
## Test Plan
export MODEL=accounts/fireworks/models/llama4-scout-instruct-basic;
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=verification pytest -s -v tests/integration/inference
--vision-model $MODEL --text-model $MODEL
# What does this PR do?
Uses together async client instead of sync client
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
## Test Plan
Command to run the test is in the image below(2 tests fail, and they
were failing for the old stable version as well with the same errors.)
<img width="1689" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/503db720-5379-425d-9844-0225010e41a1"
/>
[//]: # (## Documentation)
---------
Co-authored-by: sarthakdeshpande <sarthak.deshpande@engati.com>
Concurrent requests should not trample (or reuse) each others' provider
data. Provider data should be scoped to each request.
## Test Plan
Set the uvicorn server to have a single worker process + thread by
updating the config:
```python
uvicorn_config = {
...
"workers": 1,
"loop": "asyncio",
}
```
Then perform the following steps on `origin/main` (without this change).
(1) Run the server using `llama stack run dev` without having
`FIREWORKS_API_KEY` in the environment.
(2) Run a test by specifying the FIREWORKS_API_KEY env var so it gets
stored in the thread local
```
pytest -s -v tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--stack-config http://localhost:8321 \
--text-model accounts/fireworks/models/llama-v3p1-8b-instruct \
-k test_text_chat_completion_with_tool_calling_and_streaming \
--env FIREWORKS_API_KEY=<...>
```
Ensure you don't have any other API keys in the environment (otherwise
the bug will not reproduce due to other specifics in our testing code.)
Verify this works.
(3) Run the same command again without specifying FIREWORKS_API_KEY. See
that the request actually succeeds when it *should have failed*.
----
Now do the same tests on this branch, verify step (3) results in
failure.
Finally, run the full `test_text_inference.py` test suite with this
change, verify it succeeds.
# What does this PR do?
This commit introduces a new logging system that allows loggers to be
assigned
a category while retaining the logger name based on the file name. The
log
format includes both the logger name and the category, producing output
like:
```
INFO 2025-03-03 21:44:11,323 llama_stack.distribution.stack:103 [core]: Tool_groups: builtin::websearch served by
tavily-search
```
Key features include:
- Category-based logging: Loggers can be assigned a category (e.g.,
"core", "server") when programming. The logger can be loaded like
this: `logger = get_logger(name=__name__, category="server")`
- Environment variable control: Log levels can be configured
per-category using the
`LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING` environment variable. For example:
`LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING="server=DEBUG;core=debug"` enables DEBUG level for
the "server"
and "core" categories.
- `LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING="all=debug"` sets DEBUG level globally for all
categories and
third-party libraries.
This provides fine-grained control over logging levels while maintaining
a clean and
informative log format.
The formatter uses the rich library which provides nice colors better
stack traces like so:
```
ERROR 2025-03-03 21:49:37,124 asyncio:1758 [uncategorized]: unhandled exception during asyncio.run() shutdown
task: <Task finished name='Task-16' coro=<handle_signal.<locals>.shutdown() done, defined at
/Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py:146>
exception=UnboundLocalError("local variable 'loop' referenced before assignment")>
╭────────────────────────────────────── Traceback (most recent call last) ───────────────────────────────────────╮
│ /Users/leseb/Documents/AI/llama-stack/llama_stack/distribution/server/server.py:178 in shutdown │
│ │
│ 175 │ │ except asyncio.CancelledError: │
│ 176 │ │ │ pass │
│ 177 │ │ finally: │
│ ❱ 178 │ │ │ loop.stop() │
│ 179 │ │
│ 180 │ loop = asyncio.get_running_loop() │
│ 181 │ loop.create_task(shutdown()) │
╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'loop' referenced before assignment
```
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <@ashwinb>
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
```
python -m llama_stack.distribution.server.server --yaml-config ./llama_stack/templates/ollama/run.yaml
INFO 2025-03-03 21:55:35,918 __main__:365 [server]: Using config file: llama_stack/templates/ollama/run.yaml
INFO 2025-03-03 21:55:35,925 __main__:378 [server]: Run configuration:
INFO 2025-03-03 21:55:35,928 __main__:380 [server]: apis:
- agents
```
[//]: # (## Documentation)
---------
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
The commit addresses the Ruff warning B008 by refactoring the code to
avoid calling SamplingParams() directly in function argument defaults.
Instead, it either uses Field(default_factory=SamplingParams) for
Pydantic models or sets the default to None and instantiates
SamplingParams inside the function body when the argument is None.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
A self-respecting server needs good observability which starts with
configurable logging. Llama Stack had little until now. This PR adds a
`logcat` facility towards that. Callsites look like:
```python
logcat.debug("inference", f"params to ollama: {params}")
```
- the first parameter is a category. there is a static list of
categories in `llama_stack/logcat.py`
- each category can be associated with a log-level which can be
configured via the `LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING` env var.
