# What does this PR do?
switch sambanova inference adaptor to LiteLLM usage to simplify
integration and solve issues with current adaptor when streaming and
tool calling, models and templates updated
## Test Plan
pytest -s -v tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py
--stack-config=sambanova
--text-model=sambanova/Meta-Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
pytest -s -v tests/integration/inference/test_vision_inference.py
--stack-config=sambanova
--vision-model=sambanova/Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct
# What does this PR do?
The goal of this PR is code base modernization.
Schema reflection code needed a minor adjustment to handle UnionTypes
and collections.abc.AsyncIterator. (Both are preferred for latest Python
releases.)
Note to reviewers: almost all changes here are automatically generated
by pyupgrade. Some additional unused imports were cleaned up. The only
change worth of note can be found under `docs/openapi_generator` and
`llama_stack/strong_typing/schema.py` where reflection code was updated
to deal with "newer" types.
Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
TLDR: Changes needed to get 100% passing tests for OpenAI API
verification tests when run against Llama Stack with the `together`,
`fireworks`, and `openai` providers. And `groq` is better than before,
at 88% passing.
This cleans up the OpenAI API support for image message types
(specifically `image_url` types) and handling of the `response_format`
chat completion parameter. Both of these required a few more Pydantic
model definitions in our Inference API, just to move from the
not-quite-right stubs I had in place to something fleshed out to match
the actual OpenAI API specs.
As part of testing this, I also found and fixed a bug in the litellm
implementation of openai_completion and openai_chat_completion, so the
providers based on those should actually be working now.
The method `prepare_openai_completion_params` in
`llama_stack/providers/utils/inference/openai_compat.py` was improved to
actually recursively clean up input parameters, including handling of
lists, dicts, and dumping of Pydantic models to dicts. These changes
were required to get to 100% passing tests on the OpenAI API
verification against the `openai` provider.
With the above, the together.ai provider was passing as well as it is
without Llama Stack. But, since we have Llama Stack in the middle, I
took the opportunity to clean up the together.ai provider so that it now
also passes the OpenAI API spec tests we have at 100%. That means
together.ai is now passing our verification test better when using an
OpenAI client talking to Llama Stack than it is when hitting together.ai
directly, without Llama Stack in the middle.
And, another round of work for Fireworks to improve translation of
incoming OpenAI chat completion requests to Llama Stack chat completion
requests gets the fireworks provider passing at 100%. The server-side
fireworks.ai tool calling support with OpenAI chat completions and Llama
4 models isn't great yet, but by pointing the OpenAI clients at Llama
Stack's API we can clean things up and get everything working as
expected for Llama 4 models.
## Test Plan
### OpenAI API Verification Tests
I ran the OpenAI API verification tests as below and 100% of the tests
passed.
First, start a Llama Stack server that runs the `openai` provider with
the `gpt-4o` and `gpt-4o-mini` models deployed. There's not a template
setup to do this out of the box, so I added a
`tests/verifications/openai-api-verification-run.yaml` to do this.
First, ensure you have the necessary API key environment variables set:
```
export TOGETHER_API_KEY="..."
export FIREWORKS_API_KEY="..."
export OPENAI_API_KEY="..."
```
Then, run a Llama Stack server that serves up all these providers:
```
llama stack run \
--image-type venv \
tests/verifications/openai-api-verification-run.yaml
```
Finally, generate a new verification report against all these providers,
both with and without the Llama Stack server in the middle.
```
python tests/verifications/generate_report.py \
--run-tests \
--provider \
together \
fireworks \
groq \
openai \
together-llama-stack \
fireworks-llama-stack \
groq-llama-stack \
openai-llama-stack
```
You'll see that most of the configurations with Llama Stack in the
middle now pass at 100%, even though some of them do not pass at 100%
when hitting the backend provider's API directly with an OpenAI client.
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with vLLM:
I also ran the smaller `test_openai_completion.py` test suite (that's
not yet merged with the verification tests) on multiple of the
providers, since I had to adjust the method signature of
openai_chat_completion a bit and thus had to touch lots of these
providers to match. Here's the tests I ran there, all passing:
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" llama stack build --template remote-vllm --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct"
```
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with ollama
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" llama stack build --template ollama --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0"
```
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with together.ai
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-Turbo" llama stack build --template together --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-Turbo" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-Turbo"
```
### OpenAI Completion Integration Tests with fireworks.ai
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct" llama stack build --template fireworks --image-type venv --run
```
in another terminal
```
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct"
---------
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
This stubs in some OpenAI server-side compatibility with three new
endpoints:
/v1/openai/v1/models
/v1/openai/v1/completions
/v1/openai/v1/chat/completions
This gives common inference apps using OpenAI clients the ability to
talk to Llama Stack using an endpoint like
http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1 .
The two "v1" instances in there isn't awesome, but the thinking is that
Llama Stack's API is v1 and then our OpenAI compatibility layer is
compatible with OpenAI V1. And, some OpenAI clients implicitly assume
the URL ends with "v1", so this gives maximum compatibility.
The openai models endpoint is implemented in the routing layer, and just
returns all the models Llama Stack knows about.
The following providers should be working with the new OpenAI
completions and chat/completions API:
* remote::anthropic (untested)
* remote::cerebras-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::fireworks (tested)
* remote::fireworks-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::gemini (untested)
* remote::groq-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::nvidia (tested)
* remote::ollama (tested)
* remote::openai (untested)
* remote::passthrough (untested)
* remote::sambanova-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::together (tested)
* remote::together-openai-compat (untested)
* remote::vllm (tested)
The goal to support this for every inference provider - proxying
directly to the provider's OpenAI endpoint for OpenAI-compatible
providers. For providers that don't have an OpenAI-compatible API, we'll
add a mixin to translate incoming OpenAI requests to Llama Stack
inference requests and translate the Llama Stack inference responses to
OpenAI responses.
This is related to #1817 but is a bit larger in scope than just chat
completions, as I have real use-cases that need the older completions
API as well.
## Test Plan
### vLLM
```
VLLM_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1" INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" llama stack build --template remote-vllm --image-type venv --run
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct"
```
### ollama
```
INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" llama stack build --template ollama --image-type venv --run
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=http://localhost:8321 INFERENCE_MODEL="llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0" python -m pytest -v tests/integration/inference/test_openai_completion.py --text-model "llama3.2:3b-instruct-q8_0"
```
## Documentation
Run a Llama Stack distribution that uses one of the providers mentioned
in the list above. Then, use your favorite OpenAI client to send
completion or chat completion requests with the base_url set to
http://localhost:8321/v1/openai/v1 . Replace "localhost:8321" with the
host and port of your Llama Stack server, if different.
---------
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
Move around bits. This makes the copies from llama-models _much_ easier
to maintain and ensures we don't entangle meta-reference specific
tidbits into llama-models code even by accident.
Also, kills the meta-reference-quantized-gpu distro and rolls
quantization deps into meta-reference-gpu.
## Test Plan
```
LLAMA_MODELS_DEBUG=1 \
with-proxy llama stack run meta-reference-gpu \
--env INFERENCE_MODEL=meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct \
--env INFERENCE_CHECKPOINT_DIR=<DIR> \
--env MODEL_PARALLEL_SIZE=4 \
--env QUANTIZATION_TYPE=fp8_mixed
```
Start a server with and without quantization. Point integration tests to
it using:
```
pytest -s -v tests/integration/inference/test_text_inference.py \
--stack-config http://localhost:8321 --text-model meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct
```
### What does this PR do?
Currently, `ToolCall.arguments` is a `Dict[str, RecursiveType]`.
However, on the client SDK side -- the `RecursiveType` gets deserialized
into a number ( both int and float get collapsed ) and hence when params
are `int` they get converted to float which might break client side
tools that might be doing type checking.
Closes: https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/issues/1683
### Test Plan
Stainless changes --
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack-client-python/pull/204
```
pytest -s -v --stack-config=fireworks tests/integration/agents/test_agents.py --text-model meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
```
# What does this PR do?
The commit addresses the Ruff warning B008 by refactoring the code to
avoid calling SamplingParams() directly in function argument defaults.
Instead, it either uses Field(default_factory=SamplingParams) for
Pydantic models or sets the default to None and instantiates
SamplingParams inside the function body when the argument is None.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
See Issue #922
The change is slightly backwards incompatible but no callsite (in our
client codebases or stack-apps) every passes a depth-2
`List[List[InterleavedContentItem]]` (which is now disallowed.)
## Test Plan
```bash
$ cd llama_stack/providers/tests/inference
$ pytest -s -v -k fireworks test_embeddings.py \
--inference-model nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5 --env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=784
$ pytest -s -v -k together test_embeddings.py \
--inference-model togethercomputer/m2-bert-80M-8k-retrieval --env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=784
$ pytest -s -v -k ollama test_embeddings.py \
--inference-model all-minilm:latest --env EMBEDDING_DIMENSION=784
```
Also ran `tests/client-sdk/inference/test_embeddings.py`
There should be a choke-point for llama3.api imports -- this is the
prompt adapter. Creating a ChatFormat() object on demand is inexpensive.