- a value `LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING=inference=debug;server=info"` does the
obvious thing. there is a special key called `all` which is an alias for
all categories
## Test Plan
Ran with `LLAMA_STACK_LOGGING="all=debug" llama stack run fireworks` and
saw the following:
Hit it with a client-sdk test case and saw this:
This PR begins the process of supporting non-llama models within Llama
Stack. We start simple by adding support for this functionality within a
few existing providers: fireworks, together and ollama.
## Test Plan
```bash
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v tests/client-sdk/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--inference-model accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct
```
^ this passes most of the tests but as expected fails the tool calling
related tests since they are very specific to Llama models
```
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_completion_streaming[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct] PASSED
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_completion_log_probs_non_streaming[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct] PASSED
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_completion_log_probs_streaming[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct] PASSED
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_completion_structured_output[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct-completion-01] PASSED
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_non_streaming[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct-Which planet do humans live on?-Earth] PASSED
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_non_streaming[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct-Which planet has rings around it with a name starting w
ith letter S?-Saturn] PASSED
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_streaming[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct-What's the name of the Sun in latin?-Sol] PASSED
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_streaming[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct-What is the name of the US captial?-Washington] PASSED
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_with_tool_calling_and_non_streaming[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct] FAILED
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_with_tool_calling_and_streaming[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct] FAILED
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_with_tool_choice_required[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct] FAILED
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_with_tool_choice_none[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct] PASSED
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_structured_output[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct] ERROR
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_tool_calling_tools_not_in_request[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct-True] PASSED
inference/test_text_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_tool_calling_tools_not_in_request[accounts/fireworks/models/phi-3-vision-128k-instruct-False] PASSED
```
See Issue #922
The change is slightly backwards incompatible but no callsite (in our
client codebases or stack-apps) every passes a depth-2
`List[List[InterleavedContentItem]]` (which is now disallowed.)
## Test Plan
```bash
$ cd llama_stack/providers/tests/inference
$ pytest -s -v -k fireworks test_embeddings.py \
--inference-model nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5 --env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=784
$ pytest -s -v -k together test_embeddings.py \
--inference-model togethercomputer/m2-bert-80M-8k-retrieval --env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=784
$ pytest -s -v -k ollama test_embeddings.py \
--inference-model all-minilm:latest --env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=784
```
Also ran `tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embeddings.py`
There should be a choke-point for llama3.api imports -- this is the
prompt adapter. Creating a ChatFormat() object on demand is inexpensive.
The underlying Tokenizer is a singleton anyway.
# What does this PR do?
Before this change, `distro_codegen.py` would only work if the user
manually installed multiple provider-specific dependencies (see #1122).
Now, users can run `distro_codegen.py` without any provider-specific
dependencies because we avoid importing the entire provider
implementations just to get the config needed to build the provider
template.
Concretely, this mostly means moving the
MODEL_ALIASES (and related variants) definitions to a new models.py
class within the provider implementation for those providers that
require additional dependencies. It also meant moving a couple of
imports from top-level imports to inside `get_adapter_impl` for some
providers, which follows the pattern used by multiple existing
providers.
To ensure we don't regress and accidentally add new imports that cause
distro_codegen.py to fail, the stubbed-in pre-commit hook for
distro_codegen.py was uncommented and slightly tweaked to run via `uv
run python ...` to ensure it runs with only the project's default
dependencies and to run automatically instead of manually.
Lastly, this updates distro_codegen.py itself to keep track of paths it
might have changed and to only `git diff` those specific paths when
checking for changed files instead of doing a diff on the entire working
tree. The latter was overly broad and would require a user have no other
unstaged changes in their working tree, even if those unstaged changes
were unrelated to generated code. Now it only flags uncommitted changes
for paths distro_codegen.py actually writes to.
Our generated code was also out-of-date, presumably because of these
issues, so this commit also has some updates to the generated code
purely because it was out of sync, and the pre-commit hook now enforces
things to be updated.
(Closes#1122)
## Test Plan
I manually tested distro_codegen.py and the pre-commit hook to verify
those work as expected, flagging any uncommited changes and catching any
imports that attempt to pull in provider-specific dependencies.
However, I do not have valid api keys to the impacted provider
implementations, and am unable to easily run the inference tests against
each changed provider. There are no functional changes to the provider
implementations here, but I'd appreciate a second set of eyes on the
changed import statements and moving of MODEL_ALIASES type code to a
separate models.py to ensure I didn't make any obvious errors.