The underlying Tokenizer is a singleton anyway.
# What does this PR do?
Before this change, `distro_codegen.py` would only work if the user
manually installed multiple provider-specific dependencies (see #1122).
Now, users can run `distro_codegen.py` without any provider-specific
dependencies because we avoid importing the entire provider
implementations just to get the config needed to build the provider
template.
Concretely, this mostly means moving the
MODEL_ALIASES (and related variants) definitions to a new models.py
class within the provider implementation for those providers that
require additional dependencies. It also meant moving a couple of
imports from top-level imports to inside `get_adapter_impl` for some
providers, which follows the pattern used by multiple existing
providers.
To ensure we don't regress and accidentally add new imports that cause
distro_codegen.py to fail, the stubbed-in pre-commit hook for
distro_codegen.py was uncommented and slightly tweaked to run via `uv
run python ...` to ensure it runs with only the project's default
dependencies and to run automatically instead of manually.
Lastly, this updates distro_codegen.py itself to keep track of paths it
might have changed and to only `git diff` those specific paths when
checking for changed files instead of doing a diff on the entire working
tree. The latter was overly broad and would require a user have no other
unstaged changes in their working tree, even if those unstaged changes
were unrelated to generated code. Now it only flags uncommitted changes
for paths distro_codegen.py actually writes to.
Our generated code was also out-of-date, presumably because of these
issues, so this commit also has some updates to the generated code
purely because it was out of sync, and the pre-commit hook now enforces
things to be updated.
(Closes#1122)
## Test Plan
I manually tested distro_codegen.py and the pre-commit hook to verify
those work as expected, flagging any uncommited changes and catching any
imports that attempt to pull in provider-specific dependencies.
However, I do not have valid api keys to the impacted provider
implementations, and am unable to easily run the inference tests against
each changed provider. There are no functional changes to the provider
implementations here, but I'd appreciate a second set of eyes on the
changed import statements and moving of MODEL_ALIASES type code to a
separate models.py to ensure I didn't make any obvious errors.
---------
Signed-off-by: Ben Browning <bbrownin@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
llama-models should have extremely minimal cruft. Its sole purpose
should be didactic -- show the simplest implementation of the llama
models and document the prompt formats, etc.
This PR is the complement to
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/pull/279
## Test Plan
Ensure all `llama` CLI `model` sub-commands work:
```bash
llama model list
llama model download --model-id ...
llama model prompt-format -m ...
```
Ran tests:
```bash
cd tests/client-sdk
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v inference/
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v vector_io/
LLAMA_STACK_CONFIG=fireworks pytest -s -v agents/
```
Create a fresh venv `uv venv && source .venv/bin/activate` and run
`llama stack build --template fireworks --image-type venv` followed by
`llama stack run together --image-type venv` <-- the server runs
Also checked that the OpenAPI generator can run and there is no change
in the generated files as a result.
```bash
cd docs/openapi_generator
sh run_openapi_generator.sh
```
# What does this PR do?
- Configured ruff linter to automatically fix import sorting issues.
- Set --exit-non-zero-on-fix to ensure non-zero exit code when fixes are
applied.
- Enabled the 'I' selection to focus on import-related linting rules.
- Ran the linter, and formatted all codebase imports accordingly.
- Removed the black dep from the "dev" group since we use ruff
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
[//]: # (If resolving an issue, uncomment and update the line below)
[//]: # (Closes #[issue-number])
## Test Plan
[Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes with result
summaries. *Provide clear instructions so the plan can be easily
re-executed.*]
[//]: # (## Documentation)
[//]: # (- [ ] Added a Changelog entry if the change is significant)
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Han <seb@redhat.com>
# What does this PR do?
`tool_config` is missing from the signature but is used in
`ChatCompletionRequest()`.
## Test Plan
This is a small fix. I don't have SambaNova to test the change but I
doubt that this is currently working.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
The current default system prompt for llama3.2 tends to overindex on
tool calling and doesn't work well when the prompt does not require tool
calling.
This PR adds an option to override the default system prompt, and
organizes tool-related configs into a new config object.
- [ ] Addresses issue (#issue)
## Test Plan
python -m unittest
llama_stack.providers.tests.inference.test_prompt_adapter
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [ ] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation.
- [ ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with
[ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/937).
* #938
* __->__ #937
Lint check in main branch is failing. This fixes the lint check after we
moved to ruff in https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/pull/921. We
need to move to a `ruff.toml` file as well as fixing and ignoring some
additional checks.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
# What does this PR do?
- Fix typo
- Support Llama 3.3 70B
## Test Plan
Run the following scripts and obtain the test results
Script
```
pytest -s -v --providers inference=sambanova llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_streaming --env SAMBANOVA_API_KEY={API_KEY}
```
Result
```
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_streaming[-sambanova] PASSED
=========================================== 1 passed, 1 warning in 1.26s ============================================
```
Script
```
pytest -s -v --providers inference=sambanova llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_non_streaming --env SAMBANOVA_API_KEY={API_KEY}
```
Result
```
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_non_streaming[-sambanova] PASSED
=========================================== 1 passed, 1 warning in 0.52s ============================================
```
## Sources
Please link relevant resources if necessary.
## Before submitting
- [N] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [Y] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [Y] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [Y] Updated relevant documentation.
- [N] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
# What does this PR do?
- Fix loading SambaNovaImpl issue
- Add LlamaGuard model support for inference
## Test Plan
Run the following unit test scripts and results
### Embedding
```
pytest -s -v --providers inference=sambanova llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_embeddings.py --inference-model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct --env SAMBANOVA_API_KEY={SAMBANOVA_API_KEY}
```
```
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_embeddings.py::TestEmbeddings::test_embeddings[-sambanova] SKIPPED (This test is only applicable for embedding models)
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_embeddings.py::TestEmbeddings::test_batch_embeddings[-sambanova] SKIPPED (This test is only applicable for embedding models)
=================================================================================================================== 2 skipped, 1 warning in 0.32s ===================================================================================================================
```
### Vision
```
pytest -s -v --providers inference=sambanova llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_vision_inference.py --inference-model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct --env SAMBANOVA_API_KEY={SAMBANOVA_API_KEY}
```
```
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_vision_inference.py::TestVisionModelInference::test_vision_chat_completion_non_streaming[-sambanova-image0-expected_strings0] PASSED
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_vision_inference.py::TestVisionModelInference::test_vision_chat_completion_non_streaming[-sambanova-image1-expected_strings1] PASSED
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_vision_inference.py::TestVisionModelInference::test_vision_chat_completion_streaming[-sambanova] PASSED
=================================================================================================================== 3 passed, 1 warning in 2.68s ====================================================================================================================
```
### Text
```
pytest -s -v --providers inference=sambanova llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_streaming --env SAMBANOVA_API_KEY={SAMBANOVA_API_KEY}
```
```
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_streaming[-sambanova] PASSED
=================================================================================================================== 1 passed, 1 warning in 0.46s ====================================================================================================================
```
```
pytest -s -v --providers inference=sambanova llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_non_streaming --env SAMBANOVA_API_KEY={SAMBANOVA_API_KEY}
```
```
llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py::TestInference::test_chat_completion_non_streaming[-sambanova] PASSED
=================================================================================================================== 1 passed, 1 warning in 0.48s ====================================================================================================================
```
## Before submitting
- [] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [Y] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [Y] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [Y] Updated relevant documentation.
- [Y] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
# What does this PR do?
This PR adds SambaNova as one of the Provider
- Add SambaNova as a provider
## Test Plan
Test the functional command
```
pytest -s -v --providers inference=sambanova llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_embeddings.py llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_prompt_adapter.py llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_text_inference.py llama_stack/providers/tests/inference/test_vision_inference.py --env SAMBANOVA_API_KEY=<sambanova-api-key>
```
Test the distribution template:
```
# Docker
LLAMA_STACK_PORT=5001
docker run -it -p $LLAMA_STACK_PORT:$LLAMA_STACK_PORT \
llamastack/distribution-sambanova \
--port $LLAMA_STACK_PORT \
--env SAMBANOVA_API_KEY=$SAMBANOVA_API_KEY
# Conda
llama stack build --template sambanova --image-type conda
llama stack run ./run.yaml \
--port $LLAMA_STACK_PORT \
--env SAMBANOVA_API_KEY=$SAMBANOVA_API_KEY
```
## Source
[SambaNova API Documentation](https://cloud.sambanova.ai/apis)
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [Y] Ran pre-commit to handle lint / formatting issues.
- [Y] Read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-stack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
Pull Request section?
- [Y] Updated relevant documentation.
- [Y ] Wrote necessary unit or integration tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ashwin Bharambe <ashwin.bharambe@gmail.com>