---------
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
llama-models should have extremely minimal cruft. Its sole purpose
should be didactic -- show the simplest implementation of the llama
models and document the prompt formats, etc.
This PR is the complement to
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/pull/279
## Test Plan
Ensure all `llama` CLI `model` sub-commands work:
```bash
llama model list
llama model download --model-id ...
llama model prompt-format -m ...
```
Ran tests:
```bash
cd tests/client-sdk
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v inference/
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v vector_io/
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v agents/
```
Create a fresh venv `uv venv && source .venv/bin/activate` and run
`llama stack build --template fireworks --image-type venv` followed by
`llama stack run together --image-type venv` <-- the server runs
Also checked that the OpenAPI generator can run and there is no change
in the generated files as a result.
```bash
cd docs/openapi_generator
sh run_openapi_generator.sh
```
# What does this PR do?
- Configured ruff linter to automatically fix import sorting issues.
- Set --exit-non-zero-on-fix to ensure non-zero exit code when fixes are
applied.
- Enabled the 'I' selection to focus on import-related linting rules.
- Ran the linter, and formatted all codebase imports accordingly.
- Removed the black dep from the "dev" group since we use ruff
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
[//]: # (## Documentation)
[//]: # (- [ ] Added a Changelog entry if the change is significant)
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
The current default system prompt for llama3.2 tends to overindex on
tool calling and doesn't work well when the prompt does not require tool
calling.
This PR adds an option to override the default system prompt, and
organizes tool-related configs into a new config object.
- [ ] Addresses issue (#issue)
## Test Plan
python -m unittest
llama_stack.providers.tests.inference.test_prompt_adapter
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [ ] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with
[ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/937).
* #938
* __->__ #937
Lint check in main branch is failing. This fixes the lint check after we
moved to ruff in https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/921. We
need to move to a `ruff.toml` file as well as fixing and ignoring some
additional checks.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
1) As per @mattf's suggestion, we want to mark the pytest as xfail for
providers that do not support the functionality. In this diff, we xfail
the logProbs inference tests for providers who does not support log
probs.
( log probs is only supported by together, fireworks and vllm)
2) Added logProbs support for together according to their developer
[doc](https://docs.together.ai/docs/logprobs).
## Test Plan
1) Together & Fireworks
```
export LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=/Users/sxyi/llama-stack/llama_stack/templates/together/run.yaml
/opt/miniconda3/envs/stack/bin/pytest -s -v /Users/sxyi/llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py
```
```
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_text_completion_streaming[meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct] PASSED
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_completion_log_probs_non_streaming[meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct] PASSED
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_completion_log_probs_streaming[meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct] PASSED
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_text_completion_structured_output[meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct] PASSED
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_non_streaming[meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-What are the names of planets in our solar system?-Earth] PASSED
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_non_streaming[meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-What are the names of the planets that have rings around them?-Saturn] PASSED
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_streaming[meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-What's the name of the Sun in latin?-Sol] PASSED
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_streaming[meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-What is the name of the US captial?-Washington] PASSED
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_with_tool_calling_and_non_streaming[meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct] PASSED
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_with_tool_calling_and_streaming[meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct] PASSED
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_text_chat_completion_structured_output[meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct] PASSED
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_image_chat_completion_non_streaming[meta-llama/Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct] PASSED
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_image_chat_completion_streaming[meta-llama/Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct] PASSED
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_image_chat_completion_base64_url[meta-llama/Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct] PASSED
========================================================================================== 15 passed, 2 warnings in 19.46s ===========================================================================================
```
```
export LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=/Users/sxyi/llama-stack/llama_stack/templates/fireworks/run.yaml
/opt/miniconda3/envs/stack/bin/pytest -s -v /Users/sxyi/llama-stack/tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py
```
All tests passed
2) Ollama - LogProbs tests are marked as xfailed.
```
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_completion_log_probs_non_streaming[meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct] XFAIL (remote::ollama doesn't support log probs yet)
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py::test_completion_log_probs_streaming[meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct] XFAIL (remote::ollama doesn't support log probs yet)
```
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [ ] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
# What does this PR do?
We are setting a default value of json for tool prompt format, which
conflicts with llama 3.2/3.3 models since they use python list. This PR
changes the defaults to None and in the code, we infer default based on
the model.
Addresses: #695
Tests:
❯ LLAMA_STACK_BASE_URL=http://localhost:5000 pytest -v
tests/client-sdk/inference/test_inference.py -k
"test_text_chat_completion"
pytest llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_prompt_adapter.py
Add another header so client SDKs can identify their versions which can
be used for immediate detection of possible compatibility issues. A
semver mismatch against the wrong server should be immediately flagged
and requests should be denied.
Also change `X-LlamaStack-ProviderData` to `X-LlamaStack-Provider-Data`
since that hyphenation is better.
# What does this PR do?
PR #639 introduced the notion of Tools API and ability to invoke tools
through API just as any resource. This PR changes the Agents to start
using the Tools API to invoke tools. Major changes include:
1) Ability to specify tool groups with AgentConfig
2) Agent gets the corresponding tool definitions for the specified tools
and pass along to the model
3) Attachements are now named as Documents and their behavior is mostly
unchanged from user perspective
4) You can specify args that can be injected to a tool call through
Agent config. This is especially useful in case of memory tool, where
you want the tool to operate on a specific memory bank.
5) You can also register tool groups with args, which lets the agent
inject these as well into the tool call.
6) All tests have been migrated to use new tools API and fixtures
including client SDK tests
7) Telemetry just works with tools API because of our trace protocol
decorator
## Test Plan
```
pytest -s -v -k fireworks llama_stack/providers/tests/agents/test_agents.py \
--safety-shield=meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B \
--inference-model=meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
pytest -s -v -k together llama_stack/providers/tests/tools/test_tools.py \
--safety-shield=meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B \
--inference-model=meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG="/Users/dineshyv/.llama/distributions/llamastack-together/together-run.yaml" pytest -v tests/client-sdk/agents/test_agents.py
```
run.yaml:
https://gist.github.com/dineshyv/0365845ad325e1c2cab755788ccc5994
Notebook:
https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1ck7hXQxRl6UvT-ijNRZ-gMZxH1G3cN2d?usp=sharing
# What does this PR do?
- add llama3.3 model for together
- fix fireworks distro_codegen
```
python llama_stack/scripts/distro_codegen.py
```
## Test Plan
<img width="1132" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bf94b933-9200-4e73-878e-d1a95d450a88"
/>
**Tests**
```
pytest -v -s -k "together" --inference-model="meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct" ./llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py
```
<img width="1139" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/407dc98b-8de3-4841-8cb1-75e4b5128544"
/>
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [ ] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
## What does this PR do?
This is a long-pending change and particularly important to get done
now.
Specifically:
- we cannot "localize" (aka download) any URLs from media attachments
anywhere near our modeling code. it must be done within llama-stack.
- `PIL.Image` is infesting all our APIs via `ImageMedia ->
InterleavedTextMedia` and that cannot be right at all. Anything in the
API surface must be "naturally serializable". We need a standard `{
type: "image", image_url: "<...>" }` which is more extensible
- `UserMessage`, `SystemMessage`, etc. are moved completely to
llama-stack from the llama-models repository.
See https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/pull/244 for the
corresponding PR in llama-models.
## Test Plan
```bash
cd llama_stack/providers/tests
pytest -s -v -k "fireworks or ollama or together" inference/test_vision_inference.py
pytest -s -v -k "(fireworks or ollama or together) and llama_3b" inference/test_text_inference.py
pytest -s -v -k chroma memory/test_memory.py \
--env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=384 --env CHROMA_DB_PATH=/tmp/foobar
pytest -s -v -k fireworks agents/test_agents.py \
--safety-shield=meta-llama/Llama-Guard-3-8B \
--inference-model=meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
```
Updated the client sdk (see PR ...), installed the SDK in the same
environment and then ran the SDK tests:
```bash
cd tests/client-sdk
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=together pytest -s -v agents/test_agents.py
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=ollama pytest -s -v memory/test_memory.py
# this one needed a bit of hacking in the run.yaml to ensure I could register the vision model correctly
INFERENCE_MODEL=llama3.2-vision:latest LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=ollama pytest -s -v inference/test_inference.py
```
This PR does the following:
1) adds the ability to generate embeddings in all supported inference
providers.
2) Moves all the memory providers to use the inference API and improved
the memory tests to setup the inference stack correctly and use the
embedding models
This is a merge from #589 and #598
# What does this PR do?
Automatically generates
- build.yaml
- run.yaml
- run-with-safety.yaml
- parts of markdown docs
for the distributions.
## Test Plan
At this point, this only updates the YAMLs and the docs. Some testing
(especially with ollama and vllm) has been performed but needs to be
much more tested.
This PR changes the way model id gets translated to the final model name
that gets passed through the provider.
Major changes include:
1) Providers are responsible for registering an object and as part of
the registration returning the object with the correct provider specific
name of the model provider_resource_id
2) To help with the common look ups different names a new ModelLookup
class is created.
Tested all inference providers including together, fireworks, vllm,
ollama, meta reference and bedrock
